• FiniteBanjo
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    7 months ago
    link
    fedilink

    If the majority of people don’t agree on the proposed meaning of a word then that isn’t what the words mean. In other words, it is wrong.

    • AlsephinaEnglish
      arrow-up
      46
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      7 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      It’s a materialist/Marxist definition, hence the

      Because Marxists are like

      https://www.hexbear.net/pictrs/image/89911414-d2de-4d35-8bb4-2a9a4267b8c5.png

      https://en.prolewiki.org/wiki/Fascism

      All successful labor movements and mass organizations in the past have included teaching others how things work, handing out pamphlets, etc.

      And so we can choose to act towards restoring definitions to words with important meanings, so that we become capable of discussing the things they signify again.

      If we don’t use words as they mean, but instead use unorthodox terminology, then we allow the significance of such words to be lost, with no standardized alternatives in common use - i.e., no alternatives that are any more clear than the original word.

      There is a war on language. It’s primarily a subset of the class war. We can surrender, or fight what is probably the simplest fight of our life: We can use words as they were meant to be used.

      • FiniteBanjo
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        15
        ·
        7 months ago
        link
        fedilink

        Yeah, I’m glad you’re slowly starting to comprehend the conversation. I’m informing you that making up definitions for words is wrong and is the source of confusion when you try and fail to converse with others.

        • AlsephinaEnglish
          arrow-up
          43
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 months ago
          link
          fedilink

          I’m sorry you don’t understand how languages work