• NegativeLookBehind
    arrow-up
    307
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    9 months ago
    link
    fedilink

    Meanwhile, Trump’s a free man, goose stepping around in his fucking lift shoes, with 91 Federal charges against him. This country is so backwards.

    • TherouxSonfeir
      arrow-up
      134
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      9 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      Kind of makes you want to stop obeying laws, doesn’t it?

      • stoly
        arrow-up
        62
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago
        link
        fedilink

        I once mentioned to my father that most people are likely felons without realizing it because everyone will have violated a whole slew of laws they are unaware of or that are obscure/unenforced. He, being a conservative, became angry with me.

        • TherouxSonfeir
          arrow-up
          22
          arrow-down
          0
          ·
          9 months ago
          link
          fedilink

          I can probably come up with a dozen felonies and goodness knows how many misdemeanors I’ve committed in my life, and I’m definitely not a menace to society.

          None of these are violent or sexual in nature.

          • stoly
            arrow-up
            14
            arrow-down
            0
            ·
            9 months ago
            edit-2
            9 months ago
            link
            fedilink

            Exactly. The worst thing that most people do as far as common laws are concerned is speeding.

            The real bad things that happen that are rarely enforced is spousal and child abuse, religious abuse, abuse from certain authorities, etc. These destroy lives.

        • shani66
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 months ago
          link
          fedilink

          God it feels good knowing we can actually say the solution to the world’s ills out loud here. You’d get banned from Reddit and YouTube for saying the people ruining our planet need to stub their toes.

          • ZamoticEnglish
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            0
            ·
            9 months ago
            link
            fedilink

            You say that, and poof, 2 hours later that post is mysteriously “removed”.

            • shani66
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              0
              ·
              9 months ago
              edit-2
              9 months ago
              link
              fedilink

              Weird i can still see it. Does lemmy save comments on a per instance basis or something?

              just checked it on a different device, fucking hell. people need to leave .world, its just another reddit and has been since i started browsing lemmy.

              • JonsJavaMEnglish
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                0
                ·
                9 months ago
                link
                fedilink

                Could you tell me the post you’re referencing? I would like to investigate this further for you.

          • pinkdrunkenelephantsEnglish
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            0
            ·
            9 months ago
            edit-2
            9 months ago
            link
            fedilink

            !benjamingetthemusket@lemmy.cafe

            Feel free to say #eattherich rhetoric all you want there. I don’t put up with .world’s blatantly obvious corporate shill shit.

            EDIT: From the modlog, here’s the deleted comment.

            If by breaking laws you mean setting the financial district on fire with executives still in those soulless highrise pieces of shit than yes, it kinda does. Imagine the world without what we are told to call “elite”.

      • NegativeLookBehind
        arrow-up
        19
        arrow-down
        0
        ·
        9 months ago
        link
        fedilink

        I’m a commoner and I haven’t lobbied any lawmakers, so the law still applies to me

        • lolcatnipEnglish
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          0
          ·
          9 months ago
          link
          fedilink

          I haven’t set anything on fire yet.

      • werefreeatlast
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago
        link
        fedilink

        You wouldn’t download a car, a House, two beautiful women or their chiyou know a highrise I mean. You wouldn’t download a highrise or a jet plane or two really hot babes. right?

          • werefreeatlast
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            0
            ·
            9 months ago
            link
            fedilink

            I don’t know, have you guys developed the quantum teleportation reflux trackrowave transmission elometer yet? Cuz you’re gonna need at least three of those in a bisiouscope to download anything of value really. And if you’re looking at porn, dude, zoom out until the entire body is in view. It’s a warning you must heed. Otherwise you better figure out how to get rid of body parts if you know what I mean.

        • riodoro1
          arrow-up
          13
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 months ago
          edit-2
          9 months ago
          link
          fedilink

          Go to bed, you have a 12h shift at 6am tommorow.

        • TherouxSonfeir
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          9 months ago
          link
          fedilink

          I think the voting system has established that you’re the troll.

          • NocturnalMorning
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            9 months ago
            link
            fedilink

            I still think it’s you. A lot of foreign actors want the U.S. system to collapse. Maybe you’re not, but your earlier comment sure sounded like it. People are downvoting me bcz they misunderstood what my comment was directed at. I actually agree with the sentiment, but ignoring all of our laws outright is a good way to have no government at all.

            • TherouxSonfeir
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              9 months ago
              link
              fedilink

              Doesn’t it make you feel like the law is less important when all these rich cunts are breaking laws left and right, that would send you to jail real fast, and no one seems to do anything about it?

    • Verdant Banana
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      30
      ·
      9 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      and biden is out running for president too after promising to legalize and police reform and firing staffers for using cannabis

      people seem to still support him too

      US elections are fucking insane

      like watching clones dressed in different skins begging for votes with whatever empty promises they think and know the populace will eat up

      • NegativeLookBehind
        arrow-up
        31
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago
        link
        fedilink

        Empty political promises are one thing and par for the course. Literally getting away with high treason on several documented accounts and still being able to run for president is another.

  • I_Fart_Glitter
    arrow-up
    126
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 months ago
    link
    fedilink

    It’s a flower that makes people happy and hungry. God fucking damn it. There is no fucking reason to destroy people’s lives over this.

    • Crikeste
      arrow-up
      65
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      9 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      Two reason: Conservatism and Christianity.

        • octopus_inkEnglish
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          0
          ·
          9 months ago
          edit-2
          9 months ago
          link
          fedilink

          I don’t even think that article adequately conveys how thoroughly racist the roots of it is. They don’t even quote the awful things Anslinger said to justify cannabis prohibition.

          “There are 100,000 total marijuana smokers in the US, and most are Negroes, Hispanics, Filipinos, and entertainers. Their Satanic music, jazz, and swing, result from marijuana use. This marijuana causes white women to seek sexual relations with Negroes, entertainers, and any others.

          the primary reason to outlaw marijuana is its effect on the degenerate races.

          “Marijuana is an addictive drug which produces in its users insanity, criminality, and death.

          “Reefer makes darkies think they’re as good as white men.

          “Marihuana leads to pacifism and communist brainwashing”

          “You smoke a joint and you’re likely to kill your brother.

          “Marijuana is the most violence-causing drug in the history of mankind.

          https://fee.org/articles/the-racist-roots-of-marijuana-prohibition/

           

          And then there’s this from Nixon staffer John Ehrlichman:

          “The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar left and black people, former Nixon domestic policy chief John Ehrlichman told Harper’s writer Dan Baum for the April cover story published Tuesday.

          “You understand what I’m saying? We knew we couldn’t make it illegal to be either against the war or black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin. And then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities, Ehrlichman said. “We could arrest their leaders. raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did.

          https://www.cnn.com/2016/03/23/politics/john-ehrlichman-richard-nixon-drug-war-blacks-hippie/index.html

      • proleEnglish
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago
        edit-2
        9 months ago
        link
        fedilink

        Nobody has ever been able to explain to me how cannabis use is incompatible with Christianity in any way.

        But then again, I don’t expect Christians to be consistent or logical about anything.

        • theneverfoxEnglish
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          0
          ·
          9 months ago
          link
          fedilink

          Remember that part of the Bible where Jesus was like “forget all the old laws, and just focus on the point, being cool to one another” and then gave a speech about the importance of monogamy? Or when he held the last supper, demonstrating a way to worship without needing a fancy temple, and then said “this is my blood, I’m using a simple cup, but you should always use a gold chalice for this part”. Or how he explained you need a relic of a saint (usually a bit of bone) in every altar or the magic won’t work?

          Do you remember the part where Jesus claimed he was the one and only child of a deity? Because when I read it, he called himself “the son of man” and called everyone his brothers and sisters

          Jesus was born in July. The Roman sun god had a son, who was sacrificed for the sake of humanity. Want to guess when his birthday was?

          There’s a reason why it makes no sense. It’s not the religion you think it is

    • frezik
      arrow-up
      26
      arrow-down
      0
      ·
      9 months ago
      edit-2
      9 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      Reminds me of the Ballarat Bandit: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u-gBErW4aoY

      To put it short, he was a guy who led federal officers on a chase through the desert. They didn’t know who he was, but he was stealing from travelers passing through. It wasn’t far from some US government facilities, and this being not long after 9/11, they’re super worried he’s a terrorist.

      Spoiler: he was a Canadian who started growing weed to help his wife’s medical issues. He apparently made some primo bud and started selling it. Naturally, he got caught and was thrown in jail. When he got out, he moved out to the desert and tried to survive on his own.

      Jail changed him. He became more paranoid and detached from his family, friends, and society. He wasn’t the least bit dangerous until they threw him in prison.

      • EssentialCoffeeEnglish
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        9 months ago
        link
        fedilink

        I’m all for legalized marijuana, but going into another country and breaking their laws is never a good idea. There are places in the world that would be a death sentence.

        • frezik
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          0
          ·
          9 months ago
          edit-2
          9 months ago
          link
          fedilink

          The guy was clearly mentally unstable after he left prison. He never would have done that in the first place otherwise. And he effectively did get a death sentence for it.

          • ShaggySnacksEnglish
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            0
            ·
            9 months ago
            edit-2
            9 months ago
            link
            fedilink

            According to the article titled ‘Ballarat Bandit’ lost to family for years, August 4, 2006 for Pahrump Valley Times, Johnston was living in Canada when they were arrested and charged with trafficking marijuana.

            Eventually, the couple left Anarchist Mountain and returned to Prince Edward Island, where Rob Johnston had been born and raised. After the birth of her fourth child, Tommi was diagnosed with leukemia and access to medical care became vital. Johnston began cultivating marijuana, discovered he had a knack for it and turned it into a cash crop.

            In 1997, when the crop was discovered by Royal Canadian Mounted Police, Johnston was sentenced to two consecutive four-year prison terms. It was then that the couple was legally married, in what Tommi described as an ultimately futile effort on her part to convince him that she would not abandon him.

            Edit: HTML linking

    • Illuminostro
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      There’s one very good reason, according to authoritarians: slave labor. 'Murica.

  • vortic
    arrow-up
    122
    arrow-down
    0
    ·
    9 months ago
    link
    fedilink

    I don’t understand how 40 years of prison for a non-violent crime isn’t considered to be both “cruel” and “unusual”. It is objectively cruel. I certainly hope that it is also unusual. I certainly hope that there aren’t many more like him, imprisoned for decades for what amounts to personal-use levels of pot. 5.5 lbs of pot when you include the stem and roots isn’t that much and certainly sounds like a personal supply to me.

    • marxistsynths19
      arrow-up
      66
      arrow-down
      0
      ·
      9 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      These people are kept in jail to be used in labor. It’s not about being cruel. It’s about making money in the cheapest way possible. Since Alabama is a hellhole with no workforce they turn to modern day slavery.

      • Maggoty
        arrow-up
        24
        arrow-down
        0
        ·
        9 months ago
        edit-2
        9 months ago
        link
        fedilink

        Oh it’s both. It’s definitely both, the cruelty and the slave labor, which is cruel in and of itself as well.

      • buddascrayon
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        0
        ·
        9 months ago
        link
        fedilink

        Yeah, when you read the article you see that the parole board has stopped issuing paroles almost entirely in the last couple of years. This is 100% about manufacturing cheap labor and keeping the oligarchy running smoothly.

    • JustMy2c
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      It is the most cruel people in the world that hide behind a law book and the pretense of being fair and worse even: past cases.

      But since you first have to study for a decade, then kiss ass for a decade or two before even beginning to qualify for ‘JUDGE’ it is not more as normal you will have lost ALL BONDS WITH REGULAR SOCIETY.

      If you think 15$+tax+tip is fine for a glass of wine with lunch on a daily basis; you are NOTTTTTTT qualified to speak for the benefit of society : in contrary!

      • BananaTrifleViolinEnglish
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        9 months ago
        edit-2
        9 months ago
        link
        fedilink

        Yeah I think you’re mistaking what a Judges role is. It is merely to uphold the law. The problem in the US is that the role is so politicised that the idea they are legal experts rather than representatives of parties is being lost. They should be representative of society to an extent but ultimately the main qualification is legal experience.

        The issue is the law itself and that comes back to the elected politicians in Alabama. It’s a problem of one party rule, and first past the post electoral system plus gerrymandering which means a stagnant political system dominated by one segment of society. The US increasingly looks like a it’s just a large collection of failed democracies.

        You don’t specifically need representative judges. You need electoral reform so you have an actual representative democracy, and everything else comes from that.

        • Pat_Riot
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          0
          ·
          9 months ago
          link
          fedilink

          Judges are “supposed to be” impartial, not representative. That’s one of our many problems. They shouldn’t be conservative or liberal, they should be judges, but people don’t seem to be capable of impartiality, especially ones with any degree of power. Just like men who claim to want to lead really wish to rule. Those who would judge really just want to decide.

        • JustMy2c
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          0
          ·
          9 months ago
          link
          fedilink

          The MAKING of the law favors the establishment. I say use the guillotine first, then new laws. Slave master still a slave master now, only the slaves believe they’re free

        • JustMy2c
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          0
          ·
          9 months ago
          link
          fedilink

          I’m stating it’s the WRONG ROLE law should NOT be upheld in the same way for poor and rich. For uneducated and the wise.

          IT SHOULD NOT BE THE SAME favoring the poor and weak.

          HOWEVER IT FAVORS THE EXACT OPOSITE.

          • pinkdrunkenelephantsEnglish
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            0
            ·
            9 months ago
            link
            fedilink

            It shouldn’t favor anybody.

            If anything, it goes to show why legal systems are plain and simply bad ideas and why people need to have the ultimate authority to handle business on their own again. That way, at least, it’s fair, for every man is provided for by either victory, ingenuity, or death.

            • vortic
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              9 months ago
              link
              fedilink

              Okay, I’m genuinely curious, can you elaborate on what you’re advocating? What time in human history do you think we should return to? Tribalism?

              I don’t think there has ever been a period of time where there wasn’t some form of social organization. Humans are naturally social and tend to create social groups with rules and enforcement mechanisms. Even if we were to start with a blank slate where there were no governments, companies, tribes, or social groups, humans would quickly recreate them because we have evolved to make use of social structures. We are stronger as a group than individually and groups only survive by having rules and methods of enforcement.

              • pinkdrunkenelephantsEnglish
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                0
                ·
                9 months ago
                link
                fedilink

                You’re not genuinely curious or here in good faith, you’re derisive, vindictive and guilty of every moral failing you’re about to accuse me of having for not thinking the way you do.

                So you do not get the luxury of a debate with me.

                Now I said that legal systems are plain and simply bad ideas, and that sadly is not going to change no matter who does what. It’s just the reality of the situation.

                So move on from this conversation like you would have told me to had I wasted your time arguing with you about it.

                • vortic
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  0
                  ·
                  9 months ago
                  link
                  fedilink

                  If I came across as derisive, I didn’t mean to. I was genuinely trying to ask what you meant.

                  I don’t know how it is possible for me to be vindictive when I don’t know you. I don’t want revenge against you. You’ve done nothing to me.

                  I wasn’t going to accuse you of any kind of moral failing and am not sure why you took my response as a personal attack on your moral character.

                  You stated that “legal systems are plain and simply bad ideas” and that “people need to have the ultimate authority to handle business on their own again”. That sounds like you are advocating a return to something that existed in the past where people could act autonomously, without regard for the legal system.

                  I am responding that I don’t think that people have ever had the “ultimate authority to handle business on their own” and am wondering if you can give an explanation of what you are suggesting. I’m arguing that, when presented with anarchy, humans will always tend to create social structures and legal systems.

      • some_guy
        arrow-up
        20
        arrow-down
        0
        ·
        9 months ago
        link
        fedilink

        Wtf. If they were growing five hundred plants, 40 years is too much. It’s fucking pot. People get rich selling that shit legally now. Growers should be released.

      • Rooter
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago
        edit-2
        9 months ago
        link
        fedilink

        Bullshit, reported for spreading false information.

        there is no record of any previous arrests or charges for Leon Bud Hotchkiss in Alabama¹²³. He was a first-time offender when he was convicted of marijuana trafficking in 2013². He has maintained a clean institutional record since then².

        Fucking trump supporters are the worst, you can’t get anything right.

      • stevedidWHAT
        arrow-up
        24
        arrow-down
        0
        ·
        9 months ago
        edit-2
        9 months ago
        link
        fedilink

        Alabama has plenty of problems outside of being able to smoke weed or not

        For example choosing to imprison older people to what is effectively a life sentence for a non violent charge

        • CaptainSpaceman
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          0
          ·
          9 months ago
          link
          fedilink

          Sorry, that was my point I tried to make. If they legalize to recreational, expunging convictions is a much bigger likelihood and maybe he will see freedom soon.

          • Perfide
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            9 months ago
            link
            fedilink

            That’s a massive leap. Even if they legalized recreational, and that’s a BIG if, that doesn’t mean they will expunge existing convictions.

            • CaptainSpaceman
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              0
              ·
              9 months ago
              link
              fedilink

              Indeed, which is why I chose my words carefully on the previous response.

          • stevedidWHAT
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            0
            ·
            9 months ago
            link
            fedilink

            All good! Miscomms happen nbd to talk it out for me ☺️

      • 【J】【u】【s】【t】【Z】
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago
        link
        fedilink

        Code of Alabama Sec. 13A-6-64 - Sodomy in the Second Degree.

        Includes consenting adults having oral and anal sex. But Alabama says they do not and will not prosecute people for it. Still on the books, though.

        • meat_popsicle
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          0
          ·
          9 months ago
          link
          fedilink

          Lawyers fucking suck. They always have to play fucking games with unspoken language. Their full sentence is:

          “do not and will not prosecute people for ituntil the Comstock Act comes back into effect or the 14th Amendment no longer provides privacy protections.

          Lawyers would weasel us out of any and all rights just because it gives them more billable hours and more casework.

          • BigWheelPowerBrakeSlider
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            0
            ·
            9 months ago
            link
            fedilink

            Overzealous legislators who make the laws and mandatory minimums suck first and foremost, then prosecutors and sentencing judges who do not use judicial discretion fairly and empathetically. Lots of lawyers are good people and it’s worth noting that civil rights are protected almost exclusively by lawyers.

            • meat_popsicle
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              0
              ·
              9 months ago
              link
              fedilink

              Lawyers have no obligation to act with empathy. There is no obligation to act fairly - because they can always twist the definition of what “is” is. I can find a thousand examples of unfair judicial actions that legally wouldn’t be considered unfair.

              Hell, Anthony Scalia said “mere factual innocence is no reason not to carry out a death sentence properly reached. How can that not be the definition of unfair - our SCoTUS ruled that it’s totally legal and fair to execute a factually innocent person.

              Civil rights need protection primarily because of the lawyers trying to infringe on them.

        • lolcatnipEnglish
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          0
          ·
          9 months ago
          link
          fedilink

          They pinky swear they won’t enforce it! Why would you not trust them?

      • acockworkorange
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        0
        ·
        9 months ago
        link
        fedilink

        The people of Alabama voted in an election (2014, I think) whether to keep or not the unenforceable law that forbids interracial marriage. More than 40% voted to keep it. Fuck them.

  • SuperDuper
    arrow-up
    116
    arrow-down
    0
    ·
    9 months ago
    edit-2
    9 months ago
    link
    fedilink

    Life sentence for growing some pot. Meanwhile the Jan 6th insurrectionists are getting maybe 2 years, or if you’re a card carrying proud boy terrorist you might be looking at up to 20 years.

    • Jerb322
      arrow-up
      64
      arrow-down
      0
      ·
      9 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      Some guy beat someone so bad they need 24hr supervision, and he got 7 years. Cops get of with paid vacation for shooting or running over: dogs, unarmed adults and children, flash bang babies, drunk driving, beating their SO, planting drugs on innocent people. Did I miss anything?

      War on drugs, no, it’s a war on personal freedoms.

      • stoly
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago
        link
        fedilink

        There are actual recordings from the Nixon Whitehouse where they decided that since they could no longer legally discriminate against people based on race, they’d have to find another way and drugs was it.

      • lolcatnipEnglish
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        0
        ·
        9 months ago
        link
        fedilink

        It’s not even just a war on personal freedoms. It’s a war on anyone the people running the system don’t like. The US has been at war with its own citizens longer than I’ve been alive.

        • stoly
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          0
          ·
          9 months ago
          link
          fedilink

          Well since before it was a country. Remember tar and feathering as a form of political discourse?

      • dangblingus
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        0
        ·
        9 months ago
        link
        fedilink

        A war specifically on Black and Hispanic personal freedoms, at least historically that’s how it began.

      • andrew_bidlaw
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        9 months ago
        edit-2
        9 months ago
        link
        fedilink

        The weird outlier is a recent charge of a guy who assaulted 6 cops and got 5 years. A glitch in the system.

    • Masterblaster
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      9 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      i guess we should take justice into our own hands instead of waiting for someone else to do the right thing.

        • jaybone
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 months ago
          link
          fedilink

          Problem is, that’s what the Jan 6th people thought they were doing.

            • Rivalarrival
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              0
              ·
              9 months ago
              link
              fedilink

              The Jan 6 people made the one critical mistake that a revolutionary must never make: they failed to win. Every other mistake they made was recoverable, but that one damned them.

              • Masterblaster
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                9 months ago
                link
                fedilink

                not sure if your comment was meant with sarcasm, but you’re 100% correct. you have to set every other concern aside and understand that you do whatever it takes to win. whatever. it. takes. if you weren’t prepared to do that, you should have never tried in the first place.

                the J6 people were idiots. they thought that there was some magical lever that, if pulled, would grant them their wishes - kinda like some moron sovereign citizen that thinks magic words will get them out of jail or consequences.

                it just doesn’t work like that. you can’t just capture the capitol and think that wins the game. it’s much deeper. the real revolutionaries will fight thousands of unseen battles in clandestine ways using different tools than torches and pitchforks.

  • Flying Squid
    arrow-up
    104
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    9 months ago
    link
    fedilink

    Try to overthrow the government- 18 months. Grow plants- life sentence.

    America (for the time being), fuck yeah!

  • appel
    arrow-up
    78
    arrow-down
    0
    ·
    9 months ago
    link
    fedilink

    This stuff just makes my blood boil. Those 3 assholes on the parole board are complete sociopaths. There’s absolutely no justice here.

    • Kool_NewtEnglish
      arrow-up
      34
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      Someday we’ll learn that these types of positions are only ever occupied by sociopaths, psychopaths, sadists, and those full of hate. Then we’ll realize that the institutions they are part of were designed by the same type of people. Then hopefully finally we’ll realize that every state institution was designed by this same group that believes they know the right way for everything and feel entitled to force their ways on everyone else.

      • proleEnglish
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        0
        ·
        9 months ago
        edit-2
        9 months ago
        link
        fedilink

        Well, political positions, yes. But there are tons of government employees around the country that are just normal people working at a regulatory agency. The overwhelming majority of them. They’re just doing their job.

        At least for now. SCOTUS is very close to changing that.

        • Kool_NewtEnglish
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          0
          ·
          9 months ago
          link
          fedilink

          Right, there are many employees of the state with no power, these positions I’d expect are mostly not staffed by dark tetrad types. The DMV though, pretty sure that’s staffed by mostly sadists.

    • stoly
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      0
      ·
      9 months ago
      edit-2
      9 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      It’s actually a requirement I think.

      In WA during lockdown, they requested compassionate release of someone who was paralyzed on half his body and confined to a chair. The DOC decided that he was a threat to society and needed to be kept in the COVID greenhouse.

  • roguetrick
    arrow-up
    59
    arrow-down
    0
    ·
    9 months ago
    edit-2
    9 months ago
    link
    fedilink

    That law provides several different levels of trafficking, and Hotchkiss was convicted under the lowest level – having between 2.2 lbs and 100lbs. That weight includes all parts of the plant, root and stem and all.

    40 years, jesus fucking CHRIST.

    • glimse
      arrow-up
      36
      arrow-down
      0
      ·
      9 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      I’m 6400km tall if you include the earth under my feet

      • Klear
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        0
        ·
        9 months ago
        link
        fedilink

        I’m billions of light years tall if you include the space above my head.

        • glimse
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          0
          ·
          9 months ago
          link
          fedilink

          Damn you should play in the NBA

          • PopMyCopEnglish
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            0
            ·
            9 months ago
            link
            fedilink

            I don’t know if he has the mass to play, he sounds like a lightweight.

        • glimse
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          0
          ·
          9 months ago
          link
          fedilink

          Damn they’ll never let me on the rollercoaster now

    • HonoraryMancunianEnglish
      arrow-up
      29
      arrow-down
      0
      ·
      9 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      Who, actually, believes society is better off for caging this man??

      • funkless_eck
        arrow-up
        20
        arrow-down
        0
        ·
        9 months ago
        link
        fedilink

        no one. but a great many people like that it happened

        • wafflez
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          0
          ·
          9 months ago
          link
          fedilink

          The rich for more slave labor?

          • funkless_eck
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            0
            ·
            9 months ago
            link
            fedilink

            yeah and general schadenfreude, racism, hippy-bashing and general reefer madness buffonery.

      • stoly
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        0
        ·
        9 months ago
        link
        fedilink

        Many–there are people whose lives REALLY suck and they can’t imagine them being better so they want to make others’ lives worse. This is how a significant portion of the population votes.

    • ElleChaise
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      0
      ·
      9 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      An old pot grower’s adage goes something like: if the sentencing minimum is for between 1-99 plants, you might as well grow 99.

      People like Bud serve as the real life example for this kind of saying sadly.

    • PikaEnglish
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      0
      ·
      9 months ago
      edit-2
      9 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      This is stupid, why is the lowest charge range so big. 2.2 lb to 100 lb that is a huge range and you’re telling me there is ranges higher than that? He already has life in prison the hell do they do with the higher ranges

    • Maeve
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      And dirt they made sure to water.

  • BlackNo1
    arrow-up
    48
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 months ago
    link
    fedilink

    usa fucking sucksssss especially the south

  • m13
    arrow-up
    42
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 months ago
    link
    fedilink

    The United States is a fascist hellhole.

  • scottywh
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    0
    ·
    9 months ago
    link
    fedilink

    Alabama has an incredible climate for growing outdoor Cannabis, too

    It should literally be everywhere there.

    • m3t00🌎English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      0
      ·
      9 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      a friend in highschool used to collect all the seeds and scatter them around town. de-seeding was part of the low-grade weed ritual. seeds would explode and blow-up your joints or bowls

  • BruceTwarzen
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    0
    ·
    9 months ago
    link
    fedilink

    Dude should try to overthrow the government and attack some police officers, he’ll be back home in 2 to 5 years

  • FlavoredButtHairEnglish
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 months ago
    link
    fedilink

    Remember come election time who is responsible for this. Just like actions, elections have consequences.

    • Wrench
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      0
      ·
      9 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      Or, you know, you could vote Democrats into a super majority, and we could legally remove all the insanely corrupt politicians and judges, and do things like federally legalize weed and pardon non violent weed convictions.