• GBU_28English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 months ago
    link
    fedilink

    The key metric would be to review care detection and frequency at the same chronological age of participants, not simply today.

      • GBU_28English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        7 months ago
        edit-2
        7 months ago
        link
        fedilink

        No, do not write leading statements like that, it’s rude. Just ask me to clarify.

        I’m saying there’s.no point measuring millennial healthcare analytics vs older generations because millennials aren’t older yet (obviously). So point in time analytics aren’t valuable ( edit to my conversation, obviously they are useful) My point was to understand the health analytics of a cohort relative to care options, you must consider the same age band, no matter the year.

        So like " describe mental health detection among 20-30 yo’s across decade’s of history"

        • frogfruitEnglish
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          7 months ago
          edit-2
          7 months ago
          link
          fedilink

          deleted by creator

          • GBU_28English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            7 months ago
            link
            fedilink

            It’s a statement you are assuming I made, which I contested.