The term is quite over used in my opinion, it is very often used in hyperbole. Whether it is in terms of popularity and driving traffic to a website or a threat said to break the Internet, it doesn’t seem to live up to the meaning of the term.

  • Bizarroland
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 months ago
    edit-2
    9 months ago
    link
    fedilink

    Yeah, let a nuclear bomb go off in any American city with over 50,000 residents.

    That would probably do it

    • UsernameblankfaceOP
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      At that point, the EMP would wipe out some important components of the Internet as well as overloading whatever is not directly affected.

      • shalafiEnglish
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        0
        ·
        9 months ago
        link
        fedilink

        LOL, the internet was invented specifically to route communications around nuclear bomb blasts.

        You got me wondering though, things have changed a lot since DARPANET. Taking out Amazon US-EAST-1 would leave a massive hole in the internet.

        • JDubbleu
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          0
          ·
          8 months ago
          link
          fedilink

          If you hit us-east-1 and us-west-2 I truly believe 95% of Western websites would not be fully functional. Most people either rely on, or rely on a service that in some way relies on those regions. Every time Lambda has gone down in IAD it takes with it many ordering applications and tons of physical badging systems around the country.