• TheMightyCanuck
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    12 days ago
    link
    fedilink

    Damn, that’s a pretty low step goal for a full day 2700?

    I thought the normal average for good health was 10k

      • TheMightyCanuck
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        0
        ·
        12 days ago
        link
        fedilink

        Basically the benifits of walking (on lowering all-cause mortality) sort of plateau at 8700

        10k still isn’t a bad metric to strive for.

      • Bongles
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        0
        ·
        12 days ago
        link
        fedilink

        And it also was never all or nothing. I keep my goal at 6000 just because 10k (i didn’t know about 8700) isn’t realistic for me. It’s still better than what I would walk normally.

      • CosmicTurtle0English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        0
        ·
        12 days ago
        link
        fedilink

        Don’t be intimidated though. If you’re not regularly exercising, start with a smaller goal And increase at a rate you’re comfortable with. Walking is a great activity and is great for your body and easier on your knees than running.

        The point is to do more than you are now.

        • Duranie
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          0
          ·
          12 days ago
          link
          fedilink

          What I appreciate about my Garmin is that it adjusts my step goals up and down to make them achievable. Miss my goal for the day? The next day is a few steps less. Hit my goal? The next is a few steps more. I get the satisfaction of reaching goals, but don’t feel bad about myself if I miss.

      • WolfLink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        0
        ·
        12 days ago
        link
        fedilink

        It sounds like whoever said 10k rounded up. Doesn’t seem unreasonable imo.

    • SuperSaiyanSwagEnglish
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      0
      ·
      12 days ago
      link
      fedilink

      Might be like Garmin where it automatically adjusts goal based on the historical data

    • saltescOP
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      0
      ·
      12 days ago
      link
      fedilink

      It’s just for office days because I do a lot of computer time. I dont pay attention otherwise and have a different watch I wear for my normal outdoor activities. It’s three times thicker and has no space left for health-related sensors or a pedometer. But if this one approximates just 1km is 1,000 steps, I’m doubling down on not needing to care about steps outside of office days.

      • WolfLink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        0
        ·
        12 days ago
        link
        fedilink

        Wait 1km is 1000 steps sounds like some pretty big steps

        • Krzd
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          0
          ·
          12 days ago
          edit-2
          12 days ago
          link
          fedilink

          Yeah, normal step lengths are around 60 - 80 cm depending on height and pace

          EDIT: obviously injured/elderly people are much lower, and running is much higher, which might explain the distance if OP’s watch thought he was running