• FaceDeer
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    9 months ago
    link
    fedilink

    No, that’s a false dichotomy, there are other choices. Such as “help disadvantaged people regardless of their genetics. I reject the “but it’s too hard” argument. If racial discrimination or gender discrimination or discrimination based on orientation is wrong, then it’s wrong. Don’t put an asterisk on it with a list of types that it’s okay for.

      • FaceDeer
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        0
        ·
        9 months ago
        edit-2
        9 months ago
        link
        fedilink

        I already did that in the comment you’re responding to:

        Such as “help disadvantaged people regardless of their genetics.

        Or two comments previous to this one:

        Why not just “disadvantaged people”? That takes race out of the equation entirely, and everyone is satisfied.

        How often do you need it repeated?