• Philo
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    0
    ·
    22 days ago
    link
    fedilink

    Missouri speaks for the entire US now?

    • Famous_Anus_Cookies
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      0
      ·
      22 days ago
      link
      fedilink

      Sure, we’ll pretend that this hasn’t been happening here for hundreds of years across all 50 states.

      • Philo
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        0
        ·
        22 days ago
        link
        fedilink

        Actually SCOTUS speaks for Trump since he was the POS that installed them.

        • تحريرها كلها ممكن
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          0
          ·
          21 days ago
          link
          fedilink

          The people are responsible for who they elect and the actions they take. So millions of people in the US are to blame for this even if they aren’t a majority thanks to how elections work in the US since Clinton won the popular vote.

          • Philo
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            0
            ·
            21 days ago
            link
            fedilink

            Clinton was well over 30 years ago. Please join us in the present.

              • Philo
                arrow-up
                0
                arrow-down
                0
                ·
                20 days ago
                link
                fedilink

                Still, almost 10 years ago.

                • تحريرها كلها ممكن
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  arrow-down
                  0
                  ·
                  20 days ago
                  edit-2
                  20 days ago
                  link
                  fedilink

                  SCOTUS appointments are for life. The 70 million or so who voted for him will be responsible even after their death of many of them.

                  • Philo
                    arrow-up
                    0
                    arrow-down
                    0
                    ·
                    20 days ago
                    link
                    fedilink

                    How does 70 million translate into one state speaking for the entire country of 330 million?

                  • The CuuuuubeEnglish
                    arrow-up
                    0
                    arrow-down
                    0
                    ·
                    20 days ago
                    link
                    fedilink

                    you’re getting gish galloped i think. this other person is just gonna keep pulling you further and further from the actual problem, which is that this problem is not unique to just one state and requires systemic change throughout the nation to fix

    • The CuuuuubeEnglish
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      0
      ·
      22 days ago
      link
      fedilink

      Missouri isn’t so different from everywhere else

        • The CuuuuubeEnglish
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          0
          ·
          22 days ago
          link
          fedilink

          I’ve spent a lifetime traveling the united states. i originate from Appalachia. bad and racist judgements come all across the country. any state with the death penalty on the books will eventually do this, and any state that doesn’t have the death penalty on the books has around 30% of people minimum who think it should be. you’re deluding yourself if you don’t think everywhere is like everywhere else just with different ratios of who is around

          • Philo
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            0
            ·
            22 days ago
            link
            fedilink

            This would also mean California is like Alabama which is like New York which going even farther because borders are man-made, exactly like London which is exactly like Israel, Gaza, Yemensee how your argument is stupid or do I need to go on?

            • The CuuuuubeEnglish
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              0
              ·
              22 days ago
              link
              fedilink

              no actually. i don’t see how my view that people are all people and the things we do is all in response to the context we grow up in is stupid. so please keep listing places that we have both the potential to improve or to degrade into depending on what actions we take and if we can learn to empathize

    • TheTechnician27English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      0
      ·
      22 days ago
      edit-2
      22 days ago
      link
      fedilink

      The fact that the US federal government has the power to outlaw this but doesn’t, that this specific execution was brought before the Supreme Court and they voted against blocking it 63, and the fact that the majority of US states (27) and the federal government have this on the books speak for the US now, yes.

      Taken to an absurd extreme, let’s imagine that the US federal government and 27 of its states explicitly had statutes on the books stating “you can legally rape puppies”, and you stepping in and saying “Well that doesn’t speak for the entire US! Stop trying to make it sound like everyone condones puppy rape just because Missouri allows it!” Would you say that then? Because I feel like any rational person would be asking “Why does the US allow this to happen? If not, why would you say it here?" The US is simply backwards in this regard.

      • Philo
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        0
        ·
        22 days ago
        link
        fedilink

        Puppy rape? Is that supposed to be an argument?

        • TheTechnician27English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          0
          ·
          22 days ago
          link
          fedilink

          Would you come to the US’ defense in the same way that you are right now over state-sanctioned murder in the situation I outlined? It’s a very simple yes/no question that you’re tiptoeing around for seemingly no reason.

          • Philo
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            0
            ·
            22 days ago
            link
            fedilink

            In saying that one state doesn’t speak for the entire country, YES. That was said in my first comment, maybe you should reread it.

            • TheTechnician27English
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              0
              ·
              22 days ago
              link
              fedilink

              Damn, last I checked, 27 plus the federal government was more than 1. Maybe the federal government expressed as an integer actually comes out to negative 26 and makes your ridiculous defense make any sense.

              • Philo
                arrow-up
                0
                arrow-down
                0
                ·
                22 days ago
                link
                fedilink

                I didn’t mention numbers but you mentioned puppy rape. Stop drinking so early, it’ll rot your liver.

                • TheTechnician27English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  arrow-down
                  0
                  ·
                  22 days ago
                  link
                  fedilink

                  I didn’t mention numbers

                  One state

                  I think you got lost on the way to /c/preschool where they teach you what numbers are.

                  • Philo
                    arrow-up
                    0
                    arrow-down
                    0
                    ·
                    22 days ago
                    link
                    fedilink

                    My first comment said “Missouri speaks for the entire US now? where exactly did I say one state? What hallucinogenic are you on right now?

    • queermunist she/her
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      0
      ·
      22 days ago
      link
      fedilink

      The US can be judged by the actions of any single state. It’s all the same country 🙄

      • Philo
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        0
        ·
        22 days ago
        link
        fedilink

        Like a book can be judged by its cover cause its all the same book?

          • Philo
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            0
            ·
            22 days ago
            link
            fedilink

            You haven’t read much because that is an extremely stupid analogy.

        • AntiOutsideAktionEnglish
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          0
          ·
          22 days ago
          link
          fedilink

          Do you need someone to explain how stupid this is, or have you calmed down since you reacted?