Sexually explicit AI-generated images of Taylor Swift have been circulating on X (formerly Twitter) over the last day in the latest example of the proliferation of AI-generated fake pornography and the challenge of stopping it from spreading.

X’s policies regarding synthetic and manipulated media and nonconsensual nudity both explicitly ban this kind of content from being hosted on the platform.

  • FfaerieOxide
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    0
    ·
    9 months ago
    link
    fedilink

    if you’re using it in a metaphorical sense or the religious sense

    There’s a difference?

    • NattyNatty2x4
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      0
      ·
      9 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      Well I’ve never heard of a religious person claiming AI could have a soul in the religious sense, and “soul” has other meanings than the religiously literal one, so yes?

      • FfaerieOxide
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        0
        ·
        9 months ago
        link
        fedilink

        Well how many and what difference sorts of religious people have you come across?
        People hear “religious” and seem equate it with “Abrahamic malarkey it isn’t couth to call folks on.

        “Religiously literal” seems a contradiction of terms a well. There is truth and there is ways to understand and to convey that truth.