• Hello_there
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    9 months ago
    link
    fedilink

    Because NH got their panties in a twist and decided that their miniscule state needs to be first? They can go fuck off.

    • givesomefucksEnglish
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      30
      ·
      9 months ago
      edit-2
      9 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      Nope.

      Because there wasn’t enough time for NH to change their state law

      DNC and Biden got so mad a state wouldn’t violate state law to help him in an election, they stripped the state of their say in who the candidate was. And it’s a total coincidence he got his ass kicked there last primary

      But it’s cool, because he legitimately is still better than trump, and even though that difference keeps shrinking, no one is allowed to complain about Biden because trump exists

      • Telodzrum
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        9 months ago
        link
        fedilink

        Because there wasn’t enough time for NH to change their state law

        They had a year’s notice. The rulemaking process began last winter.

        • givesomefucksEnglish
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          11
          ·
          9 months ago
          link
          fedilink

          Do you think the leaders of the state democratic party are in complete control of the laws in NH?

          I’d think of all people, Biden wouldnt expect politicians to rush into anything

          Or anyone to ever change a politicians mind on how to vote.

          • Telodzrum
            arrow-up
            12
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            9 months ago
            link
            fedilink

            They had adequate notice. The state cannot cling to an imagined relevancy and hold a party hostage. The legislature chose not to act and therefore their constituents don’t get to participate in the Democratic Primary.

            Seems pretty straightforward to me.

            • givesomefucksEnglish
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              11
              ·
              9 months ago
              link
              fedilink

              Seems pretty straightforward to me

              Republicans say that about all kinds of crazy rationalizations

              Most people who are against democracy feel like democracy isn’t very important as long as their team wins in fact.

              But I’ve found engaging with that type of people is rarely productive, regardless of what they consider their team.

      • 𝔇𝔦𝔬
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        26
        ·
        9 months ago
        link
        fedilink

        You’re shouting in to a screeching void, haha. These degenerate buffoons don’t care, or want, the truth and figure the down vote arrow is a sword and that it actually deters you.

        • givesomefucksEnglish
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          18
          ·
          9 months ago
          link
          fedilink

          It turns out 30 years of dragging the Democratic party to the left lost us as many voters as we gained, and now a bunch of “Democrats” act a lot like Republicans and share the same morals

          What’s crazy is if they had stayed active in the Republican party, they could have actually kept the Republicans somewhat moderate.

          Instead them leaving just concentrated the crazy, and turned 1/3 of the country away from voting.

          The only ones that won from Dems courting Republican voters was conservative extremists. Everyone else lost.