• EnderWi99in
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    0
    ·
    1 year ago
    link
    fedilink

    What is with the China apologists in this thread? Wtf??

    • pinkdrunkenelephants
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      0
      ·
      1 year ago
      link
      fedilink

      They’re paid astroturfers and they don’t belong on Lemmy. Why the server admins refuse to police them, I just don’t know.

      • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago
        link
        fedilink

        Imagine thinking there are paid astroturfers on a tiny niche platform with a few thousand users. We have some utterly insane people here after reddit migration.

        • pinkdrunkenelephants
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          0
          ·
          1 year ago
          link
          fedilink

          Imagine thinking governments, fascists and PR agencies wouldn’t migrate to wherever people choose to hang out and continue their decades-long campaign to brainwash people into believing whatever is convenient for them.

          • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago
            link
            fedilink

            I see you don’t understand the concept of niches. Governments, fascists, and PR agencies are going to spend their effort where it makes the most impact. Only a brainwashed person couldn’t comprehend that people could legitimately disagree with their world view, and anybody who thinks different from them must therefore be a paid troll.

    • psilocybin
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      0
      ·
      1 year ago
      link
      fedilink

      This, my friend, is the absense of neocon/neolib censorship and propaganda that you were so used to on corporate social media.

      Isn’t it great?

    • ☭ Blursty ☭
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      0
      ·
      1 year ago
      link
      fedilink

      What’s with all the conspiracy nutcases here? The fucking Uighur genocide smh, are the space lizards making China do this or is it Sasquatch man?

      • OurToothbrushM
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        0
        ·
        1 year ago
        edit-2
        1 year ago
        link
        fedilink

        What’s with all the conspiracy nutcases here? The fucking Uighur genocide

        is mostly sourced from a far right German nationalist who’s been proven to mistranslate Chinese documents over and over again, and claims that God gave him a mission to destroy China.

        has been debunked by many Muslim countries visiting China to investigate

        is a media narrative connected to the US funding radical Islamic groups to destabilize east turkestan and failing miserably as the Chinese response was mostly improving economic conditions and funding uyghur cultural programs which actually is effective at deradicalization, which is what the US could have done in Iraq in Afghanistan if they were over there for altruistic or mutually beneficial reasons and not just to extract oil and opium while making some defense contractors very rich.

    • fishtacos
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      0
      ·
      1 year ago
      link
      fedilink

      I found this to be a decent enough primer: https://medium.com/@bobbyarlan/a-case-study-in-racist-anti-chinese-sentiment-fuelled-by-american-bots-and-western-propaganda-f0a69978d568

      A decent TLDR: The article argues that anti-Chinese propaganda spread by the U.S. and Western media is fueling racist sentiment. Claims of mass detention of Uyghurs are based on flawed studies and sources like Adrian Zenz, a far-right Christian fundamentalist. Atrocity propaganda is a common tactic used by the U.S. to justify wars. The U.S. is threatened by China’s economic rise and technological progress, so it is trying to portray China negatively and prepare public opinion for a potential conflict. However, most of the world sees China positively and as an economic opportunity, making a new Cold War against China unlikely to succeed

      In short, a lot of information about China that has come out of Western news media has been proven to be based on known biased sources, known anit-China rhetoric, and/or outright lies. It’s difficult to prove/disprove of any information specifically, that takes time and reporting, but a lot of people see the anti-China pattern in BBC reporting, and tend to dismiss it because of known history.

      • MacroCyclo
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        0
        ·
        1 year ago
        edit-2
        1 year ago
        link
        fedilink

        I think this flies a bit too far in the other direction. China is totalitarian. It is not a democracy. It is also increasingly antagonizing nations abroad. I think it is valid to consider it a threat if you are any other nation, period.

        Edit: Kinda like Russia

        • fishtacos
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          0
          ·
          1 year ago
          link
          fedilink

          So No, it’s not like Russia at all. But that nuance is too long for me to explain right now. Short answer is that Russia is capitalist, and China is 50/50 capitalist/socialist, depending on definitions, and yeah a lot of nuance.

          But China is run by the people, their authoritarian politics keeps their billionaires and induatry in check. Their local politics is a negotiation with the national politics.

          And How exactly is China antagonizing nations abroad? Because a lot of countries are choosing to work with China because they AREN’T antagonizing them as much as America and Europe. So The reality is the opposite.

          • MacroCyclo
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            0
            ·
            1 year ago
            link
            fedilink

            I mean, if you haven’t been there or don’t know anyone from there you could pretend they are a democracy, but they are authoritarian like Russia is authoritarian. Long term they will seek a wider swath to be authoritarian over.

            • fishtacos
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              0
              ·
              1 year ago
              link
              fedilink

              And the argument from ignorance continues.

              All I have to say is read more and be online less.

              • MacroCyclo
                arrow-up
                0
                arrow-down
                0
                ·
                1 year ago
                link
                fedilink

                It’s not from ignorance. It’s based on the people I know from China.

                • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago
                  link
                  fedilink

                  Newsflash, you can find people in any country who don’t like their government, and you’ll obviously see these people over represented in the population that left the country. The fallacy of your argument is to conclude that the people you know hold the opinion of the majority of people in China. I made plenty of friends who from China in university, and most of them went back after graduating. Vast majority of people in China support their government and are proud of their country. Even western polling admits this.

  • mimEnglish
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    0
    ·
    1 year ago
    link
    fedilink

    I’m just gonna sit back and enjoy the tankies from lemmygrad denying or trying to justify this one as well. 🍿

    • ☭ Blursty ☭
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      0
      ·
      1 year ago
      link
      fedilink

      Imagine believing the BBC about China. Are you not embarrassed?

      • mim
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        0
        ·
        1 year ago
        link
        fedilink

        Imagine defending Russian and Chinese imperialism because “the enemy of my enemy is my friend”.

        • ☭ Blursty ☭
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          0
          ·
          1 year ago
          link
          fedilink

          Neither China not Russia are imperialist. China is a socialist state so by definition cannot be and Russia is an immature industrial capitalist state.

          • 133arc585
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago
            link
            fedilink

            China is a socialist state so by definition cannot be

            Can you elaborate on that? I agree that China is not imperialist, but I don’t see how socialism by definition precludes that possibility.

            • ☭ Blursty ☭
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              0
              ·
              1 year ago
              edit-2
              1 year ago
              link
              fedilink

              Imperialism is the final stage of capitalism. Finance capitalism takes over from industrial capitalism and seeks out markets abroad, having exhausted the internal ones. It teams up with other finance capitalism to become a global force, the export of capital becomes the most prominent feature of the economy rather than the export of raw materials or finished goods. The states they come from tend to become fascist in nature, or as some people put it, “fascism is imperialism turned inward”.

              Even if China was a capitalist country as some people claim, it still wouldn’t be at that stage yet. Russia might wish to one day be there, but it too has a long way to go.

              • 133arc585
                arrow-up
                0
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago
                link
                fedilink

                You didn’t answer what I asked.

                You said that capitalism by definition leads to imperialism. I asked how socialism by definition precludes imperialism.

                • OurToothbrushM
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  arrow-down
                  0
                  ·
                  1 year ago
                  link
                  fedilink

                  I would suggest reading “Imperialism, the highest stage of Capitalism”

                  Imperialism has a highly specific definition.

                • ☭ Blursty ☭
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  arrow-down
                  0
                  ·
                  1 year ago
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago
                  link
                  fedilink

                  Because you need to get to imperialism via capitalism. There is definitively no other way.

  • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago
    link
    fedilink

    PSA: these kinds of threads are a great way to create blocklists of western bootlickers and trolls.

    • mub
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      0
      ·
      1 year ago
      link
      fedilink

      Curious. Seems to work both ways.

      • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago
        link
        fedilink

        I don’t have any issue with that, the less toxic people I have to interact with on here the happier I’ll be. I encourage anybody who finds my comments and posts upsetting to block me and move on.

    • socsa
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      0
      ·
      1 year ago
      link
      fedilink

      Everyone is brainwashed except for you.

      • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago
        link
        fedilink

        Nah, just people who uncritically regurgitate propaganda, and screech about everybody who disagrees with them being a Russian puppet and a tankie whatever that means.

          • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago
            link
            fedilink

            Yeah, that’s a fair point. It’s important to keep in mind that people are accepting the propaganda because they want to believe it and they understand that it serves their selfish interests.

        • OurToothbrushM
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          0
          ·
          1 year ago
          link
          fedilink

          The most offensive part of being called a tankie is being called British.

  • Krause [he/him]
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago
    edit-2
    1 year ago
    link
    fedilink

    A UN Resolution of global south nations:https://undocs.org/pdf?symbol=en/A/HRC/41/G/17

    We express our firm opposition to relevant countries’ practice of politicizing human rights issues, by naming and shaming, and publicly exerting pressures on other countries. We commend China’s remarkable achievements in the field of human rights by adhering to the people-centered development philosophy and protecting and promoting human rights through development. We also appreciate China’s contributions to the international human rights cause.

    World Bank Investigation of Xinjiang:https://www.worldbank.org/en/news/statement/2019/11/11/world-bank-statement-on-review-of-project-in-xinjiang-china

    When allegations are made, the World Bank takes them seriously and reviews them thoroughly. In line with standard practice, immediately after receiving a series of serious allegations in August 2019 in connection with the Xinjiang Technical and Vocational Education and Training Project, the Bank launched a fact-finding review, and World Bank senior managers traveled to Xinjiang to gather information directlyThe team conducted a thorough review of project documents, engaged in discussions with project staff, and visited schools directly financed by the project, as well as their partner schools that were the subject of allegations. The review did not substantiate the allegations.

    Organization of Islamic Cooperation praises Chinese handling of Xinjiang:https://www.oic-oci.org/docdown/?docID=4447&refID=1250

    Welcomes the outcomes of the visit conducted by the General Secretariat’s delegation upon invitation from the People’s Republic of China; commends the efforts of the People’s Republic of China in providing care to its Muslim citizens; and looks forward to further cooperation between the OIC and the People’s Republic of China.

    http://www.inp.net.pk/china-lauds-oics-resolution-on-xinjiang/

    Egyptian media delegates visit Xinjiang: https://www.thenews.com.pk/latest/430738-egyptian-media-delegates-provide-a-detailed-insight-of-the-situation-in-xinjiang

    The recently published report also brings forth some interesting facts related to the religious freedom as opposed to the western propaganda. The report provides a strong testimonial by the visiting delegates who clearly state, “the in houses of worship such as the Id Kah Mosque in Kashgar, modern facilities abound, providing water, electricity and air conditioning. Local clerics told the visitors that their religious activities had been very well protected”. “The conditions here are very good, said Abdelhalim Elwerdany, of Egypt’s Al-Gomhuria newspaper. “I could feel that local Muslims fully enjoy religious freedom.

    Also Adrian Zenz is a complete moron:

    https://lemmygrad.ml/pictrs/image/5b4ef21b-619a-4e63-a74f-0f35397645b1.png