• reddig33English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    7 months ago
    link
    fedilink

    Oh well. I guess they’ll just have to go bankrupt then.

    • frezikEnglish
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      7 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      And now you starve. None of the stores will stay open long without them.

      • CarbonIceDragonEnglish
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        0
        ·
        7 months ago
        link
        fedilink

        That should mean they don’t go bankrupt though. If their service is vital, people will pay for it even if the prices rise. It would mean an increase in prices for goods admittedly as the stores try to recoup the increased logistics costs, but intuitively I’d imagine the financial impact on the end customer wouldn’t be as much because they’re paying for the road upkeep either way, just via higher taxes in the current state and via increased prices in the new one.

        • BassTurdEnglish
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 months ago
          link
          fedilink

          That’s not a supply and demand thing though. There just wouldn’t be product to buy because there’s no way to get it to the stores. It’s less about the bankruptcy and more about availability.

          • CarbonIceDragonEnglish
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            0
            ·
            7 months ago
            link
            fedilink

            I mean the supply and demand for the trucking companies. Shipping is a vital service, if it had high taxes, it would have to dramatically increase prices for their shipping service, but they shouldn’t go out of business because everyone else would still pay those dramatically high prices, because they’d have to

      • NommerEnglish
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        7 months ago
        link
        fedilink

        Think of the shareholders!