• SonnyVabitch
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    0
    ·
    9 months ago
    link
    fedilink

    What’s the intended purpose of the higher hood? Cars exist that are safer for pedestrians, we should stigmatise those who choose not to opt for them.

    • Rivalarrival
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago
      edit-2
      9 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      Effective crumple zones, larger engine, higher engine increasing ground clearance necessary for longer vehicles. Driver and passenger safety: lower hoods throw deer, elk, and moose into the passenger compartment.

      How often are pedestrians involved in collisions? How often are they seriously injured? How often are driver and passenger involved in collisions, and seriously injured? Because there is always at least one occupant present and there is rarely a pedestrian involved, occupant safety is a far more important consideration than pedestrian safety. We can justify removing sharp, penetrating contours from the front of the vehicle, but we can’t justify anything that increases risks to occupants.

      I haul 6 customers, 3 crew members, and a 5000lb trailer with a Suburban on up to 9 trips a week. Ideally, I’d have a 4th crew member to help out, but I already have to throw one of the crewmembers in the back, in a jump seat behind the 3rd row, because a suburban only seats 8.

      No amount of social stigma against SUVs is going to convince me to go with something smaller.

      • SonnyVabitch
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago
        link
        fedilink

        Mate you need a fucking bus. In your specific case this fugly piece of shit might actually make sense.

        • Rivalarrival
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          0
          ·
          9 months ago
          link
          fedilink

          We had an 11-passenger van. It kept getting stuck in the slightest mud. Wasn’t fun.