I have quite an extensive collection of media that my server makes available through different means (Jellyfin, NFS, mostly). One of my harddrives has some concerning smart values so I want to replace it. What are good harddrives to buy today? Are there any important tech specs to look out for? In the past I didn’t give this too much attention and it didn’t bite me, yet. But if I’m gonna buy a new drive now, I might as well

I’m looking for something from 4TB upwards. I think I remember that drives with very high capacity are more likely to fail sooner - is that correct? How about different brands - do any have particularly good or bad reputation?

Thanks for any hints!

    • femtechEnglish
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      0
      ·
      23 days ago
      link
      fedilink

      I just keep adding 2 more drives as it gets full. Not sure if that’s the best thing.

    • TheHolmEnglish
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      22 days ago
      link
      fedilink

      I would not trust these kind of dives in the mirror. IMHO RAID6 is the only way.

      • Avid AmoebaEnglish
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        0
        ·
        22 days ago
        link
        fedilink

        Due to risk of failure or risk of data corruption because the mirror can’t tell which drive is right when there’s a difference?

        • TheHolmEnglish
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          0
          ·
          20 days ago
          link
          fedilink

          ZFS or BTRF mirror will know which side is at fault due to checksums. I’m more concern about simultaneous falures of two disks. Rebuilding of a RAID puts lots of pressure on remaining disks, so probability that remaining one dies too is much higher. with RAID6 3 disks need to die to lost date, which is less likely but not impossible.

        • turmacarEnglish
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          0
          ·
          22 days ago
          edit-2
          22 days ago
          link
          fedilink

          The second one.

          Mirroring is good for speed, but a storage mechanism with parity checks will always be more recoverable. And you will have far more storage available.

          • Avid AmoebaEnglish
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            0
            ·
            22 days ago
            edit-2
            22 days ago
            link
            fedilink

            I think data checksums allow ZFS to tell which disk has the correct data when there’s a mismatch in a mirror, eliminating the need for 3-way mirror to deal with bit flips and such. A traditional mirror like mdraid would need 3 disks to do this.

      • peregusEnglish
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        0
        ·
        22 days ago
        link
        fedilink

        IMHO RAID6 is the only way.

        Or SnapRaid