• marcos
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 months ago
    link
    fedilink

    Yet the world is full of code that was replaced with less work than it would take to fix a single bug on the broken original.

    It’s almost like if universal rules for software engineering doesn’t exist but no, that’s crazy.

    • abhibeckert
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      0
      ·
      7 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      Replacing code is fine. Replacing an entire product is the mistake.

    • lysdexicOPEnglish
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      0
      ·
      7 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      Yet the world is full of code that was replaced with less work than it would take to fix a single bug on the broken original.

      Can you point out a concrete example? Because you’re commenting on a discussion on an essay that documents several notorious examples that demonstrate the opposite point.

      • QuaternionsRock
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        0
        ·
        7 months ago
        link
        fedilink

        I’m not extremely familiar with it, but I think X11 qualifies. I think it was determined that HDR support would be basically impossible to implement.

    • KeenFlame
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      0
      ·
      7 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      Ah yes those projects exist, that just are perfect and Or wait was that a dream maybe. Anyway, I’m sure they exist. After all, there’s no universial rules, society and science doesn’t constantly evolve and improve by searching for and defining such rules since the dawn of time Or was that a dream maybe. Anyway, I am certain this is wrong because my code is perfect