• rekabis
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    7 months ago
    edit-2
    7 months ago
    link
    fedilink

    What’s even more entitled is you thinking you have a right to shelter you don’t even use when hundreds of thousands nation-wide cannot afford shelter due to people like you hoovering up unused homes.

    You know what your attitude is called? Parasitical and greedy.

    • dogslayeggs
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      You do realize that some people get temporarily relocated for work, right? If I have to do a job for 3 months in Minnesota, it isn’t long enough to rent my place in California because renter’s rights won’t allow me to kick them out when I get back. You think that’s me being greedy and parasitical?

    • dogslayeggs
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      So a person earns money and spends it on something, and you think that is parasitic. A different person spends no money and uses something someone else paid for, and that isn’t parasitic?

      I agree that housing should be a basic human right. I agree that people owning many homes is problematic. But owning a second house that you use for vacations is not what is causing a housing shortage. Owning 5 homes and Airbnbing 4 of them IS part of the cause. Allowing corporations and foreign citizens to own homes is part of the cause. Me buying empty land and building a vacation house on land that has sat empty for millions of years isn’t causing a housing shortage.

    • ShepherdPie
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      7 months ago
      edit-2
      7 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      Do you extend this sentiment to vehicles too? If I drive to work and park my car there, is it morally correct for someone to come steal it because they want to drive somewhere or sleep in it but don’t have a car? After all, it’s just sitting there unused, so I must be some entitled asshole for expecting it to be there when I’m ready to head home, right?

      I also find it funny you chose the words parasitical and greedy when these squatters are quite literally feeding off the homeowners and selfishly taking something that doesn’t belong to them. Your argument is not too different from a CEO who wants to cut worker pay and give himself a bigger bonus with the money.

      • andrewtaOP
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 months ago
        link
        fedilink

        I agree with you. How does one apply this logic to homes but not to cars, phones, bikes or anything else?

        • rekabis
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          0
          ·
          7 months ago
          link
          fedilink

          cars, phones, bikes

          Since when are those essential to life, or whose availability constantly/consistently mean the difference between life and death?

          Food, shelter, and clothing are the essentials that should have a base tier that anyone can leverage at low to no cost. Anything else is superfluous.

          • andrewtaOP
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            7 months ago
            edit-2
            7 months ago
            link
            fedilink

            Theft is theft. I do not care if it’s a bike a phone or house .

    • andrewtaOP
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      7 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      In my example what I was talking about was, while I was away I rented a placed for temporary lodging.

      And that is vacuuming up lodging?

      I still say you are entitled.

      But moving on. Have a good day