Has anyone here had success with USB fingerprint scanners? I also found this Microsoft keyboard with fingerprint reader but I don’t know if it works with linux.

  • Revv
    arrow-up
    45
    arrow-down
    0
    ·
    16 days ago
    edit-2
    16 days ago
    link
    fedilink

    Here’s the list of devices supported by fprint

    For non -standalone readers, you’ll have to look up the actual fingerprint reader embedded within it.

    Edit: it looks like this is a Bluetooth keyboard. My guess is it’s highly unlikely to work with Linux as a fingerprint reader.

    • rotopenguinEnglish
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      0
      ·
      14 days ago
      link
      fedilink

      It’s a shame that that the list doesn’t translate well into “what device can I go out and buy”? Every shitty manufacturer has to constantly churn design changes, and hide it all behind the exact same model number.

  • refalo
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    15 days ago
    edit-2
    15 days ago
    link
    fedilink

    I use the DigitalPersona 4500 with libfprint. Unfortunately, there are multiple revisions of the device with the same model number and only some of them work properly under Linux (different encryption method I believe). As far as I know this is not actually documented anywhere. Googling just shows a bunch of unresolved bug reports of people having no idea why it doesn’t work.

    • mFatOPEnglish
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      0
      ·
      15 days ago
      link
      fedilink

      Would you mind sharing your lsusb output?

      • refalo
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        0
        ·
        15 days ago
        link
        fedilink

        Bus 001 Device 059: ID 05ba:000a DigitalPersona, Inc. Fingerprint Reader

        It shows up exactly the same for all the revisions though.

  • BOFH666
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    16 days ago
    link
    fedilink

    Almost every one of the fingerprint sensors in laptops are not supported by Linux due to proprietary protocols. Never managed to get stuff used by Dell or HP with Linux.

    But the Grow R503 can be used over uart, what can be connected to usb with some minor additional parts.

    • refalo
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      0
      ·
      15 days ago
      link
      fedilink

      Thankfully the Framework Laptop fingerprint reader works.

      • Cysioland
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        0
        ·
        15 days ago
        link
        fedilink

        That’s why I’m buying it because they’ve got actual Linux support (and because of being able to reconfigure it for the task at hand)

    • sic_semper_tyrannisEnglish
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      0
      ·
      15 days ago
      link
      fedilink

      I recently got a Dell Latitude 14 2-in-1 with the AMD 8840U, Put on the latest Fedora Kinoite and the fingerprint reader works FYI.

      • RV5
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        0
        ·
        14 days ago
        link
        fedilink

        same with my old Lenovo P53 (for years) -I needed adding some packages though, but that was so long ago

      • OccasionallyFeralyaEnglish
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        0
        ·
        15 days ago
        link
        fedilink

        same here but I have a Dell Inspiron 7415 2-in-1. Just installed fedora and it worked out of the box.

    • K4mpfie
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      0
      ·
      15 days ago
      link
      fedilink

      That sucks so much. I have such a cool vein scanner built in to unlock my laptop jedi style and I can’t use it because Fujitsu decided to not add support for Linux 🙄

    • beeng
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      0
      ·
      15 days ago
      link
      fedilink

      T480s here works on Ubuntu.

    • syaochanEnglish
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      0
      ·
      15 days ago
      link
      fedilink

      HP Zbook 15" G7 working out of the box but not great detection reliability (might be an unfortunate specimen). Lenovo Thinkpad T580 much better although not working out of the box on LMDE

    • Eheran
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      0
      ·
      15 days ago
      link
      fedilink

      For simple PC unlocking etc. they are perfectly fine and improve security due to their far higher usability.

      The same way 10 key files on 10 different locations combined with this and that are more secure than a simple 60 character password. But the simple password is far more practical, so far more secure overall since people actually use it.

      • NauticalNoodle
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        15 days ago
        link
        fedilink

        It’s easier to steal, copy, or alternatively subpoena a fingerprint.

        • SavvyWolfEnglish
          arrow-up
          20
          arrow-down
          0
          ·
          15 days ago
          edit-2
          15 days ago
          link
          fedilink

          https://imgs.xkcd.com/comics/security.png

          For most people, the only security they really need is against people either stealing devices or accessing them without permission. In those cases, biometrics (if implemented properly) and passwords are roughly equivalent.

            • Eheran
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              0
              ·
              15 days ago
              link
              fedilink

              “we” as in absolutely not most people.

              • delirious_owl
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                0
                ·
                15 days ago
                link
                fedilink

                Just people who include “getting beaten with a wrench by my adversaries” in their threat model

    • seaQueue
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      0
      ·
      15 days ago
      edit-2
      15 days ago
      link
      fedilink

      More secure legally. You generally can’t be compelled to disclose a password that incriminates you (unless it’s already apparent that you’re guilty of wrong-doing) but a thing (physical key, fingerprint, etc) isn’t protected in the same way and can be demanded by the court.

      Whether biometric are secure or not is another question, they can be stolen like any other data or a motivated attacker could just take you or your fingers.

      • Possibly linuxEnglish
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        0
        ·
        15 days ago
        link
        fedilink

        You can use a piece of tape to get a fingerprint off the case of the device. No it is not as secure as a strong password

    • cmnyboEnglish
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      0
      ·
      15 days ago
      link
      fedilink

      Biometrics plus a password is even more secure.

    • Possibly linuxEnglish
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      15 days ago
      link
      fedilink

      I’m not sure why the down votes. You are completely right

      • bkuri
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        0
        ·
        15 days ago
        link
        fedilink

        They didn’t ask for security advice, though