• nanoUFOOPMEnglish
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago
    link
    fedilink

    I agree but pay walling features is just asking for trouble, I should of specified what I meant with pateron.

    • ChewyEnglish
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      0
      ·
      7 months ago
      edit-2
      7 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      The features weren’t exactly paywalled, as the source code was always available. They merely provided beta builds to patreons, that were also available free of charge by someone else [1].

      ~~[1] https://github.com/pineappleEA/pineapple-src/releases~~

      Selling emulators is legal, as far as we know (been a while since the last ruling). If it’s true what others have pointed out, that yuzu devs were distributing copyrighted material in their public discord and talking open about privacy, then Nintendo has support for their argument that yuzu was intentionally designed to circumvent copy protection and purposely facilitates piracy.

      • nanoUFOOPMEnglish
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        0
        ·
        7 months ago
        link
        fedilink

        Isn’t pineapple just stealing the builds from pateron and did they release the current source code or did that get released after pateron build went public. I didn’t really keep track of it.

        • ChewyEnglish
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          0
          ·
          7 months ago
          link
          fedilink

          You’re likely right, it seems like they made use of the code being open-source and distributed it freely after getting access through patreon. Each commit is quite big with all the source code changes of the specific early access build.