For me, it was that the Internet never forgets and that you should never enter your real name. In my opinion, both of these rules are now completely ignored.

  • hightrix
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    0
    ·
    17 hours ago
    edit-2
    17 hours ago
    link
    fedilink

    I’d argue this is the opposite of what was asked.

    In the early days, no one would post sources or attribute “stuff” to anyone. We’d all just share what we thought were cool pictures.

    Now, everyone gets mad when you dont post the name of the artist and their socials.

    • Jordan117English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      0
      ·
      9 hours ago
      link
      fedilink

      This might be more of a blogosphere-era thing I guess. Even when most people blogging did it for pleasure rather than work, it was always considered polite to “hat tip” (h/t) the source of a given link, if you happened to find it on someone else’s site.

    • MonkeMischief
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      0
      ·
      13 hours ago
      edit-2
      13 hours ago
      link
      fedilink

      I would posit a big part of this is because early-net days were primarily for just socializing and sharing cool stuff (heck yeah, I miss it.) Artists probably didn’t make a majority of their living through the 'net. If something was shared it was likely just “I think this is cool, folks!

      Nowadays, to say the Internet is heavily commercialized would be a massive understatement. Every little interaction is monetized. Many people make their entire living through e-commerce. It’s just how things went.

      Meanwhile you have a billion faceless sandfleas with repost-botfarms trying to hustle cash with the stupidest methods possible.

      You’ll see entire channels where animations or paintings or whatever are circulated on socials like youtube, twitter, or tiktok with the artist tag conveniently cropped out (if there was one).

      Some are outright stealing the work for profit (selling tshirts or something), while others are just using it to farm clicks, which is also a route to profit.

      The artist who made the work is cheated, perhaps unaware, as some click-grifter gets all the attention. And that sucks. :( As an artist myself, I try to make sure I share the sources for stuff now, because recognition is a form of thanks, at the very least.

      I miss the sharing internetthe attention economy has basically turned the internet into a sociological illustration of “The paperclip apocalypse”. :(

    • UltraGiGaGiganticEnglish
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      0
      ·
      17 hours ago
      link
      fedilink

      What people are really mad about us the fact that artists are (and always have been) starving. We throw so much food away, let the artists cook for fucks sake.