nutomictoFediverse@lemmy.ml·7 months agocross-posted to: solarpunk@slrpnk.netfediverse@lemmy.worldAnnouncing Ibis, the federated Wikipedia Alternative(ibis.wiki)external-linkarrow-up1517arrow-down140message-square302fedilink
arrow-up1477arrow-down1external-linkAnnouncing Ibis, the federated Wikipedia Alternative(ibis.wiki)nutomictoFediverse@lemmy.ml·7 months agocross-posted to: solarpunk@slrpnk.netfediverse@lemmy.worldmessage-square302fedilink
minus-squareRolderarrow-up2arrow-down2·7 months agolinkfedilinkI’ve never had issues with Wikipedia not at least mentioning a controversy on a topic if one exists. Got any current examples?
minus-squarebrain_in_a_boxarrow-up2arrow-down1·7 months agoedit-25 months agolinkfedilinkRemoved by mod
minus-squareRolderarrow-up2arrow-down2·7 months agolinkfedilinkNever heard of any examples and certainly no one has provided any in this thread. Just been the usual muh western website is evil by default kind of stuff.
I’ve never had issues with Wikipedia not at least mentioning a controversy on a topic if one exists. Got any current examples?
Removed by mod
Never heard of any examples and certainly no one has provided any in this thread. Just been the usual muh western website is evil by default kind of stuff.