• zoostation
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    29
    ·
    9 months ago
    link
    fedilink

    Yes, like I said the bill is terrible. But the headline is wrong. The bill does not define someone as a terrorist just for being Hispanic.

    • FuglyDuckEnglish
      arrow-up
      32
      arrow-down
      0
      ·
      9 months ago
      edit-2
      9 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      SECTION 1. NEW LAW A new section of law to be codified in the Oklahoma Statutes as Section 1268.9 of Title 21, unless there is created a duplication in numbering, reads as follows: Any person who:

      1. Is of Hispanic descent living within the state of Oklahoma;
      2. Is a member of a criminal street gang as such term is defined in subsection F of Section 856 of Title 21 of the Oklahoma Statutes; and
      3. Has been convicted of a gang-related offense enumerated in paragraphs one (1) through sixteen (16) of subsection F of Section 856 of Title 21 of the Oklahoma Statute

      I read the law. under this proposed law, any one who is a member of a gang, and has been convicted of gang crimes is not a terrorist, but any such person who also happens to be Hispanic Is a terrorist.

      When called out for it he didn’t apologize, but then proceeded to suggest “illegals” as an alternative term, as if Hispanics are illegals. This asshole is so fucking racist, he doesn’t understand what the issue is.

      • CowlitzEnglish
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        0
        ·
        9 months ago
        link
        fedilink

        What the actual fuck is wrong with this country? Him and the dumbshits that elected him need to face some actual adversity in life. Pathetic excuses for humans or americans.

    • VeedemEnglish
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      0
      ·
      9 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      But it does if two people, one white and one Hispanic, meet the other two criteria. Then one is not a terrorist and one is simply because they are Hispanic.

    • atx_aquarian
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      15
      ·
      9 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      You’re not wrong. The headline’s misrepresentation is needlessly distracting. The bill is still racist; why specify ancestry at all?