• helenslunchEnglish
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    9 months ago
    link
    fedilink

    You have it backwards. It’s not an inherent problem of DRM because it’s not a requirement for it to have DRM forever.

    • TwilightVulpineEnglish
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      DRM doesn’t purge itself automatically. I don’t know how to spell it any clearer but if the problem is that DRM continues to exist, and it is solved when DRM is removed, then DRM itself is the problem.

      And I speak as someone who lost my official purchase of Tron Evolution to outdated DRM.

      I don’t think you are arguing in favor of cracking groups, as much as I’m appreciative of them.

      • helenslunchEnglish
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        9 months ago
        link
        fedilink

        DRM doesn’t purge itself automatically.

        It doesn’t have to.

        I don’t know how to spell it any clearer but if the problem is that DRM continues to exist, and it is solved when DRM is removed, then DRM itself is the problem.

        Once again you have it backwards. If the DRM is removed then the problem you cited never existed and there’s no problem to be solved.

        And I speak as someone who lost my official purchase of Tron Evolution

        I don’t understand what purpose your anecdotes are supposed to serve here.

        • TwilightVulpineEnglish
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 months ago
          link
          fedilink

          Oh boy, I wonder what’s the relevance of being a first-hand witness of what happens when DRM that doesn’t purge itself, doesn’t get removed and loses support. I wonder how differently that would have gone if DRM had never been used instead.

          Welp, who knows what’s the point of it all. A complete mystery huh 🤷‍♂️

          • helenslunchEnglish
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            9 months ago
            link
            fedilink

            God forbid you should actually explain it rather than acting like an ass and ignoring the question.

            • TwilightVulpineEnglish
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              9 months ago
              link
              fedilink

              I have been finding out that tiring my fingers with people who only pretend to be discussing but gloss over what’s being said is a waste of time.

              I’m acting like an ass because you are acting like an ass. Isn’t it obvious how relevant it is to bring up how DRM personally affected me? Do you actually have a reason to say why losing a game I have bought isn’t actually the fault of DRM, or are you just going to pretend it doesn’t matter? Be it me or anyone else, we can still access games that were abandoned by the developers just fine, as long as DRM doesn’t get in the way,

              If you are gonna repeat yourself with “Once again you have it backwards” don’t even bother. If you really mean to talk it out, don’t avoid the point.

              • helenslunchEnglish
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                9 months ago
                edit-2
                9 months ago
                link
                fedilink

                I have been finding out that tiring my fingers with people who only pretend to be discussing but gloss over what’s being said is a waste of time.

                What are you suggesting that I supposedly “glossed over”?

                Isn’t it obvious how relevant it is to bring up how DRM personally affected me?

                It’s obviously not obvious, like at all. I mean if your intention was to create an emotional argument and tell me that you can’t be objective, then mission accomplished. That’s the only takeaway I have without further explanation.

                Do you actually have a reason to say why losing a game I have bought isn’t actually the fault of DRM

                Uhhhh I’ve already explained the reason. It seems you may have glossed over it.

                If you are gonna repeat yourself with “Once again you have it backwards” don’t even bother.

                What words would you prefer I use when you make the same mistake twice?

                If you really mean to talk it out, don’t avoid the point.

                Again I’ll ask what point it is that you think I’ve avoided?

                • TwilightVulpineEnglish
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  9 months ago
                  link
                  fedilink

                  And here’s why being sarcastic was the right choice. Pointing out the witnessed practical material consequences of DRM is just being “emotional” because for whatever reason you think I’m not allowed to be upset about what I lost, which you have given no argument to prove it doesn’t happen, or how to prevent or revert it.

                  Funny how you quoted every single line except this part

                  we can still access games that were abandoned by the developers just fine, as long as DRM doesn’t get in the way

                  Which points out that you can’t simply scratch it to company neglect, when neglect alone doesn’t take games away from customers. DRM does.

                  How forgetful of you to miss that part, after being so confused about what you might have glossed over.

                  Oh well, anyway goodbye.

                  • helenslunchEnglish
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    2
                    ·
                    9 months ago
                    edit-2
                    9 months ago
                    link
                    fedilink

                    Pointing out the witnessed practical material consequences of DRM is just being “emotional” because for whatever reason you think I’m not allowed to be upset about what I lost

                    As I just explained in the comment you replied to, since you repeatedly refuse to provide any other explanation or justification, I’m left to make assumptions. You’re totally allowed to be upset. “Upset” is an emotion and not an explanation for why you provided a personal anecdote.

                    Funny how you quoted every single line except this part

                    I only quoted the relevant parts of your comments that I replied to. This one I replied to about 12 comments up. Just as a reminder, since you seem to have forgotten, I said “It’s not an inherent problem of DRM because it’s not a requirement for it to have DRM forever.

                    Which points out that you can’t simply scratch it to company neglect, when neglect alone doesn’t take games away from customers. DRM does.

                    You can’t simply scratch it to DRM, when DRM alone doesn’t take games away from customers either. Company neglect is required. You need both.