Meta just announced that they are trying to integrate Threads with ActivityPub (Mastodon, Lemmy, etc.). We need to defederate them if we want to avoid them pushing their crap into fediverse.

If you’re a server admin, please defederate Meta’s domain “threads.net

If you don’t run your own server, please ask your server admin to defederate “threads.net.

  • aldalireEnglish
    arrow-up
    47
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    10 months ago
    link
    fedilink

    Yeah dude let’s just federate with an instance maintained by a corporation that has undoubtedly caused a genocide in Myanmar by turning a blind eye to a far-right hate speech group that caused an entire fucking minority to flee into another country.

    I don’t get why people are supporting and saying “oh it must be up to the user” like bro this is the company we’re dealing with. Fuck that fuck threads fuck zuckerberg i don’t want his shit cancer near something that’s going well so far.

    • guriiniiEnglish
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      0
      ·
      10 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      Israel have been successfully pressuring meta to remove and shadow ban accounts sympathetic to Palestinians. The level of censorship is crazy.

      • raoulraoulEnglish
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago
        link
        fedilink

        OK, I’ll bite. You got something more substantial than “I read it on the internet” to back that up? One reputable source on your accusation? Not sayin’ you’re lying/wrong, just asking for some verifiable proof.

        • guriiniiEnglish
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          0
          ·
          10 months ago
          link
          fedilink

          At the moment this is coming from secondary sources from within meta so there are no articles about it that I’m aware of. But Palestinians and activists constantly have their content removed, account reach limited, and comments removed (which has happened to me multiple times). People also have their accounts threatened and removed.

          These actions are visible constantly, meta have been doing this since the start. For example, when you go to someone’s stories at the top it might show 4 or 5 stories, but when you click through to their profile there’ll be 20+.

          Some people I follow don’t even show up at the top anymore and I have to access their stories via their profile page or if I’ve messaged them recently.

          • raoulraoulEnglish
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            10 months ago
            link
            fedilink

            After (as of this reply) eight hours, you have produced nothing more than anecdotal evidence if not outright invented. I must assume at this point you are spreading disinformation for whatever your goals may be to that end.

            Thank you for wasting everybody’s time.

            • guriiniiEnglish
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              0
              ·
              10 months ago
              link
              fedilink

              Go look for yourself instead of being condescending.

            • money_looEnglish
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              10 months ago
              link
              fedilink

              Welcome to Lemmy!

              It’s like Reddit with the provocative takes and hyperbole, but even more extreme somehow!

              This place is hilarious.

        • SulaymanFEnglish
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          0
          ·
          10 months ago
          link
          fedilink

          Numerous actual popular accounts and news sources have been suspended. It was major news in the Arabic-speaking world in October. Meta even apologized for auto-translating Palestinian as “terrorist.

    • ponikEnglish
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      0
      ·
      5 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      Excuse me sir, i cant be more agree with you

      • aldalireEnglish
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        0
        ·
        5 months ago
        edit-2
        5 months ago
        link
        fedilink

        me too ^_^

    • helenslunchEnglish
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      Please explain how federating with Threads is “supporting Meta” and not the opposite.

      • aldalireEnglish
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        0
        ·
        10 months ago
        link
        fedilink

        I’m not sure if federating will help meta so much as it will definitely (most probably) hurt the lemmy/mastodon network.

        Here’s a similar case that happened before, with the XMPP protocol being coopted by google but eventually killing it in favor of their own proprietary solution:

        https://ploum.net/2023-06-23-how-to-kill-decentralised-networks.html

        Big tech isn’t on our side, and we have to handle outside corporate influence with heavy skepticism.

    • ???English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      0
      ·
      10 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      If they want to hang out with us, they can make an account somewhere other than thread, bam, done!

      • woelkchenMEnglish
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        10 months ago
        link
        fedilink

        If they want to hang out with us, they can make an account somewhere other than thread, bam, done!

        “make another account somewhere” isn’t really what federation is about.

        • Draconic NEOEnglish
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          0
          ·
          10 months ago
          link
          fedilink

          Indeed it is, they’re not saying you have to make an account on that person’s server, they’re saying that you can make it on a different server, that’s the point of federation you can join other servers that are connected to them. It’s not to be fully open without any limitations, because if it were then content moderation would be impossible.

          Services like Nostr have this problem, they are like the wild West where anything goes and you can’t do anything about it. To some people that seems great but the fact of the matter is those services are filled with right-wing trolls and crypto scammers (likely plenty of other nasty stuff as well) because they cannot be moderated.

  • lemmesayEnglish
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    10 months ago
    edit-2
    10 months ago
    link
    fedilink

    please take a look at the replies under zuck’s own post in threads.net and determine if that’s the type of content you want.

    for those who don’t want to visit, majority of the commentators are bots. some advertising crypto, and others asking for money.

    even if you think you can individually block those accounts, keep in mind the size of threads compared to fediverse.
    for Lemmy: monthly active users are barely 150K40K, while for threads it’s 100 million. there’s no chance you can control that inflow of bots.

    and if it still doesn’t convince you, you can read threads’ privacy policy, which states that they’ll gather all that pii if you interact with their content.

    most of the internet is already bigtech, I don’t want Lemmy to become another arm of it. though I have faith in my instance maintainer and dessalines, the dev.

    • ZeppoEnglish
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      0
      ·
      10 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      Mr @zuck is there any chance of you reading my messages about my request for 2M$ man i have been trying every day to contact you and waiting for your response since last 5 months . I have told you why i am asking you for 2M$ i dont know if you ever read my messages but in short you are the only who can make it happen and if there is someone who can give me 2M$ its only you so please read my messages and please make it happen for us and change our lives I am waiting for you since last 5 months .

      Looks like the exact same bullshit as facebook and twitter. There might be better examples of good or bad posting though since Zuckerzuck’s posts are especially spammed out, since splammy people think they’re especially good for visibility.

      • lemmesayEnglish
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago
        link
        fedilink

        yeah, but I didn’t want more brain damage sifting through accounts over there lol. but still, when you have a 100 million mau, there are going to be a ton of bots, especially when there are next to no moderators.

        • ZeppoEnglish
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          0
          ·
          10 months ago
          link
          fedilink

          I’ve barely ever used threads, in a large part because they don’t have a fully functional website and require use of an app. So I have no idea I assume there’s some quality content but I agree that it must be flooded with BS too. I’d be interested in seeing what a Lemmy instance connected to threads looks like. I assume it would wreck browsing ‘New’.

          • money_looEnglish
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            10 months ago
            link
            fedilink

            I’ve used threads since it was released out of curiosity, and it’s so far got some of the best moderation I’ve ever seen.

            No joke, it seems like they are trying their best to make it as friendly and wholesome as possible.

            So many women and minorities uplifting and helping each other, it was honestly quite shocking.

            On twitter, I sometimes spend a couple hours just reporting hateful people, and only one or two reports ever gets acted on, everyone else seems to get a pass to hate.

            But on Threads, I’ve yet to even need to report a single post, it’s kinda eerie.

    • oatscoopEnglish
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      Even if there were no bots and it was only “real” content from Threads is that the sort of content we want to have Lemmy flooded with?

      • masterspaceEnglish
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        10 months ago
        edit-2
        10 months ago
        link
        fedilink

        This is dumb gatekeeping nonsense. It’s the exact same asshole bullshit behaviour we saw on Reddit when people complained about it getting popular.

        Reddit is far better for reaching a wide audience then it was when it was just a bunch of 20 something nerds in their echo chamber.

    • u/unhappy_grapefruit_2English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      0
      ·
      10 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      I don’t really have much faith in the developers myself. Considering all the shenanigans they get upto.

        • u/unhappy_grapefruit_2English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          0
          ·
          5 months ago
          edit-2
          5 months ago
          link
          fedilink

          His ideology is why I don’t have any faith in him. Hes authotarian left wing. Generally I find tankies not to be the nicest of people and tend to ignore alot of historical facts. Like the Khmer Rouge! I wonder what happened in Cambodia at some point in history 🤔🤔🤔 The way they operated there modus operandi is almost like a certain other points in history

          https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Khmer_Rouge?wprov=sfla1

  • /home/pineappleloverEnglish
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago
    edit-2
    10 months ago
    link
    fedilink

    lemm.ee already made the decision, based off of the voice of the community to defederate from Threads

  • OtherPetardEnglish
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    0
    ·
    10 months ago
    link
    fedilink

    Better yet, let them enjoy the full connectivity for a month. Once they’ve enjoyed all the awesome content and got used to it - defederate.

  • ThisfoxEnglish
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago
    link
    fedilink

    “Everyone everywhere should federate.

    “Not like that!

    • AlsephinaEnglish
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      We don’t federate with nazi instances either.

      Threads has massive homophobic and racist accounts like LibsOnTikTok and MomsForLiberty. We shouldn’t federate with an instance that can’t even take care of banning that.

  • SharkEatingBreakfastEnglish
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    10 months ago
    link
    fedilink

    Comment stolen from user “copygirl” from blahaj.zone:

    Looks like they’ll be harvesting your data if you follow anyone from Threads, maybe even injecting ads. Unsure what happens to the data of people that get followed by a Threads user. A large part of the fediverse is here precisely because they want to escape corporate meddling, data-hoarding, advertising and other anti-user malpractices. There’s a number of people talking about this, here’s a recent post that highlights some of the things from their TOS.

    • rottingleafEnglish
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      0
      ·
      10 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      It’s not as if something was preventing them from

      data-hoarding

      and

      harvesting your data

      here anyway.

      So that part about being followed by a Threads user is just a bit stupid.

      The danger is in them becoming an integral part of the network where people don’t bother to register at a normal instance, and then Meta pulling out and the network remaining half-dead.

    • chrisczEnglish
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      0
      ·
      10 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      Anyone can collect the data anyway, and I’m sure at least one person out there is already harvesting our Fediverse data.

      • irreticentEnglish
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        0
        ·
        10 months ago
        link
        fedilink

        There’s a big difference between some random person and Meta collecting the data.

        • GBU_28English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 months ago
          edit-2
          7 months ago
          link
          fedilink

          Meta can collect every scrap of Lemmy right now

          Edit: downvote for what? My comment is true

        • AuxEnglish
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          10 months ago
          link
          fedilink

          Everything is public on fedi (if we’re talking about communities alike), so any bot can and is already scrapping everything through regular HTTP. You must be extremely ignorant to think otherwise.

    • xigoiEnglish
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      0
      ·
      10 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      How can they possibly steal any data other than what you publicly shared on the internet?

  • rottingleafEnglish
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    0
    ·
    10 months ago
    edit-2
    10 months ago
    link
    fedilink

    If anybody remembers XMPP being widespread and what Facebook, Google, Apple and others (say, I personally remember VK and Yandex in Russia supporting it) did to it, that’s what will happen if you “wait and see”.

    EDIT: oh, half the thread is such comments

    • jarfilEnglish
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      0
      ·
      10 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      I remember what the standardising committee did to XMPP: users wanted to share photos, send files, and make audio/video calls; XMPP said “we’re not going to standardize that, but each application can use its own extensions” then it all went to hell.

    • KaynEnglish
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      0
      ·
      10 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      XMPP is still alive and well, is it not?

      • rottingleafEnglish
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago
        link
        fedilink

        You don’t get how big it was in 2007. I used ICQ and felt some sort of peer pressure (and progress pressure) to switch to XMPP. You could chat in FB via XMPP, in VK via XMPP, a lot of services would just give you an XMPP account because why not. It was like RSS.

        • KaynEnglish
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          0
          ·
          10 months ago
          link
          fedilink

          Will the Mastodon and Lemmy instances we have today cease to exist because of Threads federating?

          I’m just genuinely curious how we could be worse off than before.

          • pelespiritEnglish
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            0
            ·
            10 months ago
            link
            fedilink

            From a previous comment of mine:

            To be clear, I want it to be users deciding on Lemmy too. Also, people already here moving to threads wouldn’t be the problem, we’re small in comparison to them. It would be a few things:

            • They would bring in a huge party of users that would take it over and overwhelm the current users. It would be like a cruise ship of tourists taking over a small town and breaking everything for the current residents.
            • They could post to Lemmy, but we can’t really post to Mastodon. They’re going to send ads our way disguised as content, guaranteed.
            • If they can manipulate the users from Mastodon, it’s going to get out of hand fast. They have teams of devs and psych engineering to accomplish that.
            • This is volunteer ran, do we have enough energy to fight Meta when they try to enforce something?
            • Can they manipulate Activity Pub software because we’re a small team of devs? If they can, they will.
            • One person mentioned them having instance owners sign NDAs. What’s up with that?
            • MeowoemEnglish
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              10 months ago
              link
              fedilink

              It doesn’t benefit them to send adds disguised because they are paid to provide ad impressions which they wouldn’t have data for. It’s just an annoying business model not a conspiracy to brainwash you.

              • pelespiritEnglish
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                0
                ·
                10 months ago
                link
                fedilink

                Nah, companies did it on reddit all the time, it’s a thing.

                • MeowoemEnglish
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  10 months ago
                  link
                  fedilink

                  That’s why you need Nord VPN so you can play raid shadow legends safely

                  The thing is they have so much less control if they do that, I’m fed up of places with adverts where comments are turned off or heavily moderate - if their post comes here they can’t do any of that, I say we let them come, we let them come and then we smash them

    • AuxEnglish
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      XMPP was dead on arrival.

    • kateEnglish
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      0
      ·
      10 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      Oh jeez how do I turn off all the moving stuff

    • Chozo
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      0
      ·
      10 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      That site is an assault on my eyes.

      • KlearEnglish
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago
        link
        fedilink

        The design convinced me to give meta a chance.

  • NexyEnglish
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    0
    ·
    19 days ago
    link
    fedilink

    For default, they are unfederated in threads.

    Also, are you sure you want the mass don’t know what the federated web is? We are a low number of users. If we want to me the new standard of internet, we need the people to know what de Fediverse is. And threads can be that first door, and then they can start to spread to other more suitable stances.

    I just want to extend the conversation.

    • secret300English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      0
      ·
      11 days ago
      link
      fedilink

      For default, they are unfederated in threads.

      Do you mean instances have just all unfederated or that it’s built into Lemmy itself?

      I haven’t heard anything on threads in a while so I’m not sure how well it took off but I agree that having something like threads could bring in more users.

      Honestly I like the vibe of Lemmy and the fediverse now but I definitely do miss how there was a community for everything.

      • NexyEnglish
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        0
        ·
        11 days ago
        link
        fedilink

        A friend of mine made a threads account, and for his account being federated, the need to search in the settings a box of “Want your account to access the fediverse? and the default is off

        • secret300English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          0
          ·
          5 days ago
          link
          fedilink

          Wack. At least the option is there tho I guess

  • masimatutu
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    0
    ·
    10 months ago
    link
    fedilink

    By all means, fuck Meta to the moon and back, but for goodness’ sake, users on federated servers can choose to block the domain with the same result, not to mention that admins can simply restrict it (see social.coop/@eloquence/1115888…). It just isn’t so black and white as people are making it seem.

    Federation with a bigger platform is realistically the only way for Fedi to become mainstream, and at the moment Meta seems at least to be trying to be communicative. And with their quite unvaluable userbase they really don’t have enough leverage against the privacy-concious Fediverse to turn AP into MetaPub. For now.

    • moitoiEnglish
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      You’re playing the classic “it’s the individual responsability” game. It’s how you deregulate everything and the consumer losses every right.

      We have to acknowledge that we have systemic or/and societal issues. This is a systemic issues so a common thing.

  • capitalEnglish
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    10 months ago
    link
    fedilink

    Let users decide because we’re fucking adults.

    • OtterEnglish
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      0
      ·
      10 months ago
      edit-2
      10 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      Great thing about the fediverse

      People get to decide what they want from their platform

      • DogMuffinsEnglish
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago
        link
        fedilink

        Surely you’re aware of the embrace, extend, extinguish corporate strategy.

        People only get to decide what they want from their platform until facebook starts extending the spec. Then your client will become incompatible with some posts, and so on and so forth.

        In summary, it’s a threat to the platform itself.

      • pyrflieEnglish
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        0
        ·
        10 months ago
        edit-2
        10 months ago
        link
        fedilink

        They don’t get to block instances yet.

        The ability to block Instances/Threads by user would make this a non-issue.

        • rain_worlEnglish
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          0
          ·
          1 day ago
          link
          fedilink

          think jerboa lets you block instances

      • DogMuffinsEnglish
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        0
        ·
        10 months ago
        link
        fedilink

        Exactly, I hereby decide that I would like to ignore corporate efforts to undermine this burgeoning new platform. I furthermore reserve the right to complain about the loss of said platform in future years by claiming that it’s everyone elses fault for allowing corporate encroachment.

    • xantoxisEnglish
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      0
      ·
      10 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      Then go join threads.net? Nobody’s stopping you from doing that. That would put you on a server friendly to your beliefs.

      Server admins also have opinions, and are not required to take a democratic vote and each individual user’s choice into account. They can decide for themselves, and they will, for good or ill. If you don’t like where it ends up, your user decision should be to fuck off to threads.

      • xigoiEnglish
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        0
        ·
        10 months ago
        link
        fedilink

        I don’t want to join a proprietary service, but I want to be able to communicate with people who chose to join it.

        • xantoxisEnglish
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          10 months ago
          link
          fedilink

          Facebook accounts are free, that’s all ya need man

          • xigoiEnglish
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            0
            ·
            10 months ago
            link
            fedilink

            They are not free because they deprive you of your privacy.

            • xantoxisEnglish
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              10 months ago
              link
              fedilink

              Interesting. Then why would we want lemmy drowning in all that?

              • xigoiEnglish
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                0
                ·
                10 months ago
                link
                fedilink

                Because if the content is federated, then you can access it without sacrificing your privacy.

      • OtterEnglish
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        0
        ·
        10 months ago
        link
        fedilink

        I don’t think that’s what they’re saying.

        They’re saying that some users and admins might choose to wait and see

        • ttmrichter
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          10 months ago
          link
          fedilink

          “Yes, Jeffrey has, in the past, killed and eaten gay men. But we should wait and see. It’s impolite not to invite him to the party!

          • OtterEnglish
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            0
            ·
            10 months ago
            edit-2
            10 months ago
            link
            fedilink

            I don’t want to use their platform, but I get why some people might choose to stay federated so that there is incentive to pull people to mastodon and educate people about the issues

            There’s enough nuance there that I’m not dead set on either side, and I think we still have the chance to defederate later if there’s an increase in spam and harmful content / disinformation.

            • ttmrichter
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              10 months ago
              link
              fedilink

              “Jeffrey doesn’t always eat people. Just sometimes. We should totally go clubbing with him and spurn him later if he eats one of us.

    • Draconic NEOEnglish
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      0
      ·
      10 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      You have the full right to decide, you can switch servers to one that chooses to, or open multiple accounts. That’s your choice. This isn’t Nostr, in the Fediverse instance blocking is normal and it happens without your input, but you know what does happen with your input? Registering your account on a server that fits your needs best, or as close as possible.

    • net00English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      0
      ·
      10 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      This is a bigger issue to leave it to users imo. Like lemm.ee admin said a few months ago, threads is too fucking big.

      Anything they push on the fediverse will be what users see in All. Plus, popular stuff on threads is determined through Facebook’s algorithm, and it will also determine the fediverse recommendations by consequence.

      The above is solvable if you block them I guess, but by default it will completely ruin everything.

      However, lemmy 0.19 block feature doesn’t work on users of an instance, only posts hosted in an instance. Add to this that Facebook is a cancerous company making all its money from ads. Expect their bots to comment and make posts pushing ads on all instances.

      All of this will also mean high workload on mods to regulate the content. Threads doesn’t bring anything good here, and defederation is probably the only way to protect us.

      • capitalEnglish
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago
        link
        fedilink

        The above is solvable if you block them I guess, but by default it will completely ruin everything.

        Yes. One minute of a user’s time and all that’s gone.

        Compare that with having to move instances due to admins blocking at the instance level.

    • JacktheladEnglish
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      This is why I don’t understand all the hysteria about this.

      If I don’t want to see Threads or I don’t want Threads to see me, I can go to a Threads account and click “block threads.net.

      But obviously that’s too complicated and it’s easier to just whinge to your instance admin about how Threads federation will be the death of us all. 🙄

      • DogMuffinsEnglish
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        0
        ·
        10 months ago
        link
        fedilink

        If there was a bot that just flooded All with far right talking points, do you think admins ought to block that or leave it to the users?

        What if it was far right mixed in with cat memes?

        What if it started more slowly like a few posts an hour and then ramped up over 6 months to be 1000s of posts per hour?

        • xigoiEnglish
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          10 months ago
          link
          fedilink

          Leave it to users. Let people decide what they want to see.

    • AsukaEnglish
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      10 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      This. Imagine begging daddy admin to protect you from mean Meta.

      • LinyosTEnglish
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        0
        ·
        10 months ago
        link
        fedilink

        Imagine zucking on Marks schlong.

      • ttmrichter
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago
        link
        fedilink

        You understand that no matter how much you kneel down to service Meta, Zuck the Fuck won’t be trickling anything down on you that isn’t a bodily fluid, right?

        And hey, I’m not going to kink-shame. Just pointing out that if that isn’t your specific kink, you might want to wake up to there being zero dollars trickling down to you.

        • AsukaEnglish
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          10 months ago
          link
          fedilink

          What a meaningless, worthless comment. Letting Threads federate with the rest of the Fediverse doesn’t give Zuckerberg power over us (unless you’d care to explain how it does) - rather, it just gives its users and our users the ability to interacted. Why are you so interested in building walls?

          • ttmrichter
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            0
            ·
            10 months ago
            edit-2
            10 months ago
            link
            fedilink

            I swear, I’m seeing the western equivalent of wumaos servicing Meta here. Only at least the wumaos got paid; it made sense. These idiots are doing the labour for free!

    • aldalireEnglish
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      10 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      Yeah dude let’s just federate with an instance maintained by a corporation that has undoubtedly caused a genocide in Myanmar by turning a blind eye to a far-right hate speech group that caused an entire fucking minority to flee into another country.

      I don’t get why people are supporting and saying “oh it must be up to the user” like bro this is the company we’re dealing with. Fuck that fuck threads fuck zuckerberg i don’t want his shit cancer near something that’s going well so far.

          • Daft_ishEnglish
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            10 months ago
            edit-2
            10 months ago
            link
            fedilink

            I can’t imagine why you are getting push back. I can tell you are very passionate in your position and are on the right side of a complicated issue. The only reason I can think of is your idea hasn’t become mainstream yet and people hate it when they don’t know they should be upset.

            Either way I have no skin in it and I agree that meta is garbage. Thank you for be passionate about something in this dispassionate world.

            • mobEnglish
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              0
              ·
              10 months ago
              edit-2
              10 months ago
              link
              fedilink

              I’d imagine is because Myanmars situation is way more complicated than Facebook “undoubtedly caused a genocide”.

              Seems like it’s getting trivialized to shit on Facebook

              • Daft_ishEnglish
                arrow-up
                0
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                10 months ago
                link
                fedilink

                Facebook deserves every ounce of shit it has coming to them.

                • mobEnglish
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  0
                  ·
                  10 months ago
                  link
                  fedilink

                  True.

                  But do you believe the actual people commiting the genocide and manipulating Facebook shouldn’t be held accountable for their actions?

          • LemmyIsFantasticEnglish
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            10 months ago
            link
            fedilink

            🙄 I guess the years of violence well before hand we their fault too. Imagine trying to tie years off violence and genocide to Facebook.

            It’ll always be Burna to me.

            • ttmrichter
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              10 months ago
              link
              fedilink

              It will always be a name that doesn’t exist and has never existed?

              (Hint: BURMA. It’s hard to sound smart when you can’t even get a single fucking name right! Especially the name that “it will always be” for you. Holy fucking shit!)

              • LemmyIsFantasticEnglish
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                0
                ·
                10 months ago
                link
                fedilink

                You wrote all that over an obvious typo? 🤣🤣🤣🤣

                • ttmrichterEnglish
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  10 months ago
                  link
                  fedilink

                  An “obvious” typo you missed when you wrote it. When you read it back after posting. In a post where you were putting on airs of being smarter than everybody.

                  I fucking love it when that happens and love to rub it in.

        • OtterEnglish
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          0
          ·
          10 months ago
          link
          fedilink

          That one is actually public record, with

          • Facebook using their influence to set up in the country in a way that made it the dominant form of internet access for the country, enough that a large number of people considered Facebook=internet

          • Facebook getting multiple reputable warnings about what was happening on the platform, what their advertising policies and algorithms were encouraging, and they chose to not act on them and instead continued to profit from it

          • They finally did act after a whole lot of harm was done

        • Aniki 🌱🌿English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          10 months ago
          edit-2
          10 months ago
          link
          fedilink

          Because it was totally and we have the receipts? Imagine being that ignorant of world events.

  • IaparEnglish
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    0
    ·
    10 months ago
    link
    fedilink

    Could threads generate so much data that it costs to much to keep an instance/server running?

    In my opinion all big player are just federating to destroy the fediverse or take it over. Why else would they be here? There is just no need for them to be here exept to kill competition before it gets to big.

    • blind3rdeyeEnglish
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      0
      ·
      10 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      Are we not discussing the choice to defederate? As in most choices, some options are better than others. Sometimes it isn’t obvious what the best option is. People discuss and share ideas to make their decision.

      We as a community are faced with the choice of whether or not to support threads[.]net. We can think about it individually, or on an instance-by-instance basis - but we can also discuss it collectively. That’s whats happening here.

      • xigoiEnglish
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        0
        ·
        10 months ago
        link
        fedilink

        Defederation is not user choice, it’s decided by the admin of an entire instance.

    • ValmondEnglish
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      What a lame take.

      Go to their server if you want to or one that don’t defederate, or spin one up yourself, the choice is still yours.

      I don’t want meta to benefit from my server, hosting their biased crap, how about that for a user choice.

      • kpw
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        0
        ·
        10 months ago
        link
        fedilink

        It’s your freedom as an admin to block them, but indeed the cost is the freedom of your users to communicate with people on Threads. As a user I would prefer an instance that doesn’t restrict my communications in that way.

        • ValmondEnglish
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          10 months ago
          link
          fedilink

          Freedom isn’t letting everything be or letting anyone do anything. That’s anarchy.

          When meta kills off 99% of Lemmy servers because they can, where’s your “freedom”?

          • kpw
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            0
            ·
            10 months ago
            link
            fedilink

            Freedom isn’t letting everything be or letting anyone do anything.

            I only talked about communicating with Threads users not “anything”.

            When meta kills off 99% of Lemmy servers

            Why should Meta be able to do this?