• reddig33English
    arrow-up
    138
    arrow-down
    0
    ·
    7 months ago
    link
    fedilink

    They should be cheaper to repair since there are less parts. The added costs are related to design decisions.

    When things are welded together instead of paneled, it’s more expensive. When battery packs have to be replaced in their entirety instead of individual packs or cells, it’s more expensive. Etc. Etc.

    • podpersonEnglish
      arrow-up
      55
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      7 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      Exactly. Example: on the Tesla Model 3, many of the panels (such as the rear quarter panel) are glued on instead of bolted/clipped on. So if you graze a stationary object and damage that (it happens), you’re on the hook for a very expensive repair since you need a repair shop that specializes in how to deal with that (plus the actual time to do the repair, which is more complicated). Update the designs to make them more repair friendly and the cost of ownership comes way down.

      • ShepherdPieEnglish
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        0
        ·
        7 months ago
        link
        fedilink

        What car has removable rear quarters? I can’t think of any that aren’t welded on to the C-pillar/roof/trunk.

        • fuckwit_mcbumcrumbleEnglish
          arrow-up
          13
          arrow-down
          0
          ·
          7 months ago
          link
          fedilink

          Basically all modern car body panels are held together with basically a really strong glue.

      • SocsaEnglish
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        0
        ·
        7 months ago
        link
        fedilink

        This is literally every single car on the road

    • 0x0English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      0
      ·
      7 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      Surely you don’t mean to imply built-in obsolescence, do you?