• theblueredditrefugeeEnglish
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago
    link
    fedilink

    Western Europe, 1950s era. Capitalism had to make compromises. The soviet union was right next door - if people realized that seizing the means of production would improve their quality of life, they’d have a communist revolution on their hands. So concessions were made. “See, you don’t need communism to have a good life, we’re giving you all those things too!

    And finally, the capitalists won and the soviet union was no more, parceled up and sold to the capital owners in the west. Now they don’t feel the need to make concessions without a major communist power in their backyard. So they roll back the progress slowly, hoping no one notices.

    • fossilesqueEnglish
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      10 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      Yes, but what about insert whatever culture war topic of the hour?

      • theblueredditrefugeeEnglish
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        0
        ·
        10 months ago
        link
        fedilink

        Personally I take <side> on <topic> because <reasons typical for my side> and I take offense that you would suggest that it’s entirely a manufactured issue created by the capital class to keep us fighting each other instead of them. Even suggesting it just serves the purpose of <other side>!

        (not to imply that culture war bullshit doesn’t have real world consequences, that’s why the capital class picks these topics as wedge issues)