• atzanteolEnglish
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    0
    ·
    28 days ago
    link
    fedilink

    It forces you to be careful in the way it wants you to be careful. Which is fine, but it makes it a strange beastie for anyone not used to it.

    • Kairos
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      28 days ago
      link
      fedilink

      Yes

      But the trade off is well worth it.

      • atzanteolEnglish
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        28 days ago
        link
        fedilink

        It can be, sure. I prefer garbage collectors but I’m not doing systems programming.

        • Kairos
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          0
          ·
          28 days ago
          edit-2
          28 days ago
          link
          fedilink

          I feel like a garbage collector would be too much a performance hit for kernel stuff.

          • InverseParallaxEnglish
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            0
            ·
            28 days ago
            link
            fedilink

            2 things:

            1. It’s more the determinacy, a GC randomly fires up and your systems stops for some long amount of time. There are pauseless GCs but that’s a different nightmare.

            2. The kernel has things similar to GCs. They’re used for more specialized tasks, and some (like rcu) are absolute nightmares that have take decades to get working.