• Orbituary
    arrow-up
    36
    arrow-down
    0
    ·
    9 months ago
    link
    fedilink

    Fucking why? Say why? The article was useless.

    • oursEnglish
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      9 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      The why doesn’t seem to be public. Speculation is a military test, perhaps some radar test.

      • gregorumEnglish
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        9 months ago
        link
        fedilink

        radar doesn’t make things radioactive

            • Breve
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              0
              ·
              9 months ago
              link
              fedilink

              Yes, microwaves are non-ionizing radiation. I would not suggest sticking your head in your microwave while it’s running though.

              • gregorumEnglish
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                9 months ago
                link
                fedilink

                they don’t run with the door open

                • Skunk
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  arrow-down
                  0
                  ·
                  9 months ago
                  edit-2
                  9 months ago
                  link
                  fedilink

                  You now know a place in the world where you can overfly a giant microwave. Fo science!

              • Madison420
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                0
                ·
                9 months ago
                link
                fedilink

                It doesn’t say ionizing either bud. Radar at close up or very high levels can fuckup avionics leading to crashes.

                If it were ionizing they would probably say more because wind in that area isn’t constant direction.

            • freagleEnglish
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              0
              ·
              9 months ago
              link
              fedilink

              Non ionizing radiation means it doesn’t produce free radicals through destruction of chemical bonds. Any type of radiation that interacts with a material and has a high enough ERP will heat that thing up. Cell phone spectrum is non ionizing but the high powered towers can still cook the brain inside a skull.

        • orclev
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          9 months ago
          link
          fedilink

          It didn’t say that it would make anything radioactive, it said there was a radiation hazard. Radar is in fact radiation, it’s just non-ionizing which means that unless you’re dealing with massive power levels it’s generally safe to be around. If they’re warning of an extreme radiation hazard it’s either not radar, or they’re pumping a ridiculous amount of power into it.

        • PowerCrazyEnglish
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          9 months ago
          link
          fedilink

          No one said anything about radioactive though.

    • Skunk
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      0
      ·
      9 months ago
      edit-2
      9 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      Navy, Air force or something is probably playing with the new Space Fence that is on Kwajalein (or any of the shit ton of radars they have over there).

      2.69MW radiated power in the microwave band could be enough to make any PAX aboard an aircraft into a way too hot pocket of meat.

      • CrackhappyEnglish
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        0
        ·
        9 months ago
        link
        fedilink

        Goddamnit, now I’m hungry and I’m out of hot pockets.

    • virrEnglish
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      0
      ·
      9 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      Says to contact base to deconflict with radiation hazard. Which would suggest it isn’t nuclear radiation as that would just be contamination that isn’t under control and able to be deconflicted with. Probably a powerful radar or electromagnetic weapon.

      • hotspur
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        0
        ·
        9 months ago
        link
        fedilink

        The radiation warning is near a different atoll, so hard to say if the above is related or not, but it’s kinda blowing my mind how limited reporting is on the subject. It feels like it’s being suppressed in English language media.

        • nekandro
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          9 months ago
          link
          fedilink

          The US doesn’t want to draw attention to the absolute fuckfest that their nuclear testing wrought on the world.

          The Soviets too, but at least the Soviets bombed bumfuck nowhere in Siberia.

          • hotspur
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            0
            ·
            9 months ago
            link
            fedilink

            Yeah that’s certainly what it seems like.

  • robocall
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 months ago
    link
    fedilink

    IIRC there was a giant rouge wave there recently and it flooded a US military base

    • Tylerdurdon
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      IIRC there was a giant rouge wave there recently and it flooded a US military base

      Just how much lipstick ended up there? Jeez!