“Systematic reviews of controlled clinical studies of treatments used by chiropractors have found no evidence that chiropractic manipulation is effective, with the possible exception of treatment for back pain.[8] A 2011 critical evaluation of 45 systematic reviews concluded that the data included in the study “fail[ed] to demonstrate convincingly that spinal manipulation is an effective intervention for any condition.[10] Spinal manipulation may be cost-effective for sub-acute or chronic low back pain, but the results for acute low back pain were insufficient.[11] No compelling evidence exists to indicate that maintenance chiropractic care adequately prevents symptoms or diseases.[12]

  • Alien Nathan EdwardEnglish
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    0
    ·
    11 months ago
    link
    fedilink

    it’s an interesting decision to exclude

    with the possible exception of treatment for back pain.

    and

    Spinal manipulation may be cost-effective for sub-acute or chronic low back pain

    from the title here

    • ironeagl
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      0
      ·
      11 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      Right? I feel like that is 90% of the reason to get it.