The United Nations human rights chief says weaponizing ordinary communication devices represents a new development in warfare.
  • PennomiEnglish
    461·
    25 days ago

    It’s enforceable. A war between two countries does not exist in a vacuum. The whole rest of the world can impose sanctions against the violator.

    Whether they will in this case is another matter entirely.

    • MrNesser
      105·
      25 days ago

      Problem with sanctions is they haven’t proved Israel did this. Its plausible deniability

      • homura1650
        221·
        25 days ago

        Part of plausible deniability is that it has to be plausible. There has been no plausible argument presented that Israel did not do the pager and walkie talkie attack. For that matter, there hasn’t even been a denial about it.

        • RubberDuck
          41·
          25 days ago

          Then again a denial would also not be plausible. Either way, saying nothing is their best course of action.

    • Brkdncr
      39·
      25 days ago

      Is that law though? No one is going to jail. Sounds more a contract or agreement.

      • PennomiEnglish
        190·
        25 days ago

        Law between nation states is different than for citizens.

        • RubberDuck
          41·
          25 days ago

          The difference is enforcement capabilities. Geopolitical enforcement is not impossible it just gets murky quick. So many different priorities.