AI-created “virtual influencers” are stealing business from humans::Brands are turning to hyper-realistic, AI-generated influencers for promotions.

  • the_qEnglish
    arrow-up
    234
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    10 months ago
    link
    fedilink

    Oh no. People who use their good looks to push lifestyles that are unattainable are suffering the smallest bit of inconvenience. Oh no.

    • bionicjoeyEnglish
      arrow-up
      99
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      10 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      Couldn’t have happened to a more deserving bunch honestly

      • umbrellaEnglish
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        10 months ago
        link
        fedilink

        my problem with it is that we may be next

        • afraid_of_zombiesEnglish
          arrow-up
          19
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          10 months ago
          link
          fedilink

          And? Go ahead and automate my job. I will find something else to do with my life. Good luck btw my work is a bit more complicated than pretending to be famous and harassing restaurants for free food until I am 30 fat or both.

          • umbrellaEnglish
            arrow-up
            12
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            10 months ago
            edit-2
            10 months ago
            link
            fedilink

            they are experimentally automating lawyers and doctors already, complexity is not the determining factor here.

            what is that something else in life you are going to do when they start pitching us to compete against machines? i can bet my ass on the fact they will use it to devalue human labour as much as possible, and most people cant afford to survive as is.

            • aicseEnglish
              arrow-up
              8
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              10 months ago
              link
              fedilink

              Who are those “they” always refered? Isn’t it that the humanity is doing all for this?

              • TwilightVulpineEnglish
                arrow-up
                7
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                10 months ago
                link
                fedilink

                The “they” are the wealthy executives and investors doing whatever they can to optimize every single penny into their pockets

                In a way it is “the humanity doing it to themselves”, but they sure aren’t asking the average worker how they feel about it, or letting them have any easier time because of it. If enough work is automated, they’d rather fire people and have one person work for two while the second person starves.

              • umbrellaEnglish
                arrow-up
                5
                arrow-down
                0
                ·
                10 months ago
                link
                fedilink

                in this specific case “they” are tech corporations, tech ceos and their respective shareholders which might include a part of the global burgeoise.

                i think this tech would be used much differently if the rest of the knowledgeable people in humanity had a say/vote on it, besides financial interest.

            • afraid_of_zombiesEnglish
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              10 months ago
              link
              fedilink

              Cool. So it’s been 8 hours. How far have “they” progressed? Do I still have to go to work on Tuesday?

              Sorry the influencer you follow can’t get free stuff anymore.

              • umbrellaEnglish
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                10 months ago
                edit-2
                10 months ago
                link
                fedilink

                You are naive to think stuff like this will change overnight. And you might be if you think you are getting singled out and spared.

                I don’t follow influencers nor do I have any traditional social media.

          • rottingleafEnglish
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            10 months ago
            link
            fedilink

            It’s a well-known fact that most people think that all jobs can be automated except their own. Well, I’m distorting it a bit to extremes.

            As for me, I know my job can be automated. Actually, I’m automating it a bit to make fewer mistakes and give fewer fucks. And I know that eventually there may not be a need for me if I don’t change levels.

            Fields and professions are persistent, particular roles humans perform in them are not.

              • rottingleafEnglish
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                10 months ago
                link
                fedilink

                Mixed up comments probably.

                Anyway, to you my question is - why do you think such a migration would work? You are older than when you entered your current profession. And it’s a competitive system, another people would have more experience than you.

                • afraid_of_zombiesEnglish
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  10 months ago
                  link
                  fedilink

                  That isn’t your concern really, it is mine. Now how is it going with it? Am I going to work on Tuesday?

    • PaddzrEnglish
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      10 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      Or they’re just not good enough and there are prettier ones out there? God forbis Rachel’s only fans isn’t top because maybe she’s not that good at showing her pussy? Like anything in life, competition is a bitch.

    • rottingleafEnglish
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      10 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      Liking somebody for looks and such behavior only is not worse or better than disliking somebody for looks and such behavior only.

        • rottingleafEnglish
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          10 months ago
          link
          fedilink

          If that meant that you don’t get my comment, then:

          Gloating is bad.

          It’s not a bad thing that someone could live fancy without killing people or stealing or embezzling funds in some administrative position, or something of the listed indirectly.

          Various shitcoin schemes go here too.

          • the_qEnglish
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            0
            ·
            10 months ago
            link
            fedilink

            Removed by mod

            • rottingleafEnglish
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              0
              ·
              10 months ago
              link
              fedilink

              What could you possibly say that got removed by mods?

  • recapitatedEnglish
    arrow-up
    112
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago
    link
    fedilink

    That makes sense. The goal always seemed to be as fake as possible.

        • SnipingNinjaEnglish
          arrow-up
          14
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          10 months ago
          link
          fedilink

          Coz influencers can be people lucking into it, with AI influencers it’s mostly going to be brands cutting out the middlemen and making more money and reducing any chance of people receiving consequences of their actions as they can just delete that AI influencer and create a new one, whereas any human influencer will suffer the consequences even if very little for their actions

          • Flying SquidEnglish
            arrow-up
            16
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            10 months ago
            link
            fedilink

            What makes you think they can’t (and don’t) just fire a human influencer and hire a new one whenever they feel like it now?

            • SnipingNinjaEnglish
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              10 months ago
              link
              fedilink

              I did expect that, still better than AI influencers no? Even if by a tiny bit.

                • SnipingNinjaEnglish
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  10 months ago
                  link
                  fedilink

                  I’ll remember to take your words into consideration SatansMaggotyCumFart

          • RiskableEnglish
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            10 months ago
            link
            fedilink

            Whoah there: Who says AI influencers aren’t the result of individual’s honest work? You don’t need an entire data center of computers to make your own AI influencer!

            Don’t assume there’s a corporation behind every AI persona. It could just be one guy with a lot of VRAM getting creative with prompts in his parent’s basement.

            • TelodzrumEnglish
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              8
              ·
              10 months ago
              link
              fedilink

              Well they are products of the tech industry, so they are inherently not honest or ethical.

              • ClamDrinkerEnglish
                arrow-up
                8
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                10 months ago
                link
                fedilink

                Ah yes. Like that damn internet and those cursed devices people use to access it. Anyone using those is inherently not honest or ethical.

                • TelodzrumEnglish
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  8
                  ·
                  10 months ago
                  link
                  fedilink

                  The internet is the worst mistake in human history. I’m surprised you’d use that as your example.

          • SmoogsEnglish
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            0
            ·
            10 months ago
            link
            fedilink

            Right cuz blaming lobbyists and ad campaigns that’s totally worked out for tobacco, guns, pharma and vehicle companies looking to shirk any accountability.

      • systemglitchEnglish
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        0
        ·
        10 months ago
        link
        fedilink

        I think that’s a true unpopular opinion there. Not bad, not bad at all.

      • redditReallySucksEnglish
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        0
        ·
        10 months ago
        link
        fedilink

        How about none at all? But you’re probably right that real ones are better than ai. Although ai might be more ethical than some

    • the_ocsEnglish
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      10 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      First they came for the influencers, and I did not speak out, because I’m not an influencer

      • BrianTheeBiscuiteerEnglish
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        0
        ·
        10 months ago
        link
        fedilink

        Give them some talent and they’re essentially movie actors. It’s just another form of entertainment and as little as I care about influencers this won’t stop with them. Anyone that appears on camera is fair game to be replaced.

      • BluesFEnglish
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        10 months ago
        link
        fedilink

        There are some things I won’t be disappointed to see replaced by automation. Transitions are not well managed in this regard (retraining is expensive after all), but many jobs I feel should be automated because they suck. Not really sure where influencers fall on this scale Can’t imagine it’s great for your mental health.

  • A_Random_IdiotEnglish
    arrow-up
    102
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    10 months ago
    edit-2
    10 months ago
    link
    fedilink

    Oh no, fake people are stealing fake jobs from fake people!

    Anyways

  • phoneymouseEnglish
    arrow-up
    87
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    10 months ago
    edit-2
    10 months ago
    link
    fedilink

    I prefer to think of it as leveling the playing field. You don’t have to be a 20 year old woman with the right face and body ratios to be an instagram model anymore. Anyone can! Seems like true equality to me.

    • topinambour_rexEnglish
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      You just need to be a geek who can afford some 4090 and the software which produce the pretty lady.

      • jcgEnglish
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago
        link
        fedilink

        You also need an eye for the right aesthetics and some marketing savvy, there’s lots of pretty girls who still don’t meet the cut for “influencer”. Granted, being pretty and having marketing savvy is a really good recipe for success, but it still makes no guarantees.

    • NuddingEnglish
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      Yeah let’s do this instead of banning predatory advertising lol.

  • vexikronEnglish
    arrow-up
    72
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    10 months ago
    edit-2
    10 months ago
    link
    fedilink

    And thus social media has reached its apex.

    After a decade plus of bombarding people with a mix of whatever they desire most and whatever causes them to become emotionally invested to the point of exhaustion, we see the pinnacle innovation of social media:

    A literally completely fake person selling overpriced fashion I guarantee was made in a sweatshop, that nearly no one viewing ‘her’ can afford or look good in, who receives many thirsty comments praising her as if ‘she’ will be their friend or something, who in the process of doing all this also puts out of business actual human models who are simply fake in every sense of the word that is not literal.

    It is basically the most perfectly capitalist thing I can imagine. Everyone loses except the capital owners.

    I mean sure, maybe it will get some people whose entire personality is “I am pretty, worship me! to think about doing something actually useful or learning and developing a real personality.

    But we are fairly far into the predicted cyberpunk dystopia now. No its not exactly as predicted, but shockingly close in many ways.

    The average consumer of content cannot tell a bot or a fake person such as Aitana here from a real one, and there will just be another after news of Aitana in particular gets around.

    At this point I would say that most humans have basically failed a reverse Turing Test.

    • SkyeStarfallEnglish
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      0
      ·
      10 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      Yeah, we really are steamrolling right into a cyberpunk dystopia, aren’t we? Well, if we can even include the world “punk” there. It might as well just be cyber-capitalism in the end.

    • rottingleafEnglish
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      0
      ·
      10 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      I disagree with the word “capitalist”, but in emotion and general sense you nailed it.

      Just a bit sad we’re as a planet navigating Lem’s “The Megabit Bomb” and of course “Summa Technologiae” so slowly.

      I mean sure, maybe it will get some people whose entire personality is “I am pretty, worship me! to think about doing something actually useful or learning and developing a real personality.

      You’d be surprised.

  • CheeseNoodleEnglish
    arrow-up
    58
    arrow-down
    0
    ·
    10 months ago
    link
    fedilink

    Wasn’t there a social media website that did a massive bot purge a while ago and most influencers found out that like 90+% of their audiences were actually bots anyway? sounds like this is just a logical conclusion and the rest of us can get on with our lives while bots entertain bots.

    • SmoogsEnglish
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      0
      ·
      10 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      Whew. Skynet distracted itself from killing all humans.

  • xkforceEnglish
    arrow-up
    55
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    10 months ago
    link
    fedilink

    Guess they’ll have to get a real job now.

      • clearleafEnglish
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        0
        ·
        10 months ago
        link
        fedilink

        Are there any that are real in the sense that they contribute something of value to society?

        • TwilightVulpineEnglish
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          0
          ·
          10 months ago
          link
          fedilink

          Even doctors are liable to be replaced by AI. I don’t know what counts as “something of value to society” to you, and frankly that’s the sort of argument that is never worth having. But generally speaking, it doesn’t get much more valuable for society than doctors.

          • meat_popsicleEnglish
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            0
            ·
            10 months ago
            link
            fedilink

            If an AI can outperform a human doctor, isn’t that a good thing? We should always strive to improve survival for patients - it’s not about doctors jobs but patient survival and long term health outcomes.

            I would love for doctors to become AI if the AI improves our growing health inequities and inequalities.

            • TwilightVulpineEnglish
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              0
              ·
              10 months ago
              link
              fedilink

              Part of the issue is that this rush to transition to AI is not done to increase quality of work, but to sav time and costs. If the point was to improve the treatment, keeping a human doctor plus AI might result in better outcomes. But AI or no AI, a for-profit medical system won’t elliminate health inequalities.

              It’s also worth keeping in mind not all forms of work are actually enhanced by AI participation. Journalists aren’t aided by language models that regularly hallucinate false informations.

          • clearleafEnglish
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            10 months ago
            edit-2
            10 months ago
            link
            fedilink

            Being a doctor would be a real job, but the only jobs I’ve seen actually getting replaced are things like clickbait content farms, scams, marketing, exploitive gambling-centric video games, and other such garbage. Unlike being a doctor it’s never been hard to shit that stuff out into the world. And since these neural networks aren’t actually that good, I’ll believe they can replace doctors when I see it.

            • TwilightVulpineEnglish
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              0
              ·
              10 months ago
              link
              fedilink

              You haven’t heard of good writing and good artwork being replaced by AI?

              • clearleafEnglish
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                0
                ·
                10 months ago
                link
                fedilink

                I’ve seen some pretty interesting images and some funny text but nothing that amounts to a big enough vision that it’s something cohesive like a complete movie or a book. I’ve seen Joel Haver videos but those aren’t made by pushing a button and getting a video.

              • SpookyUnderwearEnglish
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                10 months ago
                link
                fedilink

                Replaced implies humans are no longer writing or creating art, which obviously isn’t the case. They just have more competition now.

                • TwilightVulpineEnglish
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  0
                  ·
                  10 months ago
                  link
                  fedilink

                  Replaced implies some, likely many humans won’t be able to compete and will be driven out of the field. Not by any other more skillful artist, but simply by AI output. Which is an inevitability. Some might say it’s already happening.

            • BrianTheeBiscuiteerEnglish
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              0
              ·
              10 months ago
              link
              fedilink

              I’ll believe they can replace doctors when I see it.

              And when that day comes we’re not going back.

  • that guyEnglish
    arrow-up
    52
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    10 months ago
    link
    fedilink

    I hate influencers, aka living adverts

  • HandlesEnglish
    arrow-up
    52
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    10 months ago
    link
    fedilink

    Let’s define “stealing” and “business” here.

    1. Influencers don’t produce anything, nor do they add intrinsic value to products they promote. Not much business to that if you ask me.

    2. They do already compete fiercely for brands’ atention so every successful influencer by definition has “stolen” potential income from others.

    If you want to split hairs, influencers’ work is creating an idealised image that they project to peddle products. If AI can outmatch them in that regard, I see no problem with that.

    • cjsolxEnglish
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      The only problem I have with that is the notion that a company gets to consolidate funds that were previously going to an actual real person. Now, if we could rely on big business to pass on those savings to their customers and employees, that would be one thing. But we can’t.

      • HandlesEnglish
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        0
        ·
        10 months ago
        link
        fedilink

        At least move those microwave ovens, refrigerators and colour tee-vees to earn your wage.

      • FlaminGokuEnglish
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        0
        ·
        10 months ago
        edit-2
        10 months ago
        link
        fedilink

        Got some installed LLM models, custom skins, simulated memories

        We’ve got your convo generated

        (We’ve got artificial personalities)

  • brsrklfEnglish
    arrow-up
    47
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    10 months ago
    link
    fedilink

    Ok, I’m all for worrying about the impact of AI in jobs but Living advertisements are easy to replace, what a suprise.

    People who make actual interesting and/or funny videos, those that require personal work and are a direct result of the creator’s skills or interests, are not really at risk of this.

    Wow, a bunch of assholes just getting paid for showing you free stuff they got, pretending to be relatable and your friend while evading their taxes in Dubai, may be out of business. And think of those parents who won’t be able to exploit their kids by getting them free toys and exposing them to the whole world!

    I don’t think I will lose any sleep over this.

    • quoEnglish
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      10 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      deleted by creator

      • brsrklfEnglish
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        0
        ·
        10 months ago
        link
        fedilink

        They’ve chosen series with huge amounts of existing content to imitate and got bad stuff from it. I am not too worried for people making more personal content.

        Yeah, maybe some time in the future you’ll get infinite serial AI content with basic entertainment value. I’d say half of Disney productions already got there without needing AI, just shotgun writing. And lots of people are already bored of it all and now only look for the good stuff.

        • RiskableEnglish
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          10 months ago
          edit-2
          10 months ago
          link
          fedilink

          It’ll be a good while before an AI generates an Oscar-winning script or a whole movie but most movies and TV shows are very formulaic. Would it really be that surprising if AIs were generating the entertainment equivalent of Hannah Montana in a few years? Or the latest Hallmark Christmas special (LOL)?

          My guess is five years: That’s how long it’ll be before we start getting a flood of half-decent AI-generated shows/movies. Where the script is good but the animation/video are “a little off”.

          I mean, come on: There’s so many successful TV shows and movies that are total shit! You think AI can’t do better with just the tiniest bit of evolutionary improvements (and better hardware)?

          Edit: I expect AI videos to be a revolution! Where we finally break free from the Hollywood and “big mega” cookie cutter stories. It’ll give creative people the power to make the movies they want without heavy-handed censorship and executives that require everything dumbed down for the lowest common viewer.

      • Tangent5280English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        0
        ·
        10 months ago
        link
        fedilink

        Are there actual original ideas coming out of these networks?

        • MeowoemEnglish
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          10 months ago
          link
          fedilink

          I mean yeah, far more than are coming out of Marvel, Disney and Hollywood in general.

          • unautrenomEnglish
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            0
            ·
            10 months ago
            edit-2
            10 months ago
            link
            fedilink

            (tbf that’s not a really high bar. These companies ask writers to NOT take any risk with their writing so to not “rock the boat” so to speak)

  • LucidlethargyEnglish
    arrow-up
    50
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    10 months ago
    link
    fedilink

    If your job is easy, then it’ll probably get replaced with AI eventually. What’s easier than being an influencer?

    • tinkeringidiotEnglish
      arrow-up
      26
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      If you only do the easy part, then yes that’s infinitely replaceable. Being a pretty face is exactly that, and AI can do that all day long.

      Being actually entertaining and engaging, though, is a different story, and AI is struggling to pick that up. And of course teams of corporate marketers continually fail at this.

      But yes, the “job” of “being attractive on the internet” can now be outsourced to machines.

      • BigPotatoEnglish
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        0
        ·
        10 months ago
        link
        fedilink

        Right, but for corporations once you mention the lack of risk that your AI influencer will rape some kids or turn out to be something equally horrible the equation becomes infinitely skewed in the AI’s favor.

        So, what I’m saying is, rule34 people gotta get to work making all those AI do horrible things and we’ll be back to expecting our brand shills to have a heartbeat.

        • tinkeringidiotEnglish
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          0
          ·
          10 months ago
          link
          fedilink

          Clearly you haven’t spent 3 minutes playing with StableDiffusion. AI has already plumbed the depths of human awfulness.

    • BrianTheeBiscuiteerEnglish
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago
      edit-2
      10 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      AI is improving by leaps and bounds. I’ve fiddled with Stable Diffusion for over a year and I’ve seen it go from mostly random, highly deformed, blurry Polaroid quality images to high def, lifelike, in almost any pose imaginable images. And the same improvement goes for non-photo quality images too. Highly-skilled illustrators with degrees are mostly fucked. This whole “but I’m so much more efficient” argument doesn’t hold water in our economy. Producing 3X more doesn’t mean people consume 3X more, it means you’re 3X overstaffed.

      Now for streamers and influencers I’ll admit some of them have cardboard personalities and are easily replaced. Someone like JSE (I don’t watch much so sorry if my references are dated) is a little more animated than average so that’s gonna be harder to replicate, but does it need to be replicated in order to steal views? Jack is one man and he can’t stream 24x7 and many would prefer an “always on” streamer to someone with better content but available intermittently.

      Hell, look at Amazon. It used to be filled with name brand products that you could rely upon because reputations were at stake. Now it’s an endless sea of cloned and relabeled products that are between decent and total crap, but is that hurting Amazon’s bottom line? Nope. The stuff is crap but it’s cheap, readily available, and it arrives in 24 hours. Who needs quality???

      TL;DR - AI doesn’t need to be good, it needs to be good enough, and when it breaches that threshold you’ll see quality content creators go into overdrive to keep up or pack it in because the effort is no longer worth the payout.

      • dumpsterlidEnglish
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        0
        ·
        10 months ago
        link
        fedilink

        I mean yeah it is heartbreaking how artists are going to be FURTHER devalued in society 🙃

    • UnderpantsWeevilEnglish
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      10 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      So much of the job is face tuned and post-productioned anyway. And what are you even doing? Unboxing videos? Soy face in front of a sports car or a machine gun?

      The real job of the modern influencer isn’t sitting in front of a camera. It’s all the SEO and brown nosing and cross-posting to raise your brand profile.

      In a media economy where everything is online is it any wonder that an AI video in a feedback loop with a bunch of AI controlled bot “users” is going to max out on a platform that only knows how to reward these artificially manipulated metrics?

  • MandyEnglish
    arrow-up
    47
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    10 months ago
    link
    fedilink

    Damn, what a shame, those poor poor influencers

    maybe they need to get an actual job now?

    • rottingleafEnglish
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      12
      ·
      10 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      Well, yes. Looking at human beauty without deep communication and intelligence is similar to playing video games when you want a Matrix-like simulation of our world. You just feel that it’s all textures put onto polygons drawn on your screen and there’s no magic behind it.

      • afraid_of_zombiesEnglish
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        10 months ago
        link
        fedilink

        Human beauty is harassing restaurant owners for free food in exchange for exposure

        • rottingleafEnglish
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          10 months ago
          link
          fedilink

          Downvote for - ah, I’ve already answered your newer comment.

        • rottingleafEnglish
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          10 months ago
          link
          fedilink

          Downvote for completely missing the point of my comment because of positive connotations with the word “beauty”.

            • rottingleafEnglish
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              10 months ago
              link
              fedilink

              Downvote for keeping spewing something incomprehensible in response to a comment elaborating another comment.

              Even if we accept that one can argue like most people in the Web, with two teams and fighting in the right direction, and not be considered an ape, - then you still got even that direction wrong.

              As for your question (I suppose it was rhetorical and intended to look edgy), I don’t know any “influencers”. But of good-looking girls I know those I could really like could as well wear Mandalorian armor at all times.

              • afraid_of_zombiesEnglish
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                0
                ·
                10 months ago
                link
                fedilink

                Did you ever show up to a gym in body paint and make a big show about being kicked out?

                • rottingleafEnglish
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  10 months ago
                  link
                  fedilink

                  No, but it would be interesting to see something like this happen.

  • gravitas_deficiencyEnglish
    arrow-up
    43
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    10 months ago
    link
    fedilink

    Forgive me for being entirely unsympathetic, but I would not call being an “influencer” a “job”.

    • Pyr_PressureEnglish
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      Even as a job it’s highly overpaid. Hardly any “work” or “skill” involved yet makes millions in some cases.

      • NBJackEnglish
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        0
        ·
        10 months ago
        link
        fedilink

        Rarely, TBH. Unless you’re OK with being an absolute ass in some form or another.

        • RagingRobotEnglish
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          0
          ·
          10 months ago
          link
          fedilink

          Yeah just enough people get rich to make you think you have a chance at the same thing. so you start making more content for the site but when you make it it’s for free lol.

    • iamtherealwalrusEnglish
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      0
      ·
      10 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      The same could be said about a lot of sources of income. It’s subjective what is considered a job.

    • iAvicennaEnglish
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      0
      ·
      10 months ago
      edit-2
      10 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      It is a job, just a ridiculously stupid one

    • BargsimBoyzEnglish
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      10 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      Are you a boomer?

      Just because you don’t like or understand something doesn’t mean it’s not a job. I think it’s a bit ridiculous myself but at end of day it’s no different to being a celebrity for whatever reason and it’s still a job.

      • vibinyaEnglish
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        0
        ·
        10 months ago
        link
        fedilink

        It’s odd where people draw the line. It’s pretty much the same as previous generations fawning over radio personalities and all the Oprah’s and such. To me, modern influences are equivalent to radio/TV hosts - personalities which are paid to promote and market products and lifestyles. Just because there’s now more and more specific niches for them, doesn’t make them any less valuable in the people’s lives who enjoy them and their content.

      • gravitas_deficiencyEnglish
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        10 months ago
        link
        fedilink

        Nope: mid 30s, politically progressive, software engineer.

        I don’t like people who make a living off of simply “being famous” either - e.g. the kardashians.

        I understand exactly what an influencer is and does. I just don’t like what they do, because the vast majority of what successful influencers do is to aggressively perpetuate some of the worst aspects of social media, as well as rampant consumerism and unbounded capitalism in general.