• Turbo
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 months ago
    link
    fedilink

    And in sure 150 launches in a year is not contributed in any way to global warming

    Especially that startship Right?

    The problem is all with us, and that salad dressing container we threw out instead of recycling or those plastic bags . Right?

    How are we not taxing them more? This Is unnecessary and no wonder the planet is heating up.

    150 rocket launches must make a material difference!

    • Corkyskog
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      0
      ·
      7 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      Probably not as much as we assume. Space related emissions are 1% of the aviation industry. Also, we just discovered ocean trawling and dredging is the equivalent to the entire aviation industry

      There just is a lot that needs to be done before even worrying about space launch emissions.

    • ShimmeringKoi [comrade/them]English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      0
      ·
      7 months ago
      edit-2
      7 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      Because the rich have de facto control of all levers of power and will run roughshod over the entire planet until the rest of us force them to stop

    • SinAdjetivos
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      0
      ·
      7 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      Less than you would expect, this looks like it’s a good, balanced synopsis if you’re interested however you’re not wrong about it being a problem, and pointing out the PR/gaslighting that surrounds the issue.

      Also it’s worth noting that SpaceX is using LOX-Kerosone because it’s “cheaper” than options which pollute much less (namely LH2-LOX) because the cost of the kerosene is “externalized” and you are correct that something like appropriate taxing could start to fix that issue and force them to make better decisions