John Barnett had worked for Boeing for 32 years, until his retirement in 2017.

In the days before his death, he had been giving evidence in a whistleblower lawsuit against the company.

Boeing said it was saddened to hear of Mr Barnett’s passing. The Charleston County coroner confirmed his death to the BBC on Monday.

It said the 62-year-old had died from a “self-inflicted” wound on 9 March and police were investigating.

  • foshoEnglish
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago
    link
    fedilink

    You absolutely did not. The question was not: “Why don’t news organizations claim Boeing execs murdered a guy? The commenter was clearly aware of the problem of libel, which you completely ignored. They asked why news orgs aren’t discussing the fact that the death comes at a suspiciously convenient time - because they aren’t. This is not the same as claiming that he was murdered by Boeing.

    • FiniteBanjo
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      He claimed it shouldn’t be libelous and I explained that it would be libelous. You’re implying that journalists are somehow dancing around the issue, which is silly because we’re all pretty well informed that the whistleblower was probably murdered.

      • foshoEnglish
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 months ago
        link
        fedilink

        it’s not libelous to discuss the elephant in the room. you did not explain anything. you just disregarded the question with your assumption.

        • FiniteBanjo
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 months ago
          link
          fedilink

          If you say a person or entity with a public image did something really bad that they haven’t been strictly proven to have done, with exceptions for things such as parody, then that is defamation. So, yes, it can be libelous to talk about the fucking elephant.

          • foshoEnglish
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            0
            ·
            7 months ago
            link
            fedilink

            wowdaft. it couldn’t be more clear that the suggestion is discussing the suspicious nature WITHOUT making direct accusations.

              • foshoEnglish
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                7 months ago
                link
                fedilink

                heh, the subtle suggestion that one shouldn’t have a life away from here is embarrassing.

                • FiniteBanjo
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  7 months ago
                  link
                  fedilink

                  Oh goodness, imagine being so depressingly homely as to spend 30s checking an inbox more than once a week. Can you imagine?

                  • foshoEnglish
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    7 months ago
                    link
                    fedilink

                    what are you even talking about? you’ve lost the plot.