• errerEnglish
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        0
        ·
        1 year ago
        link
        fedilink

        And a Pi Hole for good measure.

        • AProfessionalEnglish
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago
          link
          fedilink

          A dns blocker cannot do anything more than ublock. It is nice for other apps though.

          • RaiEnglish
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            0
            ·
            1 year ago
            link
            fedilink

            A DNS blocker is great for other devices on your network!

        • ToNIXEnglish
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          0
          ·
          1 year ago
          link
          fedilink

          Or Adguard Home, that I think is superior than Pi-Hole. It runs as a single instance and you can easily upgrade it from the web UI.

      • j4k3English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        0
        ·
        1 year ago
        link
        fedilink

        White list firewall. Because this is the real reason everyone has a right to ad block. Ads are hidden links to other websites. It’s like walking through a gauntlet of pick pockets bribing the credit card company just to make it to the checkout at your local grocery store, or some asshole you invite into your home that goes to the bathroom, opens a window, and lets a dozen random people in your home if they pay a dollar for the access. The entire system is based on stalking people. It is criminal.

        • VeticiaEnglish
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          0
          ·
          11 months ago
          link
          fedilink

          No android version = no buy

          • XpeeNEnglish
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            0
            ·
            11 months ago
            edit-2
            11 months ago
            link
            fedilink

            Mull for android

      • EricHill78English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        0
        ·
        1 year ago
        link
        fedilink

        What does Arkenfox do? I’ll definitely add it if it’s beneficial.

        • bergaEnglish
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          0
          ·
          1 year ago
          link
          fedilink

          It changes many default Firefox preferences in about:config to be as private as possible. The main selling point is resist fingerprinting (RFP). I highly suggest reading the wiki. It can break some websites, but you can configure it to fit your needs.

    • mrsgreenpotatoEnglish
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      0
      ·
      1 year ago
      edit-2
      1 year ago
      link
      fedilink

      I am using Brave on iOS mainly because of its superb YouTube support - It has a built in ad block, can download videos offline and play minimized. Is there any way I can achieve this with any other browser? I would switch immediately.

    • nocturne213English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      0
      ·
      1 year ago
      link
      fedilink

      I bounced between the two for years, i guess i am going back to Firefox full time.

      • Bri Guy English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        0
        ·
        1 year ago
        link
        fedilink

        I used Brave for a few years but recently switched to LibreFox. I really enjoyed Brave as a browser but couldn’t handle all the sketchy shit that seems to keep coming up

        • PooptimistEnglish
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          0
          ·
          1 year ago
          link
          fedilink

          I really enjoy the chromium grouping of tabs. So much so that’s it’s almost a deciding factor for which browser I choose. I hope Firefox adds that feature soon, so the switch back feels easier

          • brrnEnglish
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            0
            ·
            1 year ago
            link
            fedilink

            Try the Simple Tab Groups addon for Firefox. I’ve been using it for years and prefer it to any other tab grouping now.

      • rndllEnglish
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        0
        ·
        1 year ago
        link
        fedilink

        The only reason I haven’t switched to Firefox from Chrome fully is because for some reason Firefox for Android still doesn’t have tabs for large screen devices. Mozilla says it’s not a priority. 🤷

        • No1English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          0
          ·
          1 year ago
          edit-2
          1 year ago
          link
          fedilink

          Firefox for Android removing the ability to open local html files killed it for me. Currently on Vivaldi.

          • QuazarOmegaEnglish
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            0
            ·
            1 year ago
            link
            fedilink

            If that’s your only gripe with it, you can still access them by using one of the simple web servers available running inside Termux, that will also allow you to avoid CORS related problems, in fact it is the currently suggested method on MDN

            • No1English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              0
              ·
              1 year ago
              edit-2
              1 year ago
              link
              fedilink

              Yeah, nah. I’ve already got enough unnecessary apps and services with Android.

              Thanks for the workaround, though.

          • 🇵🇸 Free Palestine 🇵🇸English
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            0
            ·
            1 year ago
            link
            fedilink

            Why did they remove it though? I was surprised too when I found out I needed to run local webserver to access local html files

            • No1English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              0
              ·
              1 year ago
              edit-2
              1 year ago
              link
              fedilink

              It was because of ‘security’, which was never explained. And it doesn’t make much sense when other browsers can and do alow it. I’ll see if I can dig up some historical links if I remember tomorrow.

              Last time I checked,there was still no acknowledgement of it and appeared to be no intention of ever addressing it. The fact that they’re now telling people to run a webserver suggests that nothing has changed ☹️

        • NioxicEnglish
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 year ago
          edit-2
          1 year ago
          link
          fedilink

          So use edge

          Its chrome-based but at least its not brave, and the adblocker(which is off by default) is decent enough

          • RedjardEnglish
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            0
            ·
            1 year ago
            link
            fedilink

            If you think the things brave has done are bad, go read through the list of things microsoft has done. You really don’t want them to ever have a browser again, and certainly don’t want to personally use it.

    • FatCatEnglish
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago
      link
      fedilink

      Doesn’t Firefox do telemetry and other shady shit out of the box? Ofc you can turn it off but I don’t get the fanaticism over this browser.

      • KnusperEnglish
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        0
        ·
        1 year ago
        link
        fedilink

        Every now and then, you’ll see some journalist uncovering the great revelation that Mozilla is doing unthinkable things, but I have never these stories actually being relevant, if you do more research on the topic.

        Some examples:

        And telemetry by itself is not evil either. It depends entirely on what data is actually being sent. You can look at what Mozilla sends by typing “about:telemetry” into the URL bar. In my opinion, that is perfectly fine.

        Ultimately, though, they enjoy so much trust, because they have no profit motive. The Mozilla Foundation is legally a non-profit and the Mozilla Corporation is a 100% subsidiary of the Foundation, so cannot pay out profits to anyone either.

        Any ‘evil’ shit they do to make money, they do it to pay wages and to invest further into Firefox & their other projects.

        You can criticize that the CEO takes a salary she can’t possibly spend (yet is below industry-standard, to my knowledge). And you can argue whether they should be taking so much money from Google rather than other sources.

        But all in all, that still leaves them far above companies who need to exploit users as much as justifiable, to make the maximum amount of profit.

    • ex_redditorEnglish
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago
      link
      fedilink

      With brave I never see any pc or YouTube ads. With Firefox even with ublock origin I can’t get rid of those damn ads. That’s what keeps me on brave

      • MangoPenguinEnglish
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        0
        ·
        1 month ago
        link
        fedilink

        No ads on YT with Firefox + uBlock, not sure why your setup isn’t working.

    • FatCatEnglish
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago
      link
      fedilink

      Firefox and mozilla aren’t your friend.

      They like to play the “user and privacy friendly” company. Meanwhile they are hemoraging users, and laying off staff needed to actually build a great browser.

      Mozilla ceo pay increase + layoffs in 2020:

      In 2018 she received a total of $2,458,350 in compensation from Mozilla, which represents a 400% payrise since 2008. On the same period, Firefox marketshare was down 85%. When asked about her salary she stated “I learned that my pay was about an 80% discount to market. Meaning that competitive roles elsewhere were paying about 5 times as much. That’s too big a discount to ask people and their families to commit to.

      In 2020, after returning to the position of CEO, her salary had risen to over $3 million. In the same year the Mozilla Corporation laid off approximately 250 employees due to shrinking revenues. Baker blamed this on the Coronavirus pandemic.

      • cikanoEnglish
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        0
        ·
        1 year ago
        link
        fedilink

        They don’t need to be my friend to be better than the chromium browsers though, so I don’t know what this has to do with anything

      • MangoPenguinEnglish
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        0
        ·
        1 month ago
        link
        fedilink

        What’s the alternative though, we have Chrome and Firefox as choices. Chrome is far worse than some issues with Firefox around CEO pay.

  • blue_zephyrEnglish
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    0
    ·
    1 year ago
    link
    fedilink

    The fact that their founder wants to ban gay marriage is enough reason for me to avoid it like the plague.

      • blue_zephyrEnglish
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        0
        ·
        1 year ago
        edit-2
        1 year ago
        link
        fedilink

        He made a thousand dollar donation in support of proposition 8, a constitutional amendment in California that strips gay people of the right to marry. He then proceeded to argue that such a donation does not make him a bigot or an enemy of LGBTQ+ people, because he’s a delusional piece of filth.

        This effectively prevented gay people from marrying in California from 2008 to 2013 until the fascists that supported it were finally done trying to argue how this doesn’t violate the US constitution.

        So yeah, may he, his browser, and any pathethic excuse that pretends to be human being who supported this abomination rot in the deepest depths forever.

  • RaltoidEnglish
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    0
    ·
    1 year ago
    edit-2
    1 year ago
    link
    fedilink

    The ceo is a bigoted asshole, Brave is chromium, it was initially funded by Peter Thiel and they’re literally just trying to make their own adsense network.

    The self-proclaimed privacy focused browser is tracking your browsing and want to serve you personalized ads, and I think they want to use that tracking data for AI training as well, meaning other people can potentially access it.

    And lets not forget about their crypto currency that you can earn by turning on special ads. Which they seemingly unironically called it “Basic Attent Tokens”

    TL;DR: The company is basically a sham company trying to usher in a dystopia. Where you’ll get paid for staring at ads, while having all your data stolen and sold back to you.

    • sic_1English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      0
      ·
      1 year ago
      link
      fedilink

      I see no reason to use any other browser than Firefox and maybe Librewolf.

      • mrsgreenpotatoEnglish
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        0
        ·
        1 year ago
        edit-2
        1 year ago
        link
        fedilink

        I am using Brave on iOS mainly because of its superb YouTube support - It has a built in ad block, can download videos offline and play minimized. Is there any way I can achieve this with any other browser? I would switch immediately.

      • Amilo159English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        0
        ·
        1 year ago
        link
        fedilink

        Firefox on desktop is awesome. Firefox on mobile is painful.

        • astropenguin5English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          0
          ·
          1 year ago
          edit-2
          1 year ago
          link
          fedilink

          Yeah top 4 browser are Firefox, librewolf, tor, and mullvad for sure.

          • mczEnglish
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            0
            ·
            1 year ago
            link
            fedilink

            mull and mullvad are at least two different things

            • CapnAssHoloEnglish
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              0
              ·
              1 year ago
              link
              fedilink

              Autocorrect so strong it turns your browser into a VPN

  • stooovieEnglish
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    0
    ·
    1 year ago
    edit-2
    1 year ago
    link
    fedilink

    I have absolutely no idea how Brave got the reputation it has. It’s business model is disgusting and extortionate, it’s like paying for warez. Been clear as day since day one.

  • arcEnglish
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago
    link
    fedilink

    Brave is a marching band of red flags. It claims privacy while injecting ads, affiliate codes and crypto into the browser. It’s kind of sad to see someone like Brendan Eich who should know better turn to the dark side and pretend this is all fine. It isn’t.

    Best advice I could give for anyone who wants privacy is use Firefox or a branch of it. Firefox is out of the box the most privacy conscious mainstream browser and add-ons make it more so. If you want absolute privacy you could even use a derivative like Tor Browser.

    • prosp3ktEnglish
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      These people talking as if not all the crypto bloat would be opt in lol. It just take 30 seconds or even less to turn off everything of that.

    • Indra881English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago
      link
      fedilink

      Brave is more secure than Firefox out of the box.

  • batman654987English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    0
    ·
    7 months ago
    link
    fedilink

    This is bulshit, didnt have to say aything in tehnical aspect of the browser so he continyed to tras some people that work on that project, probably false

  • dantheclammanOPEnglish
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    0
    ·
    1 year ago
    link
    fedilink

    Today I learned that people take it VERY PERSONALLY when you criticize their chosen browser. 😂

  • PantherinaEnglish
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    0
    ·
    8 months ago
    link
    fedilink

    Damn didnt know it was that bad.

    They also lack any documentation about how to use their policies on Linux (where you can disable all the bloat). But it should be doable, I will give it another try.

    Is the browser even FOSS? Can you compile a working version yourself?

    I do that with Firefox and it is really cool.

  • rogEnglish
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    0
    ·
    1 year ago
    link
    fedilink

    I dont know why anyone would leave chrome and land on something like brave.

    If youre ditching chrome, which you should, go to an actual different browser and use Firefox.

    • hayes_English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      0
      ·
      1 year ago
      link
      fedilink

      Personal anecdote:

      When I initially decided to drop Chrome, I moved to Brave because - as a chromium-based browser - it supported the same set of extensions I’d grown accustomed to.

      That being said, the crypto stuff weirded me out enough that, once I’d weaned myself off the extensions, I switched to Firefox.

      • JusticeEnglish
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        0
        ·
        1 year ago
        link
        fedilink

        What extensions does chrome have which are useful that Firefox doesn’t?

        My only recurring issue with Firefox, which may have been fixed I dunno, is it for some reason it “isn’t officially supported” or whatever exact wording to use hardware security keys (like yubikey, which I use on every account that allows it). It’s only certain websites that don’t want to work though. Like google, Microsoft and many others were fine but I think paypal didn’t want to work properly but it does work on Edge, Chrome, probably Brave. Overall annoying as fuck at times but I deal with it to be out of Google’s-world

    • CypherEnglish
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      0
      ·
      1 year ago
      link
      fedilink

      Streaming services seem to lower bitrate when I’m using Firefox vs Brave, so Brave is my go to for streaming.

      I use Firefox for everything else.

    • Avid AmoebaEnglish
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      0
      ·
      1 year ago
      edit-2
      1 year ago
      link
      fedilink

      Chromium has metric shit tons of work done that seems to perform great. What I would love to see is for Mozilla to fork Chromium, staff it with enough people to maintain it, add/remove the features they feel are appropriate/inappropriate, and thus reuse the tons of free work Google and others have already done. As a software engineer, I don’t buy the argument that it’s easier to correctly implement every new web feature anew than maintaining a fork. Every large org that ships anything based on Android for example maintains a fork of an even bigger codebase. It’s not as complicated as people make it out to be. It’s not a new problem and there are strategies to manage it. If Mozilla does this, they’ll be able to play an active role in steering by far the biggest rendering engine’s direction, instead of playing opposition with no stake in it. Now downvote away! 😄

      • tateEnglish
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago
        link
        fedilink

        The more market share chrome based browsers have, the easier it is for google to inflict their agenda for the internet on everyone. If firefox didnt exist, every web developer would be optimizing their sites only for chrome, and responding quickly to any change google wants to make.

  • AlmightySnoo 🐢🇮🇱🇺🇦English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    0
    ·
    1 year ago
    edit-2
    1 year ago
    link
    fedilink

    At one point they were scummy enough to automatically add their referral codes to any Amazon link you see. Lots of people today still mindlessly recommend Brave, and that’s what’s wrong in general with the “but the UX is so nice” mentality.

    • AbidanYreEnglish
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      0
      ·
      1 year ago
      link
      fedilink

      Lots of people today still mindlessly recommend Brave

      It starts to feel astroturfed at a certain point. The last week or so has been crazy.

    • FatCatEnglish
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      0
      ·
      1 year ago
      link
      fedilink

      Its almost like UX is one of the most important things for a user of any given program. 🥴

    • fuboEnglish
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      0
      ·
      1 year ago
      edit-2
      1 year ago
      link
      fedilink

      At one point they were scummy enough to automatically add their referral codes to any Amazon link you see.

      To be clear, that means Brave is ① invading their users’ privacy, and ② stealing money from web publishers.

      The point of referral codes is to reward web publishers for referring users to a product; leading to the user buying a product that they otherwise wouldn’t.

      Your browser isn’t introducing you to a product. For it to insert referral codes for the browser vendor’s benefit is stealing money.

    • Just_Pizza_CrustEnglish
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      0
      ·
      1 year ago
      link
      fedilink

      If you really dig into the whole ordeal it was a software error, not some malicious idea to steal links from creators.

      • _jonatan_English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        0
        ·
        1 year ago
        edit-2
        1 year ago
        link
        fedilink

        How exactly does one accidentally insert affiliate data on links? At some point someone wrote that code, which is malicious in itself, even if the activation was accidental.

      • _jonatan_English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        0
        ·
        1 year ago
        edit-2
        1 year ago
        link
        fedilink

        Why the fuck should your browser get a share from your amazon shopping? It’s doubly galling since they pretend to care about user privacy.

  • febraEnglish
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    0
    ·
    1 year ago
    link
    fedilink

    So the CEO is a raging alt-righter. Glad I never used his product then.

    • ExFedEnglish
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      0
      ·
      1 year ago
      link
      fedilink

      So, not trying to sympathize with Eich here, where do you get “alt-right” from?

      • TheGrandNagusEnglish
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        0
        ·
        1 year ago
        link
        fedilink

        Being against equal rights for gay/bi people is considered pretty right wing these days mate

        • kenbw2English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago
          edit-2
          1 year ago
          link
          fedilink

          And this is what’s wrong with politics now

          I’m all for gay rights and advocate for same sex marriage. But if he doesn’t then he’s now boxed in with the skinhead kill-all-the-immigrants crowd? Where’s the nuance?

          That said, I don’t really trust Brave the product. It’s pushing its privacy agenda a little too hard for me to trust it.

          Just use Firefox if you want privacy

          • MelllvarEnglish
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            0
            ·
            1 year ago
            link
            fedilink

            Where was the nuance in Proposition 8?

  • alvanrahimliEnglish
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    0
    ·
    1 year ago
    link
    fedilink

    Unfortunately, there are the ame stuff about Firefox too. Mozilla Foundation is such a corrupt organization with extreme shady finances.

    Foundation’s main income is royalties by google: 567M per year.

    Donations: 7M (which almost goes to the CEO’s bonuses)

    the CEO gets 700K salary and 4.6M bonuses. Lmao.

    I’d suggest, using Firefox but not donating to them.

    • prosp3ktEnglish
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      0
      ·
      9 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      I come from the future, now CEO’s salary is almost 9M.

  • dexahtmEnglish
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    0
    ·
    1 year ago
    link
    fedilink

    I thought it was nice that maybe a private browser would be mainstream but then on second thought Something icky must be going on if it’s mainstream, i mean the whole crypto part was an instant warning for me. Proud Librewolf user over here!!!

  • realcaseyrollinsEnglish
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    0
    ·
    1 month ago
    link
    fedilink

    I thought this would bring up serious issues with the browser but it’s justthe creator doesn’t support gay marriage, the browser isn’t an adblock hardliner, and it has built-in crypto support?

    lollllllll