• pandapooEnglish
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago
    edit-2
    8 months ago
    link
    fedilink

    You probably shouldn’t make these ambiguous comments with your brand new alt/Smurf/shill account.

    Without a post history I can’t tell if you’re recommending McKinsey in good faith, which would be hilarious btw.

    Or if you’re trying to make a sarcastic recommendation because you think McKinsey would have some adverse affect on the efficacy, or posture, of the US DOD. Which would also be funny, as it would imply that you made that joke while being unaware that McKinsey already does quite a lot work within the US MIC.

    Anyways, while I found you use of a brand new account to leave that specific comment amusingstill, fuck McKinsey and anyone who’s ever worked for them cough Mayor Pete.

    • Disengago
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      @pandapoo It seems you are replying to the wrong message, my account is not new.

      The comment was sarcastic. McKinsey has disarmed the german Bundeswehr by siphoning off money. Maybe it is not as effective in the US.

      I agree with your general sentiment, i just think removing weapons is a priority, those kill more directly than the alternative.