• zephyreks
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    0
    ·
    1 year ago
    edit-2
    1 year ago
    link
    fedilink

    Per this source: https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.abc1507

    The treated water contains traces of other radioactive elements that do bioaccumulate. While the water alone is below the legal food limit, that can’t be considered as a fair limit due to bioaccumulation of heavier radioactive isotopes.

    • PowerCrazy
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago
      link
      fedilink

      They filtered out the majority of the other bio-accumulating isotopes. “Trace amounts” of isotopes exist in every single element independent of nuclear power plants.

      • zephyreks
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        0
        ·
        1 year ago
        link
        fedilink

        But the traces in the wastewater are fairly high, falling just below legal food limits (ignoring that bioaccumulation by definition accumulates toxins from the water into animals).

        • PowerCrazy
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago
          link
          fedilink

          Where are you reading that? I saw that the heavy metals were all filtered out and this discharge is for the Tritated Water only, with “trace” amounts of the heavy metals, meaning what you would find in normal salt water.