I left the headline like the original, but I see this as a massive win for Apple. The device is ridiculously expensive, isn’t even on sale yet and already has 150 apps specifically designed for that.

If Google did this, it wouldn’t even get 150 dedicated apps even years after launch (and the guaranteed demise of it) and even if it was something super cheap like being made of fucking cardboard.

This is something that as an Android user I envy a lot from the Apple ecosystem.

Apple: this is a new feature => devs implement them in their apps the very next day even if it launches officially in 6 months.

Google: this is a new feature => devs ignore it, apps start to support it after 5-6 Android versions

  • intensely_human
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    0
    ·
    9 months ago
    link
    fedilink

    So what number of apps is it?

    “Only 150+ provides zero information regarding quantity

    • kevincox
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      0
      ·
      9 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      Well it does say n >= 150. But the phrasing makes it sound like it is trying to imply that this is a small number.

      • intensely_human
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        0
        ·
        9 months ago
        link
        fedilink

        Exactly. The statement doesn’t validate in the sense check, making the >= 150 back into a maybe because I’m uncertain if it makes sense at all.