These countries tried everything from cash to patriotic calls to duty to reverse drastically declining birth rates. It didn’t work.

If history is any guide, none of this will work: No matter what governments do to convince them to procreate, people around the world are having fewer and fewer kids.

In the US, the birth rate has been falling since the Great Recession, dropping almost 23 percent between 2007 and 2022. Today, the average American woman has about 1.6 children, down from three in 1950, and significantly below the “replacement rate” of 2.1 children needed to sustain a stable population. In Italy, 12 people now die for every seven babies born. In South Korea, the birth rate is down to 0.81 children per woman. In China, after decades of a strictly enforced one-child policy, the population is shrinking for the first time since the 1960s. In Taiwan, the birth rate stands at 0.87.

  • BigTrout75English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    0
    ·
    11 months ago
    link
    fedilink

    Most birds don’t lay eggs without a proper nest

  • DraedronEnglish
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    0
    ·
    11 months ago
    link
    fedilink

    For no amount of money would O give up all my free time and sleep

  • eran_morad
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    0
    ·
    11 months ago
    link
    fedilink

    My wife and I are well to do in the US, with a good household income that probably puts us in the top 2% or some shit. And to maintain the sort of life that used to be considered “middle class”, we need all of that income for our family of 4. Which means that we both work. We would have liked more kids. But there is only so much time to go around. Fuck are we supposed to do, have another kid and hire a nanny? Fuck is the point of that, we wouldn’t even be parenting.

    You want more kids? Give people more time. Which means LESS WORK and BETTER CHILDCARE OPTIONS.

    • WeeSheep
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      0
      ·
      11 months ago
      edit-2
      11 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      Not to mention better healthcare! Healthcare costs are the primary reason US citizens go bankrupt. Kids get sick, adults get sick, and if one of the adults in the house gets sick and can’t help bring in money for the kids then the entire household essentially goes from upper/middle to lower or bankrupt. If a kid gets very sick, oftentimes one of the parents has to stop working to argue every single claim that insurance would be paying but doesn’t, and call every department of every doctors office or hospital to get an itemized bill and get it lowered to a reasonable cost rather than them asking for a blank check. I’m afraid of having a sick kid and losing my job to their healthcare organization (note: not their healthcare directly, but calling insurance asking them to pay for life saving care, then calling hospitals asking why a small bandage is $1200), losing my house to bankruptcy after healthcare costs, and losing any semblance of future career due to time off and losing myself.

      • eran_morad
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        0
        ·
        11 months ago
        link
        fedilink

        Word. What we really need is a societal overhaul. Not gonna happen, tho.

  • DepthCharge
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    0
    ·
    11 months ago
    link
    fedilink

    Have they tried raising the salaries so that one parent can stay at home and actually take care of the children, instead of sending them to way too expensive daycares. Having children is a “luxury” nowadays.

  • pugsnroses77
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    0
    ·
    8 months ago
    link
    fedilink

    if the main argument to have a kid is so they can enter the workforce why the hell would i want to have one?

  • Snapz
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    0
    ·
    11 months ago
    link
    fedilink

    They tried EVERYTHING, except

  • phoneymouse
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    0
    ·
    11 months ago
    link
    fedilink

    Pay me. If you want me to raise your future workers. Pay me enough to live and raise them. It used to be possible to support a family of 7 on one income with a house and two cars in the driveway. People can barely keep their heads above water nowadays on two incomes. Since it requires two incomes, there is no time for child raising. The government doesn’t provide guarantees of time off to have them, doesn’t provide daycare so you can keep your job, and doesn’t provide healthcare. No, instead we write blank checks to the Pentagon and give the rich tax cuts.

  • zepheriths
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    0
    ·
    11 months ago
    link
    fedilink

    I assure you you can. The payment would have to cover all of the child’s needs plus a bit more but you definitely can.

    • PizzaMan
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      0
      ·
      11 months ago
      edit-2
      11 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      But the cost of that would far exceed anything remotely reasonable. I say fuck it, let the birthrate drop for a few decades. The planet could use the break.

      • zepheriths
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        0
        ·
        11 months ago
        link
        fedilink

        It’s only catastrophically low in traditionally “western” countries. the world’s population is still growing. It appears immigration is now a requirement to grow the economy. How interesting.

  • teft
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    0
    ·
    11 months ago
    link
    fedilink

    People don’t want to bring children into this capitalistic hellscape. Color me surprised.

    • Immersive_Matthew
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      It is more about too much centralization of power than any one economic system as this issue is a near global issue.

  • Skybreaker
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    0
    ·
    11 months ago
    link
    fedilink

    Reducing the world population is the obvious answer to slowing the detrimental effects humankind are having on the earth.

    • SzymonEnglish
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      0
      ·
      11 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      But think of the capitalists! How will the stock market continue to make gains if there are less people?

      • Pohl
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        0
        ·
        11 months ago
        link
        fedilink

        It’s worth noting that communists and socialists also depend on population growth to sustain their civilizations as do trees and rabbits and beetles. It’s possible that economic systems don’t really matter all that much here.

        Population collapse isn’t the road to some sustainable future. It is how species go extinct. Perhaps we are on that road, so it goes. But whistling past the graveyard pretending that “Star Trek” is on the other side is silly.

        • NeuronautML
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 months ago
          edit-2
          11 months ago
          link
          fedilink

          We’re billions of people on the planet. Most jobs don’t even pay enough to feed a couple of people. I believe that there is an oversaturation of people on the planet and this has caused a devaluation of their labor.

          Europe would have remained feudal for quite a longer time if the population collapse caused by the black plague hadn’t happened and caused the demographic changes that it did. Without the plague, peasant labor would be plentiful and the status quo would not have changed. However, with the population reduction, the class in power had to concede to enough changes that brought about the Reinassance and the Industrial era quickly after.

          In the Bronze age, without the climate changes that brought about cold and dry conditions and triggered the fall of the city states ruled by an oppressive theocratic class, humans would have still been tied to those stifling conditions for longer and wouldn’t have brought about the classical era.

          With the onset of AI and advanced robotics, population collapse will allow people to see their labor valued adequately, instead of just more and more people in the workforce working more hours and getting paid less and less, doing meaningless busy work jobs to pay for things that they don’t need or enjoy, like crypto, gambling or online cam girls. A controlled collapse by fertility is not only non threatening, it is also desirable and the most acceptable way to cull numbers a bit. We need this, otherwise, the base of the pyramid will only get wider while the top will only get slimmer. Tragedy breeds suffering, but also change and we NEED change. The problem is the transition, but after the transition, we’ll be in a better place as a society and we will bring about change.

  • BigMacHole
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago
    link
    fedilink

    Ensuring families have access to Child Healthcare, parents have time to parent their kids, kids have capable and loving parents and communities have programs to ensure the wellbeing of the children is SOCIALISM!

    -Pro Life Republicans trying to Save The Children

  • ExLisperEnglish
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago
    link
    fedilink

    The real reason why people don’t have kids is because they suck. Kids are stupid and annoying. More and more people are waking up to this fact and starting to resist the social pressure.“I can actually live my life instead of dedicating all my time and resources to something I don’t even need? I’ll have two of that please!

    If government wants kids let them raise the kids. Pay women to give birth and then put the kid in public system. Problem solved.

    • Mango
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      0
      ·
      11 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      People with your argument are stupid and annoying. Kids are great. They deserve better than our society.

    • Femcowboy
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      0
      ·
      11 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      I mean, kids only really suck in a world where both parents have to work 40+ hours a week. You really don’t have to dedicate all your time to them, but in a world with less and less community to help raise them and more and more work to grind your energy down, you have to dedicate far too much of your limited free time to them. I would love to be able to raise a kid or two myself. I loved working with kids. We should not be throwing them into some nebulous “public system.

    • RBWells
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      0
      ·
      11 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      You were a kid, though. Adults aren’t just spawned, they grow from kids. Everyone seems to be talking about them (and old people, for that matter) as though they are a separate species of being. Kids are just immature people. Of course they suck. You did too, so did I.

      But they are also awesome, and grow up to be adults. I had fun having kids. Taking them places, watching them grow and change, the funny things they say and the flashes of insight. Now most of them are adult people. I don’t care if they have kids, they should do whatever they want. But I did enjoy the parenting. Sure, it’s not convenient, it’s life.

  • queermunist she/her
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    11 months ago
    edit-2
    11 months ago
    link
    fedilink

    Just like the socalled “work shortage”, the problem is they aren’t offering nearly enough. That’s it.

    Currently in Taiwan, citizens receive 2500 NT per month (i.e. $80 USD) per birth until the child is five years old. That’s a fucking joke.