As a non-American, I don’t know exactly how your polling works, but why am I seeing “plan your voting day” or “set a voting strategy” like they’ve done on the Cards Against Humanity voting campaign?

Where I live, it’s just show up on voting day and cast your ballot, or ask for a mail in ballot, or go to a special voting station if you need (or want) to vote early. Is it the same in the US, and this is just getting people to gather those last pieces of information early and put a reminder in the calendar? Or is there more to it than that?

Thanks!

  • sunbrrnslapper
    arrow-up
    154
    arrow-down
    0
    ·
    6 days ago
    link
    fedilink

    Lines can be long, polls have limited hours (often conflicting with work hours), a person may need a ride to the polling location, etc. Some states have stupid rules like you can’t give people in line to vote food or water, which makes standing in line for hours more challenging.

    • undercrustOP
      arrow-up
      108
      arrow-down
      0
      ·
      6 days ago
      link
      fedilink

      Wait, you can’t give people food or water if they’re standing in the line? Why the hell not?

      And hours in line?? What? Why!

      • Soapbox1858English
        arrow-up
        103
        arrow-down
        0
        ·
        6 days ago
        link
        fedilink

        As many have mentioned the real reason is to suppress votes by making the experience miserable.

        The cover story for the rules is to prevent campaigns or other groups from “buying votes” by giving people in line food/water in exchange for a promise to vote for their candidate.

        • undefined
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          0
          ·
          5 days ago
          link
          fedilink

          which is so dumb because I can tell everyone I’m voting for <candidate> then go in there and vote for <other candidate> instead. 😒

          • Red_October
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            0
            ·
            5 days ago
            link
            fedilink

            Sure, but they’re not asking you before they do it. If one candidate has gone on record saying a certain demographic should have their rights stripped, and there’s a district that is populated by mainly that demographic, they don’t need to poll the area to guess who’s going to lose that district.

            • undefined
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              0
              ·
              5 days ago
              edit-2
              5 days ago
              link
              fedilink

              I was responding to:

              prevent campaigns or other groups from “buying votes” by giving people in line food/water in exchange for a promise to vote

              I’m saying that it’s dumb that this is illegal when they have no guarantee the person being offered food/water will vote for the candidate they want.

      • SturgiesYrFase
        arrow-up
        54
        arrow-down
        0
        ·
        6 days ago
        link
        fedilink

        To discourage people from voting. As was pointed out elsewhere, the Republicans only really flourish when a small number of people vote. So they make it as inconvenient as possible for people who are lower income, usually people of colour.

        • TranquilTurbulence
          arrow-up
          25
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          6 days ago
          link
          fedilink

          Wait what? And that sort of things is legal? Are you serious? You know, there are countries where voting is obligatory, and others where it is made as easy as possible.

          • SturgiesYrFase
            arrow-up
            23
            arrow-down
            0
            ·
            6 days ago
            link
            fedilink

            Wait til you learn about Gerrymandering. I’ll not get into it in depth, but essentially the local/state government in the US will set up voting regions to guarantee that one party has a massive advantage.

            • undefined
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              0
              ·
              5 days ago
              edit-2
              5 days ago
              link
              fedilink

              I like how I vividly remember learning about this in middle school and being told it’s illegal, then as an adult I just see it happening???

              • visor841
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                0
                ·
                5 days ago
                link
                fedilink

                It’s only illegal federally to gerrymander to dilute minorities. Otherwise it’s up to the individual states.

            • stoned_ape
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              0
              ·
              5 days ago
              link
              fedilink

              Bruh the shit going on in Ohio this election cycle where LaRose has reworded (see also the abortion amendment where his “summary” was longer than the actual text of the amendment) the ballot to obfuscate the actual intent of Issue 1 to make people vote No which helps consolidate the Republicans grip

              It’s ridiculous. My wife is relatively intelligent and she doesn’t understand the wording on the ballot and I explained to her that despite the reading, a No vote will continue the status quo. Like I’m a free speech kind of guy but just put the damn text on the damn ballot like don’t bullshit us Frankie!

              Fuckin schmucks

              • SturgiesYrFase
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                0
                ·
                5 days ago
                link
                fedilink

                But if they don’t do everything they can to obfuscate the ramifications of voting No then everyone would vote Yes!

                They know what they’re doing is against the wishes of the majority, otherwise they would put the choices in plain language, or weight the obfuscation the other way

          • rsuri
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            0
            ·
            5 days ago
            edit-2
            5 days ago
            link
            fedilink

            Wait what? And that sort of things is legal?

            Technically no, if it can be proven that the goal is racial discrimination specifically. Every so often there’s a lawsuit claiming just that. Problem is, it tends to get resolved by the Supreme Court which is two-thirds chosen by the “let’s make it harder to vote” party.

            • TranquilTurbulence
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              0
              ·
              5 days ago
              link
              fedilink

              Reading this discussion has made me understand a little bit better why America seems to be always on fire

          • FeelzGoodMan420English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            6 days ago
            edit-2
            6 days ago
            link
            fedilink

            That’s cool but the post was clearly about the USA where they have made voting a miserable fucking experience.

      • Red_October
        arrow-up
        48
        arrow-down
        0
        ·
        6 days ago
        link
        fedilink

        Because certain people with power find it advantageous to make it difficult for the people in certain areas to vote. If you know that district isn’t going to vote for you, and morality is a thing that happens to other people, you could make the polling place too small with too few workers.

      • chuckleslord
        arrow-up
        35
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 days ago
        link
        fedilink

        “We hate that poors get to vote in our country. Don’t they know that this was a country founded with the ideals that only landowning white men could vote? Apparently they changed that law at some point, so we just make new ones to make the poors not want to vote. Like depriving them of things they need to live if they choose to do so. It’s what they get for being poors. Johohoho!

        • American lawmakers in poor, conservative states

        In all honesty, it’s fucked. It’s so fucked.

      • Trigger2_2000
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        0
        ·
        5 days ago
        link
        fedilink

        I’m guessing you might be from Canada (Hello up there friend)!

        Because certain groups in power are total pieces of @#$_&-+/!

        Which States Ban Giving Food and Water to Voters at Polling Places?

        Elections in the US didn’t used to be so controversial, but in the last 10 years certain groups/parties have been crying foul (baselessly I might add) about illegal voting.

        You are supposed to be able to go to the polling place on election day and vote. There are limited voting hours (generally about 12 hours), it is not a national holiday (should be), your employer does not have to give you time to vote (paid or not). You might be able to vote via postal mail (but it varies by state what “valid reasons are” to do that).

        The US really needs election reform nation wide.

        • XeroxCool
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          0
          ·
          5 days ago
          link
          fedilink

          A holiday could help but it’s not a real solution. Think of how emergency services will have to stay operational as an essential entity. Now think of the shitty retail companies that will call themselves essential businesses. You may get some compliance from some retail, but not all. Probably not most. Look at every other solemn non-denominational holidays like memorial day or labor day. Not only do stores stay open, but they have sales for those. People work the hardest on labor day! And that is the group least likely to vote and most likely to swing.

          12 hours is usually long enough for people to not be at work at some point, but I’d much rather see a 20-24 hour window. Cover those stuck on double shifts. Cover super commuter workaholics. Cover the person who needed to catch a movie first.

          Or do literally anything else to improve our archaic system. It’s intentionally kept obtuse and atrocious to keep out the people struggling the most while the other end mails a vote from Aruba.

          • whotookkarl
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            0
            ·
            5 days ago
            link
            fedilink

            Recent changes in Michigan extended it from 1 day to over a week, joining several other states offering early voting options.

            “The early voting period begins the second Saturday prior to Election Day and ends the Sunday before an election. However, communities may decide to provide additional days of early voting. Under state law, communities can offer up to 29 days of early voting.

            https://www.michigan.gov/sos/elections/voting/early-in-person-voting

      • Illuminostro
        arrow-up
        29
        arrow-down
        0
        ·
        6 days ago
        link
        fedilink

        So they won’t wait long enough to vote. The excuse used to ban is that they’re being “bribed” with food and water. It’s just pure voter suppression, but who are you going to complain to? The mayor and the police who watch Fox every night?

      • ComradeSharkfuckerEnglish
        arrow-up
        20
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 days ago
        link
        fedilink

        The American political system will do everything it can to prevent poor people from voting

      • Dr. BobEnglish
        arrow-up
        22
        arrow-down
        0
        ·
        6 days ago
        link
        fedilink

        It’s voter suppression. By limiting the number of voting locations and understanding them you make long lines where people will wait for hours to vote. By not allowing food or water to be handed out they hope people will get discouraged and leave the line. The official reason is that it could be construed as a bribe to vote a certain way.

      • dcpDarkMatter
        arrow-up
        20
        arrow-down
        0
        ·
        6 days ago
        link
        fedilink

        Because the people making those rules don’t want those people to vote. They figure, if it’s that much of a hassle, they won’t turn out. Meanwhile, in Republican-strong areas, they have multiple voting locations and very short lines.

        • TranquilTurbulence
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          0
          ·
          6 days ago
          link
          fedilink

          Yikes! And I thought that gerrymandering was playing dirty. This is just next level stuff

      • expr
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        0
        ·
        6 days ago
        link
        fedilink

        In Nebraska, I get my ballot by mail way in advance. I fill it out at my leisure, doing research on candidates as needed. I can then either mail the ballot back or drop it off at one of several locations around town (including any of the public libraries). I haven’t voted in person in years. This method is so much better.

      • captainlezbian
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        0
        ·
        5 days ago
        link
        fedilink

        Because it might be seen as bribery to get them to vote one way. This country has pulled every piece of bullshit in every direction when it comes to voting

    • hendrikEnglish
      arrow-up
      31
      arrow-down
      0
      ·
      6 days ago
      edit-2
      6 days ago
      link
      fedilink

      Wow. That’s a stark contrast to where I live. I don’t have to register or anything. Just bring that notice I got in the mail. And I’ve never waited in line for more than 15-20 minutes. And we germans keep all the supermarkets, shops and most businesses closed on sundays, so voting will just take place on a sunday and it won’t collide with work either

      Does anyboy know why it’s a tuesday in the USA? I guess sunday would at least help people with a regular office job? Malice? Something that was important in the 18th century when you had to travel by horse to the voting place? Or some mundane reason?

      • snooggumsEnglish
        arrow-up
        50
        arrow-down
        0
        ·
        6 days ago
        link
        fedilink

        It is Tuesday for some outdated reason that no longer matters and it is kept as a tradition because it conflicts with working days where minorities and other lower income folks will find it harderr to vote.

        The lines are long in places where Republicans want to suppress the vote, by not providing enough staffing, minimizing voting stations, and throwing in other hurdles. They also oppose early voting snd mail in voting to make it harder for everyone to vote, because their angry voters are more likely to stick it out through those barriers.

        I live in a Republican state that hasn’t gone Dem for president since Nixon, and of course I have never waited more than 5 minutes in line and started voting early when that option was added. I don’t vote Republican, but most of the people do so they haven’t gone as malicious on voter suppression like in the states that have a chance of going Dem.

        • illiEnglish
          arrow-up
          14
          arrow-down
          0
          ·
          6 days ago
          link
          fedilink

          How is thay even legal, wtf?

          • snooggumsEnglish
            arrow-up
            23
            arrow-down
            0
            ·
            6 days ago
            link
            fedilink

            Because the same party doing it is good at repeatedly testing the barriers to discrimination and dismantling laws against it.

            Texas and some other states were not allowed to change voting practices without approval for years due to this kind of thing under the Voting Rights Act. Then SCOTUS overturrned that law

            https://apnews.com/article/voting-rights-act-supreme-court-black-voters-6f840911e360c44fd2e4947cc743baa2

            Within hours of a U.S. Supreme Court decision dismantling a key provision of the Voting Rights Act, Texas lawmakers announced plans to implement a strict voter ID law that had been blocked by a federal court. Lawmakers in Alabama said they would press forward with a similar law that had been on hold.

            The ruling continues to reverberate across the country a decade later, as Republican-led states pass voting restrictions that, in several cases, would have been subject to federal review had the conservative-leaning court left the provision intact. At the same time, the justices have continued to take other cases challenging elements of the landmark 1965 law that was born from the sometimes violent struggle for the right of Black Americans to cast ballots.

            • hendrikEnglish
              arrow-up
              7
              arrow-down
              0
              ·
              6 days ago
              edit-2
              6 days ago
              link
              fedilink

              Thanks for the explanations. I think the Unites States should embrace being founded on the principles of democracy, and once being amongst the leading countries with that And return to being a democracy. Every time I read about some more details, I’m more convinced that one of your major parties doesn’t like democracy, or the original idea behind the USA.

              • snooggumsEnglish
                arrow-up
                10
                arrow-down
                0
                ·
                6 days ago
                edit-2
                6 days ago
                link
                fedilink

                The US was founded on wealthy white male landowners who mostly owned slaves being able to vote, just like their Greek and Roman inspirations.

                Expending that concept to the general population took a couple nearly two centuries, and we still haven’t embraced it. We have sucked at being a democracy the whole time.

                Also, the parties traded the racists in the 60s and 70s. Republicans were the equal rights party prior to the Southern Strategy while the Dems were the racists up to that point, but Republicans have been on the wrong side of history since then.

                • hendrikEnglish
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  0
                  ·
                  5 days ago
                  edit-2
                  5 days ago
                  link
                  fedilink

                  I think democracy as a concept is alright, though. It has some flaws baked in But I don’t think there is a casual relationship to humans being humans and needing centuries to realize women are people, too. And so are people with a different skin color, poor people Deciding if slavery is a good or a bad thing also has a very prominent place in US history. And we here in Europe also didn’t do much better.

                  I’m proud that we left lots of that behind and we’re doing much better now. We’re certainly not done yet, there is still quite some way to go I think it’s just a shame that we can’t do any better. Or that it’ll take decades to get anything productive done, because of the way politics is set up to work. And meanwhile we also have to fight populists, corruption and all the usual annoyances of giving power to people.

            • illiEnglish
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              0
              ·
              6 days ago
              edit-2
              5 days ago
              link
              fedilink

              I’d expect some equality be ensured on federal level for at least federal level stuff. Just wow. I knew US was fucked up, but I somehow always learn there is yet another level to it

              • snooggumsEnglish
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                0
                ·
                6 days ago
                link
                fedilink

                That’s what the Voting Rights Act was

          • nondescripthandle
            arrow-up
            10
            arrow-down
            0
            ·
            6 days ago
            link
            fedilink

            I love seeing people realize the USA is only a Democray for a very specific group of people weather it’s concerning the Judges or the Election process. On top of that thanks to the electoral college if you dont live in a swing state you don’t really get a say. The election will boil down to a few hundred thousand people in a couple states just because of where they live.

            • undefined
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              0
              ·
              5 days ago
              edit-2
              5 days ago
              link
              fedilink

              The swing state thing really makes my blood boil mainly because moving from my shithole red state with the same population as the city I live in now (Los Angeles) my vote means nothing. In fact, I always chuckle when I get political mail here because it’s like “why waste your time?

        • TranquilTurbulence
          arrow-up
          13
          arrow-down
          0
          ·
          6 days ago
          link
          fedilink

          Americans talk so much about democracy, and this is how they treat their voters Reading this thread just makes me sad.

          • Aceticon
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            0
            ·
            5 days ago
            edit-2
            5 days ago
            link
            fedilink

            It’s a well known phenomenon that the more people self-compliment about some great quality they have, the less that is the case.

            A similar thing seems to happen at a political level - the countries were politicians just harp on and on about how great their Democracy is (in the case of the US) or how old it is (in the case of the UK) have the most flawed Democracies (if they even count as Democracies given how far they stray from the “all votes are equal” criteria) whilst in the best Democracies out there (like The Netherlands where they have Proportional Vote) they never talk about how great a Democracy they are.

            I believe it’s called Overcompensation.

            Personally ever since I figured this out I treat such self-complimenting boasts (both at an individual and at a nation level) as big red flags and so far that rule of thumb hasn’t failed me.

            • TranquilTurbulence
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              0
              ·
              5 days ago
              link
              fedilink

              Makes you look at Democratic Republic of the Congo in a new way. If it’s in the name, it has to be important to them, right?

              • Aceticon
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                0
                ·
                5 days ago
                link
                fedilink

                Personally the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea is the one I find that really beats all others in this.

          • BigfishEnglish
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            0
            ·
            5 days ago
            link
            fedilink

            As an American: Me too 😮‍💨

        • Ardor von Heersburg
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          0
          ·
          6 days ago
          link
          fedilink

          Wouldn‘t it be the best thing to make election day a nation wide holiday? Could keep the tradition while also actually allowing people to vote. I doubt that productivity is high on these days nevertheless.

          Has this ever been discussed?

          • thesohoriotsEnglish
            arrow-up
            12
            arrow-down
            0
            ·
            6 days ago
            link
            fedilink

            National holidays don’t apply to private companies, apparently.

              • snooggumsEnglish
                arrow-up
                11
                arrow-down
                0
                ·
                6 days ago
                edit-2
                6 days ago
                link
                fedilink

                Private companies are not obligated to provide any amount of leave, paid or unpaid as a general requirement. Some states may have requirements, but there is no federal requirement and many states have none.

                The one requirement that I know of is allowing an employee two hours to vote on the one voting day every two years if necessary to make it to the polls. I am fairly certain this only applies if their shift is the entirety of the time the polls are open, and it is not required to be paid time.

                • undefined
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  0
                  ·
                  5 days ago
                  link
                  fedilink

                  Your second paragraph lines up with state law in California.

                  • snooggumsEnglish
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    arrow-down
                    0
                    ·
                    5 days ago
                    link
                    fedilink

                    Well shit, I thought that was national since even Kansas has it. It is only law 28 states!

              • thesohoriotsEnglish
                arrow-up
                9
                arrow-down
                0
                ·
                6 days ago
                link
                fedilink

                Federal holidays can be observed by private companies, but then who will run the movie theaters on Christmas for us to go watch CGI robots fight each other? Or serve us fast food on Labor Day? Etc etc. It’s stupid.

                • TranquilTurbulence
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  0
                  ·
                  5 days ago
                  link
                  fedilink

                  Here’s an idea: Have a few weeks of early voting for people who need to work during the actual voting day, which is on Sunday. Yeah, I know it’s radical and this sort of thing will probably start at least one civil war and a century of chaos and destruction.

              • GBU_28English
                arrow-up
                6
                arrow-down
                0
                ·
                6 days ago
                link
                fedilink

                The trick is do you want ANYTHING open on the holiday? Grocery, train station, etc? In America, if anything is open, then the cats out of the bag

          • nondescripthandle
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            0
            ·
            6 days ago
            link
            fedilink

            Poor people voting isn’t good for profits and it’s literally that simple. Neither party care, a few progressive dems do, at least until aipac tries to get rid of them while the most powerful dems stand behind aipac.

          • stinerman [Ohio]English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            0
            ·
            6 days ago
            link
            fedilink

            It has, but there are some people who do not like the idea that everyone can vote.

            Also it being a holiday doesn’t mean everyone gets off work. There is no federal law that says your business can’t be open 365 days per year, nor is there any law that mandates paid time off.

      • originalucifer
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        0
        ·
        6 days ago
        link
        fedilink

        one of the two main parties knows that if ‘everyone’ voted, they would no longer hold any power whatsoever. so they actively prevent democracy by making it harder to vote.

      • MagosInformaticusEnglish
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        0
        ·
        5 days ago
        link
        fedilink

        Federal election times are set by 2 U.S. Code § 7 as 1 day after the 1st Monday in November (of even numbered years). The law is from 1875 and from what I can tell is indeed nominally motivated by the voters’ need to first observe rest day on Sunday and then travel to their polling place. Keeping it and not having a federal holiday coinciding with it is largely aimed at keeping voter turnout low.

      • Altima NEOEnglish
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        0
        ·
        6 days ago
        edit-2
        6 days ago
        link
        fedilink

        In contrast, in Oregon, we just vote by mail. Fill out you ballot at your leisure, drop it off in the mail box or ballot box by the due date, and you’re set. Also the ballot boxes are all over the place. City Hall, the post office, the library, etc.

      • Trigger2_2000
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        0
        ·
        5 days ago
        link
        fedilink

        The reasons I was given for first Tuesday in November are:

        1. After “pay day” at beginning of month (not everyone gets paid on the first of the month though).
        2. So you will be sobered up from your weekend drunk.

        The idea behind #1 is that it should be harder to bribe you if you have recently been paid. The reason behind #2 is that you will be sober when you vote.

        Also, in my state at least, alcohol sales are prohibited while the polls are open for voting.

      • GBU_28English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        0
        ·
        6 days ago
        link
        fedilink

        You generally register when you get your license with new address here but the Crux is this gets complicated if you move from state to statethere is no federal voting registry, you register to your state.