Did automobiles replacing horses, diminishing horse population, diminishing horse suffering – as a consequence of work forced upon the animals. Is that moral win for horses; less suffering? Although their population is vastly smaller than 130 years ago.

  • Ashy
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    7 months ago
    link
    fedilink

    Their population was unnaturally high and it’s better to not even exist in the first place than to suffer

    This guy PETAs.

    • SecretPancake
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      7 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      This guy wants to be born into slavery and die from exhaustion.

      • Ashy
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        7 months ago
        link
        fedilink

        I’d rather be born into slavery than have some arrogant self-aggrandizing narcissistic cunt decide wether my life is worth living.

            • Akasazh
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              0
              ·
              7 months ago
              edit-2
              7 months ago
              link
              fedilink

              Maybe if you were more overtly pancake? That might help

      • Dasus
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        7 months ago
        edit-2
        7 months ago
        link
        fedilink

        How’s that different from the human experience?

        You’re implying that literally all horses were abused, always.

        That’s incredibly stupid.

          • Dasus
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            0
            ·
            7 months ago
            link
            fedilink

            So literally all horses suffer, always?

            Have you ever worked with horses? (I’m assuming no, but I have to ask.)