issue0315toTechnology@lemmy.worldEnglish·8 months agocross-posted to: hardware@lemmy.mlControversial benchmarking website goes behind paywall — Userbenchmark now requires a $10 monthly subscription(www.tomshardware.com)external-linkarrow-up1641arrow-down113message-square88fedilink
arrow-up1628arrow-down1external-linkControversial benchmarking website goes behind paywall — Userbenchmark now requires a $10 monthly subscription(www.tomshardware.com)issue0315toTechnology@lemmy.worldEnglish·8 months agocross-posted to: hardware@lemmy.mlmessage-square88fedilink
minus-squareMataVatnikEnglisharrow-up219arrow-down2·8 months agolinkfedilinkAren’t these the people that straight up manipulated data to make AMD look worse than Intel or something wild?
minus-squareHarkMahlbergarrow-up113arrow-down1·8 months agolinkfedilinkYeah that’s the guy. Hilarious to see he thinks his garbage biased opinion is worth any amount of money.
minus-squareTheGrandNagusEnglisharrow-up65arrow-down1·8 months agolinkfedilinkYup. They’ve always done it, both on the CPU and GPU side, but especially on the CPU side.
Aren’t these the people that straight up manipulated data to make AMD look worse than Intel or something wild?
Yeah that’s the guy. Hilarious to see he thinks his garbage biased opinion is worth any amount of money.
Yup. They’ve always done it, both on the CPU and GPU side, but especially on the CPU side.