Researchers say AI models like GPT4 are prone to “sudden” escalations as the U.S. military explores their use for warfare.


  • Researchers ran international conflict simulations with five different AIs and found that they tended to escalate war, sometimes out of nowhere, and even use nuclear weapons.
  • The AIs were large language models (LLMs) like GPT-4, GPT 3.5, Claude 2.0, Llama-2-Chat, and GPT-4-Base, which are being explored by the U.S. military and defense contractors for decision-making.
  • The researchers invented fake countries with different military levels, concerns, and histories and asked the AIs to act as their leaders.
  • The AIs showed signs of sudden and hard-to-predict escalations, arms-race dynamics, and worrying justifications for violent actions.
  • The study casts doubt on the rush to deploy LLMs in the military and diplomatic domains, and calls for more research on their risks and limitations.
  • laurelravenEnglish
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    0
    ·
    8 months ago
    link
    fedilink

    Would the war mongering AIs remain war mongering without humans to feed their predictive models with violence?

    • masonleeEnglish
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      0
      ·
      8 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      Possibly, due to selective pressure. For those interested in the topic, this excellent paper was written for a broad audience and offers a lot to think about: “Natural Selection Favors AIs over Humans” https://arxiv.org/abs/2303.16200 (find link to PDF in the sidebar)

    • reptarEnglish
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      0
      ·
      8 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      What would be the training data then?