• smileyheadEnglish
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    8 months ago
    link
    fedilink

    As if they didn’t learned their lessor with Twitter.

    • fr0gEnglish
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      0
      ·
      8 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      I’m curious what lesson learned from twitter easily also applies to bluesky, as that’s genuinely not very clear to me.

      • smileyheadEnglish
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 months ago
        edit-2
        8 months ago
        link
        fedilink

        That going into corporate, VC funded, centralization focused and privately controlled social network is not good long-term idea.

        Myself I have nothing against profit itself, but the relationship of how single entity can manage network.

        • fr0gEnglish
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          0
          ·
          8 months ago
          link
          fedilink

          But they’re (allegedly soon) federated and say they want to give control of the protocol over to an independent standards body. So like, half of the stuff you’re saying might not even really apply here.

          • smileyheadEnglish
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            0
            ·
            8 months ago
            link
            fedilink

            It’s the mindset. Standard bodies already have plenty of protocols established, with ActivityPub being the latest trend implemented in dozens of different federated apps. XMPP for real time data flow or (not yet standardized) Matrix for shared graph databases. Bluesky is another XKCD 927.

            I won’t expect anything great from a social service from the start hosted on Amazon AWS, with domain bought from Google Domains, developed on Microsoft GitHub, announcing app first on Apple AppStore and not supporting basic decentralization-friendly things like IPv6.

          • maness300English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            0
            ·
            8 months ago
            link
            fedilink

            Does this mean Mastodon users will be able to interact with Bluesky users?

            • fr0gEnglish
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              0
              ·
              8 months ago
              link
              fedilink

              Not inherently. But since both Mastodon and Bluesky use some sort of public protocol, it is possible that people will develop some bridging software that allows both protocols to talk to each other. I think some people are already trying to build something like that, but I have no idea how well it will work/what the trade-offs will be. Maybe not every feature can be easily translated between the protocols.