• holland
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    8 months ago
    edit-2
    8 months ago
    link
    fedilink

    So you are less than 14 years old?

    2009-2011, they had all 4, POTUS, Senate (59 seats), House and SCOTUS.

    Seriously learn some damn history. And it’s extremely disingenious to claim that the Dems didn’t have all 3 from 2021-2023.

    Further the last time the GOP has had all 3 was in 2007. Yet, somehow they manage to get their agenda through.

    • Omega
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      8 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      I’m 34.

      I said liberals not Dems.

      I said liberals not Dems.

      And learn some damn history yourself. Trump replaced 2 liberal justices which only requires POTUS and Senate. And we learned under Trump that it’s much, MUCH easier to hurt people than to help people. Thanks everyone who refused to vote for Hillary. You did this.

      You want change? Vote more liberals in. Don’t want change? Keep bitching.

      • holland
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        8 months ago
        link
        fedilink

        Yet again, with the disingenious bullshit.

        Liberals = Dems

        And learn some damn history yourself. Trump replaced 2 liberal justices which only requires POTUS and Senate. And we learned under Trump that it’s much, MUCH easier to hurt people than to help people. Thanks everyone who refused to vote for Hillary. You did this.

        You just proved my point, dude. Look you don’t need all three branches to actual produce results for your base. The Dems don’t produce the results we want because they do not want to not because they’re powerless.

        • Pipoca
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          8 months ago
          link
          fedilink

          I assume his point is that calling Manchin or Sinema “liberal” isn’t super accurate.

        • Omega
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          8 months ago
          link
          fedilink

          Liberals = Dems

          If you think that, you probably shouldn’t talk politics. And it’s probably not worth the time to talk politics with you.

          • ComradeChairmanKGB
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            8 months ago
            link
            fedilink

            I’ve got bad news for you. The democrats are indeed liberals, and so are the Republicans. Perhaps it’s you who doesn’t understand politics?

          • holland
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            8 months ago
            link
            fedilink

            You should probably learn political terms before telling people not to talk politics. Liberalism as defined by Oxford.

            • Omega
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              8 months ago
              edit-2
              8 months ago
              link
              fedilink

              Oh neat. Here’s the definition of political by Oxford.