German energy giant RWE has begun dismantling a wind farm to make way for a further expansion of an open-pit lignite coal mine in the western region of North Rhine Westphalia.

I thought renewables were cheaper than coal. How is this possible?

  • A2PKXGEnglish
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    0
    ·
    1 year ago
    link
    fedilink

    It’s about density. Renewables Are great, but not on terms of value add per square foot. The coal under the wind mill is worth orders of magnitude more than the windmill.

    And, it’s not as bad as it sounds. In general, the number of windmills keeps increasing.

    • UlrikHD
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      0
      ·
      1 year ago
      link
      fedilink

      If you care about energy density, nuclear is the best solution, not coal. I guess Germans don’t care though

      • A2PKXGEnglish
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        0
        ·
        1 year ago
        link
        fedilink

        I didn’t say density is the paramount parameter. Also, once you optimize one drawback, it generally gets less important.

        I just wanted to put the image into context, and show that it isn’t a big step backwards, just sideways perhaps. Or in other words, a sigle wind farm isn’t relevant, the sum is

        • PowerCrazy
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago
          link
          fedilink

          Mining more coal is extremely relevant though.