Archive link

Microsoft’s Windows and foreign database programs also sidelined as Beijing favours Chinese hardware and software

Among the 18 approved processors were chips from Huawei and state-backed group Phytium. Both are on Washington’s export blacklist. Chinese processor makers are using a mixture of chip architectures including Intel’s x86, Arm and homegrown ones, while operating systems are derived from open-source Linux software.

  • m-p{3}
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    0
    ·
    7 months ago
    link
    fedilink

    That probably explain why they’re investing so much in RISC-V.

    • someguy3English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      0
      ·
      7 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      Are the chips easier to make?

      • 7heo
        arrow-up
        21
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 months ago
        link
        fedilink

        Substantially. CISC vs RISC is night and day. Keeping x86 for so long was a mistake, but one that generated billions in value for shareholders.

        • heyoni
          arrow-up
          13
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 months ago
          link
          fedilink

          Oh I love it when shareholders get their value!!

        • mihies
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          0
          ·
          7 months ago
          link
          fedilink

          But the manufacturing is still an issue.

        • someguy3English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          0
          ·
          7 months ago
          edit-2
          7 months ago
          link
          fedilink

          If I can ask, if we go way back like 40 or 50 years ago, why did cisc get adopted over risc?

          • fuckwit_mcbumcrumble
            arrow-up
            13
            arrow-down
            0
            ·
            7 months ago
            link
            fedilink

            Cisc was never adopted. It all started out basic, then they gradually added more and more shit until you had a complex CPU.

            Without the concept of risc there wouldn’t be a cisc.

          • 7heo
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            0
            ·
            7 months ago
            link
            fedilink

            Additionally to the other answer: the reason CISC came up to be was “less instructions”. Memory was a lot more expensive, and developers worked in assembly a lot more. So, less instructions made a lot of sense. Now, memory is cheap, and developers almost never write assembly unassisted.