• hrosts
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      0
      ·
      1 year ago
      link
      fedilink

      Why would anyone do that? Wokeness is rad and cool, while tankies love to do fascist apologia, which is highly unwoke

        • hrosts
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          0
          ·
          1 year ago
          link
          fedilink

          Every time I criticize tankies they:

          1. Lie about what I said
          2. Pretend I’m talking about all communists. If I wanted to do so, I would use the term “communists”. But I don’t see a reason to attack the group I myself belong to
          3. Try to “no U” with irrelevant insinuations
          • ThereRisesARedStar [she/her, they/them]English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            0
            ·
            1 year ago
            edit-2
            1 year ago
            link
            fedilink

            Oh, which successful communists are you talking about?

            Also, double genocide theory being holocaust trivialization still applies as it refers to calling the USSR fascist, if you think it is an irrelevant insuniation take it up with the Jewish holocaust scholars.

            • hrosts
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              0
              ·
              1 year ago
              link
              fedilink

              As I said to the person below, learn reading comprehension or fuck off. I don’t want to engage in a conversation when I’m repeatedly being gaslit on what I said.

                • hrosts
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  arrow-down
                  0
                  ·
                  1 year ago
                  link
                  fedilink

                  It’s impossible to insult successful communists, as there are none. Unless you lower your bar enough to ignore glaring issues like ethnic cleansing of “unloyal” peoples and recreation of the capitalist mode of production.

                  I’m not interested in the “no U” back-and-forth. If you want to defend online tankie community producing prominent fascists, then do so without deflecting. If you don’t, then stop acting indignant

        • hrosts
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          0
          ·
          1 year ago
          link
          fedilink

          Non-sequitur, I have nothing to reply to

            • hrosts
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              0
              ·
              1 year ago
              link
              fedilink

              Please learn reading comprehension

              • AntiOutsideAktion [he/him]English
                arrow-up
                0
                arrow-down
                0
                ·
                1 year ago
                edit-2
                1 year ago
                link
                fedilink

                tankies love to do fascist apologia

                I am quoting you here.

                This is you committing the exact act being described in that article.

                That makes it a direct reply to the exact thing you said.

                Comment?

                • hrosts
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  arrow-down
                  0
                  ·
                  1 year ago
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago
                  link
                  fedilink

                  Please learn reading comprehension in regards the article in question. Or to my message. You seem to have trouble understanding at least one of the two

                  • AntiOutsideAktion [he/him]English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    0
                    ·
                    1 year ago
                    link
                    fedilink

                    Please learn reading comprehension in regards the article in question.

                    In regards to the article in question.