Lee DunatoTechnology@lemmy.worldEnglish·9 months agocross-posted to: technology@lemmy.worldNightshade, the free tool that ‘poisons’ AI models, is now available for artists to use(venturebeat.com)external-linkarrow-up1872arrow-down146message-square281fedilink
arrow-up1826arrow-down1external-linkNightshade, the free tool that ‘poisons’ AI models, is now available for artists to use(venturebeat.com)Lee DunatoTechnology@lemmy.worldEnglish·9 months agocross-posted to: technology@lemmy.worldmessage-square281fedilink
minus-squareMiaouEnglisharrow-up5arrow-down0·9 months agolinkfedilinkProbably the reason they’re moving to a Web offering. They could just take down the binary files and be gpl compliant, this whole thing is so stupid
minus-squareKusimulkkuEnglisharrow-up5arrow-down0·9 months agolinkfedilinkI think that’s what AGPL tries to prevent
minus-squareladEnglisharrow-up4arrow-down0·9 months agolinkfedilinkYes, but if the code they took is not AGPL then this loophole still applies
minus-squareKusimulkkuEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down0·9 months agolinkfedilinkYes, I meant more that AGPL was created to plug this particular loophole. As in, if it was AGPL, they couldn’t do this.
minus-squareladEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down0·9 months agoedit-29 months agolinkfedilinkThat’s true Although I personally am not a fan of licences this strict, MIT+Apache2.0 seems good enough for me. Of course, that might change with time and precedents like this 😅
Probably the reason they’re moving to a Web offering. They could just take down the binary files and be gpl compliant, this whole thing is so stupid
I think that’s what AGPL tries to prevent
Yes, but if the code they took is not AGPL then this loophole still applies
Yes, I meant more that AGPL was created to plug this particular loophole. As in, if it was AGPL, they couldn’t do this.
That’s true
Although I personally am not a fan of licences this strict, MIT+Apache2.0 seems good enough for me. Of course, that might change with time and precedents like this 😅