I have seen many people in this community either talking about switching to Brave, or people who are actively using Brave. I would like to remind people that Brave browser (and by extension their search engine) is not privacy-centric whatsoever.

Brave was already ousted as spyware in the past and the company has made many decisions that are questionable at best. For example, Brave made a cryptocurrency which they then added to a rewards program that is built into the browser to encourage you to enable ads that are controlled by Brave.

Edit: Please be aware that the spyware article on Brave (and the rest of the browsers on the site) is outdated and may not reflect the browser as it is today.

After creating this cryptocurrency and rewards program, they started inserting affiliate codes into URL’s. Prior to this they had faked fundraising for popular social media creators.

Do these decisions seem like ones a company that cares about their users (and by extension their privacy) would make? I’d say the answer is a very clear no.

One last thing, Brave illegally promoted an eToro affiliate program making a fortune from its users who will likely lose their money.

Edit: To the people commenting saying how Brave has a good out-of-the-box experience compared to other browsers, yes, it does. However, this is not a warning for your average person, this is a warning for people who actively care about their privacy and don’t mind configuring their browser to maximize said privacy.

  • AphoticDev
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    0
    ·
    1 year ago
    link
    fedilink

    Let’s not forget one of the biggest investors is a right-wing billionaire who runs a corporate intelligence agency that contracts with the DoD. And the only proof we have that he doesn’t collect data on Brave’s users is the questionable word of the devs.

    • ZikejiEnglish
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      0
      ·
      1 year ago
      link
      fedilink

      Brave has been off limits for me ever since I saw my QAnon nutjob father using it lol.

      • aaathats3asEnglish
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        0
        ·
        1 year ago
        link
        fedilink

        That’s dumb.

        Would you stop drinking water just because Hitler drank it too?

    • KatlahOPEnglish
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago
      edit-2
      1 year ago
      link
      fedilink

      I would appreciate if we don’t bring politics into the conversation. They are completely subjective and only serve to stray away from the original point.

      Edit:

      Yes, I’m aware I’m in the wrong here.

      • xantoxis
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        0
        ·
        1 year ago
        link
        fedilink

        If you know you’re in the wrong, delete the comment, or at least strikethrough everything you have changed your mind about.

        The people who downvoted you have already moved on, they don’t need or care about an apology and won’t see it.

        • KatlahOPEnglish
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago
          link
          fedilink

          I won’t delete the comment as that also deletes (not really but hides) the replies. As for strikethrough, I don’t really think it matters that much.

          • KissakiEnglish
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            0
            ·
            5 months ago
            link
            fedilink

            I don’t really think it matters that much

            When I read your comment I couldn’t see what specifically you consider yourself being wrong about. Striking through could have clarified. Without it, I would have preferred the comment as it was. Then it at least makes sense within the thread and makes a clear statement. (Whether one agrees with it or not.)

      • silent_water [she/her]English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        0
        ·
        1 year ago
        link
        fedilink

        how can privacy ever be stripped of political content? it’s inherently about social forces - ie politics.

      • AphoticDev
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        0
        ·
        1 year ago
        link
        fedilink

        I would appreciate it if conservatives stopped trying to strip away our rights, including the right to privacy.

      • AOCapitulator [they/them, she/her]English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        0
        ·
        1 year ago
        edit-2
        1 year ago
        link
        fedilink

        untrue, politics affects the shape of everything, if we don’t ‘make it political’ we let whatever political lean already is there continue. thats not apolitical, thats apathy

        that said thanks for the post, good to know!

      • Helmic [he/him]English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago
        link
        fedilink

        aren’t you on a fucking anarchist instance, ding dong? shut the fuck up, we don’t do “apolitical” theatrics here.