• Tja
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    0
    ·
    20 days ago
    link
    fedilink

    How would that help? If you release something as GPL code, you cannot prevent it from being used to train a model, no matter where it’s hosted.

    • null
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      0
      ·
      20 days ago
      link
      fedilink

      There’s a difference between handing something to someone and leaving it somewhere they happen to be able to take it from.

    • kittenzrulz123
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      0
      ·
      20 days ago
      link
      fedilink

      Im personally waiting for a massive lawsuit, legally companies cannot train AI on GPL code (at least I don’t believe so)

      • Tja
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        0
        ·
        20 days ago
        link
        fedilink

        There’s nothing in GPL that would forbid it. Only distribution without code publication is forbidden.

        • macniel
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          0
          ·
          20 days ago
          link
          fedilink

          mhm, and how would the distribution inside an LLM work? Are those code snippets CoPilot et al produce come with dedicated license sections?

          And regarding how it would help selfhosting the code: it wouldn’t be on the GITHub servers owned by Microsoft, which owns/operates CoPilot. Its akin to feeding the LLM directly by pushing it to their servers.

        • kittenzrulz123
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          0
          ·
          20 days ago
          link
          fedilink

          If Al warned about that it would be legal, I don’t believe any AI requires GPL