• The Snark UrgeEnglish
    arrow-up
    165
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago
    link
    fedilink

    Even the basic - operator so rarely works as intended in any search bar anymore. I used to be able to ferret out anything from mountains of results that way. Now it just ignores the operator.

    • Shiggles
      arrow-up
      72
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      Something something you are the product.

    • Neato
      arrow-up
      69
      arrow-down
      0
      ·
      10 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      Quote marks to search for a specific phrase in order doesn’t work either. I remember in high school in the very early aughts being taught these operators. Fucking shameful.

      • The Snark UrgeEnglish
        arrow-up
        35
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago
        link
        fedilink

        It ain’t the innovation capitalists promised us, is it? Handicap the search engine so that people spend more time seeing ads, why not.

      • brbposting
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago
        link
        fedilink

        Quotation marks work well for me, still, after all these years, as their 2022 blog post claims.

        They’ll find “him. But” when you search “him but”.

        They’ll find “is not” when you search “isn’t”.

        Saw them work in a singular and unscientific test a week ago.

        One search to try on your favorite engine:

        “they had spent all day waiting outside the double doors”

        https://sh.itjust.works/pictrs/image/581b1066-a882-4bad-90ca-30e70b59df74.jpeg

        Google, Yandex, and Bing all pull it off. DuckDuckGo fails.

        Ah, maybe you’re referring to this: on mobile, you have to ignore Google results below the DMCA removal notice. On desktop - none of those spammy “tiles” with video content and the like. On mobile - yes, after the 100% exact results, you get their attempts at hooking you into staying on the site.

        • /home/pineapplelover
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          0
          ·
          10 months ago
          link
          fedilink

          I wonder why it works on bing and not ddg. I’ve also noticed using operators on ddg is not effective

    • theneverfoxEnglish
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      0
      ·
      10 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      There was this sweet spot where you could both ask it a question in almost natural language, but also use very simple operators to fine tune your results massively.

      Then SEO became an offshoot of marketing, and it started to get worse and worse, until 90% of it was sponsored content of some sort

      Now, I have no idea what’s going on. It’s like search engines have collectively decided “hey, remember that thing when we helped people find information they were looking for? What if we just didn’t do that anymore?

      • The Snark UrgeEnglish
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        0
        ·
        10 months ago
        link
        fedilink

        I just go to Wikipedia now, fuck them search engines.

        Actually, their current events section is a great way to get the gist of things without giving clicks to corpo fearmongers.

        • theneverfoxEnglish
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          0
          ·
          10 months ago
          link
          fedilink

          I’ll check that out, my questions are mostly very specific technical ones unfortunately. But after I forbid myself from Reddit, I do feel like I could use some new info streamsI feel healthier using Lemmy, but there is a bias a bias I tend to agree with, but you need multiple viewpoints to circle in on the actual truth

          Personally, I’ve been using language models. Not good for current streams, but for general, or even specific knowledge? Hugging faces hosts a ton of AI, if you find one trained for a specific purpose you can get pretty decent results directly.

          Your mileage may vary, obviously

    • Gabe BellOPEnglish
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      10 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      My guess is that it’s trying to be helpful – that if you (for example) type in a search for lucy and wardrobe and cordial it doesn’t limit it to all of those things, but shows you everything.

      Which is fine if you are new to the web, but if you do know what you want and are looking for the exact thing, then ten thousand results

      I can see what they were doing ignoring the operators, but yeah – it blows.

      • enkers
        arrow-up
        41
        arrow-down
        0
        ·
        10 months ago
        link
        fedilink

        That’s a very generous interpretation.

        • Viking_Hippie
          arrow-up
          14
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          10 months ago
          link
          fedilink

          EXTREMELY generous. In fact, almost SUSPICIOUSLY so 🤔