A_Atoscience@lemmy.world·8 months ago[meta] Lack of posting rules in /c/sciencemessage-squarearrow-up123arrow-down13message-square7file-textfedilink
arrow-up120arrow-down1message-square[meta] Lack of posting rules in /c/scienceA_Atoscience@lemmy.world·8 months agomessage-square7file-textfedilink
minus-squareTH1NKTHRICEarrow-up6arrow-down0·8 months agolinkfedilinkGood idea in principle. Do peer-reviewed journals only count as credible? If not, what is your proposed criteria?
minus-squarehauiarrow-up2arrow-down0·8 months agolinkfedilinkI mean, using peer teviewed journals and „credible“ in the same sentence these days is quite gutsy, ngl. Source: https://www.theguardian.com/science/2024/feb/03/the-situation-has-become-appalling-fake-scientific-papers-push-research-credibility-to-crisis-point
minus-squareA_AOParrow-up1arrow-down0·8 months agolinkfedilinkI would accept any article which try at least to be educational and sustain science // not confuse people or sell snake oil.
Good idea in principle. Do peer-reviewed journals only count as credible? If not, what is your proposed criteria?
I mean, using peer teviewed journals and „credible“ in the same sentence these days is quite gutsy, ngl. Source: https://www.theguardian.com/science/2024/feb/03/the-situation-has-become-appalling-fake-scientific-papers-push-research-credibility-to-crisis-point
I would accept any article which try at least to be educational and sustain science // not confuse people or sell snake oil.